Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:15:54.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exciting maser science with new instruments – the promise of the EVLA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2007

Karl M. Menten
Karl M. Menten*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, D-53121,Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the near future, the Expanded Very Large Array (EVLA) will allow surveys for maser sources with unprecedented sensitivity, spectral coverage and spectroscopic capabilities. In particular, comprehensive surveys for many maser species with simultaneous sensitive continuum imaging and absorption studies will give a comprehensive radio picture of star formation in the Galactic plane and elsewhere. Very efficient EVLA surveys for H2O megamasers in Active Galacic Nuclei will be possible to practically arbitrary redshifts.

EVLA and Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) studies of H2O and SiO masers will serve as high resolution probes of the innermost envelopes of oxygen-rich evolved stars and HCN masers of carbon-rich stars.

Farther in the future, the Square Kilometer Array (SKA) promises the detection of OH gigamasers at all conceivable redshifts and maser astrometry with unprecedented accuracy.

Keywords

masersinstrumentation: high angular resolutioninstrumentation: interferometerssurveysstars: formationGalaxy: structure
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 3 , Symposium S242: Astrophysical Masers and their Environments , March 2007 , pp. 496 - 505
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2008

References

Barvainis, R., & Antonucci, R. 2005, ApJ, 628, L89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, R. A., et al. 2003, PASP, 115, 953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braatz, J. A., Henkel, C., Greenhill, L. J., Moran, J. M., & Wilson, A. S. 2004, ApJ, 617, L29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, F. H. 1998, A&A, 336, 815Google Scholar
Caswell, J. L., & Haynes, R. F. 1987, Austr. J. of Physics, 40, 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, J. L., Batchelor, R. A., Forster, J. R., & Wellington, K. J. 1989, Austr. J. of Physics, 42, 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, J. L., Vaile, R. A., Ellingsen, S. P., Whiteoak, J. B., & Norris, R. P. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchwell, E., Witzel, A., Huchtmeier, W., Pauliny-Toth, I., Roland, J., & Sieber, W. 1977, A&A, 54, 969Google Scholar
Claussen, M. J., Wilking, B. A., Benson, P. J., Wootten, A., Myers, P. C., & Terebey, S. 1996, ApJS, 106, 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R. J., et al. 2007, IAU Symposium 237, 403Google Scholar
Condon, J. J., et al. 1998, AN, 115, 1693Google Scholar
Deacon, R. M., Chapman, J. M., Green, A. J., & Sevenster, M. N. 2007, ApJ, 658, 1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, V. L., Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., & Pillai, T. 2006, A&A, 458, 485Google Scholar
Fomalont, E., & Reid, M. 2004, New Astronomy Review, 48, 1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrington, S. T., et al. 2004, Proc. SPIE, 5489, 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habing, H. J., Sevenster, M. N., Messineo, M., van de Ven, G. & Kuijken, K. 2006, A&A, 458, 151Google Scholar
Ivison, R. J. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, K. J., et al. 1997, ApJ, 490, 758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, S. 2005, Massive Star Birth: A Crossroads of Astrophysics, 227, 111Google Scholar
Lo, K. Y. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 625Google Scholar
Lonsdale, C. J., et al. 1998, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 30, 1355Google Scholar
Menten, K. M. 1991, ApJ, 380, L75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menten, K. M. 1996, Molecules in Astrophysics: Probes & Processes, 178, 163Google Scholar
Messineo, M., Habing, H. J., Sjouwerman, L. O., Omont, A. & Menten, K. M. 2002, A&A, 393, 115Google Scholar
Miyoshi, M., et al. 1995, Nature, 373, 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, H. S. P., Menten, K. M., & Mäder, H. 2004, A&A, 428, 1019Google Scholar
Murakami, H., et al. 2007, ArXiv e-prints, 708, arXiv:0708.1796Google Scholar
Neufeld, D. A., & Melnick, G. J. 1991, ApJ, 368, 215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, R. P., Caswell, J. L., Gardner, F. F., & Wellington, K. J. 1987, ApJ, 321, L159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omont, A., et al. 2003, A&A, 403, 975Google Scholar
Palla, F., Cesaroni, R., Brand, J., Caselli, P., Comoretto, G., & Felli, M. 1993, A&A, 280, 599Google Scholar
Pandian, J. D., Goldsmith, P. F., & Deshpande, A. A. 2007, ApJ 656, 255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Trippe, S., Ott, T., & Genzel, R. 2007, ApJ, 659, 378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, R., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 354, 305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuller, F., et al. 2003, A&A, 403, 955Google Scholar
Sevenster, M. N., van Langevelde, H. J., Moody, R. A., Chapman, J. M., Habing, H. J., & Killeen, N. E. B. 2001, A&A, 366, 481Google Scholar
Townsend, R. H. D., Ivison, R. J., Smail, I., Blain, A. W. & Frayer, D. T. 2001, MNRAS, 328, L17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walmsley, M. 1995, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 1, 137Google Scholar
Wood, D. O. S., & Churchwell, E. 1989, ApJS, 69, 831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zijlstra, A. A. et al. , 2001, MNRAS 322, 280CrossRefGoogle Scholar