Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:12:28.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of near-separatrix motion in planetary systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Su Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, 210093, Nanjing, China email: suwang@nju.edu.cn, zhoujl@nju.edu.cn
Ji-Lin Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Nanjing University, 210093, Nanjing, China email: suwang@nju.edu.cn, zhoujl@nju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Near-separatrix motion is a kind of motion of two planets with their relative apsidal longitude near the boundary between libration and circulation. Observed multiple planetary systems seem to favor near-separatrix motions between neighboring planets. In this report, we study the probability that near-separatrix motion occurs with both the linear secular system and full three-body systems. We find that generally the ratio of near-separatrix motion is small unless the eccentricities of the two planets differ from each other by an order of magintude, or they are in mean motion resonance. To explore the dynamical procedures causing the near-separatrix motion, we suppose a modification to scattering model by adding a mass-accretion process during the protoplanet growth. Statistics on the modified scattering model indicate that the probability of the final planet pairs in near-separatrix motion is high (∼ 85%), which may explain the high occurrence of near-separatrix motions in observed planetary systems.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Barnes, R. & Greenberg, R. 2006, ApJ, 638, 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. & Greeberg, R. 2006, ApJ, 652, L53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. 2008, this issue.Google Scholar
Buter, R. P., et al. 2006, ApJ, 646, 505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, E. B., Lystad, V., & Rasio, F. A. 2005, Nature, 434, 873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladman, B. 1993, Icarus, 106, 247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikoma, M., Nakazawa, K., & Emori, H. 2000, ApJ, 537, 1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kley, W., Peita, J., & Bryden, G. 2004, A & A, 414, 735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, G., Chambers, J., & Fischer, D. 2000, ApJ, 579, 455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcy, G., et al. 2005, PThPS, 158, 24Google Scholar
Papaloizou, J. C. B. & Terquem, C. 2006, RPPh, 69, 119Google Scholar
Pollack, J. B. et al. 1996, Icarus, 124, 62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sándor, Zs., Kley, W. 2007, A & A, 472, 781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J. L. & Sun, Y. S. 2003, ApJ, 598, 1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J. L. & Lin, D. N. C 2007, ApJ, 666, 447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, J. L., Lin, D. N. C. & Sun, Y. S. 2007, ApJ, 666, 423CrossRefGoogle Scholar