Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:04:33.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confronting Stellar Evolution Models for Active and Inactive Solar-Type Stars: The Triple System V1061 Cygni

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2007

Guillermo Torres
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden St., Cambridge, MA 02138 e-mail: gtorres@cfa.harvard.edu
Claud H. Sandberg Lacy
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Laurence A. Marschall
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, Gettysburg College, 300 North Washington Street, Gettysburg, PA 17325
Holly A. Sheets
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics & Astronomy, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755
Jeff A. Mader
Affiliation:
W.M. Keck Observatory, Kamuela, HI 96743
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present spectroscopic and photometric observations of the chromospherically active (X-ray strong) eclipsing binary V1061 Cyg (P = 2.35 days) showing that it is in reality a hierarchical triple system. We combine these observations with Hipparcos intermediate data (abscissa residuals) to derive the outer orbit with a period of 15.8 yr. We determine accurate values for the masses, radii, and effective temperatures of the eclipsing binary components, as well as for the mass and temperature of the third star. For the primary we obtain M = 1.282 ± 0.015 M, R = 1.615 ± 0.017 R, Teff = 6180 ± 100 K, for the secondary M = 0.9315 ± 0.0068 M, R = 0.974 ± 0.020 R, Teff = 5300 ± 150 K, and for the tertiary M = 0.925 ± 0.036 M and Teff = 5670 ± 100 K. Current stellar evolution models agree well with the properties of the primary star, but show a large discrepancy in the radius of the secondary in the sense that the observed value is about 10% larger than predicted (a 5σ effect). We also find the secondary temperature to be ∼200 K cooler than indicated by the models. These discrepancies are quite remarkable considering that the secondary is only 7% less massive than the Sun, which is the calibration point of all stellar models. Similar differences with theory have been seen before for lower mass stars. We identify chromospheric activity as the likely cause of the effect. Inactive stars agree very well with the models, while active ones such as the secondary of V1061 Cyg appear systematically too large and too cool. Both of these differences are understood in terms of the effects of magnetic fields commonly associated with chromospheric activity.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Andersen, J. 1991, A&A Rev., 3, 91 Google Scholar
Clausen, J.V., Baraffe, I., Claret, A., & VandenBerg, D.A. 1999a, in Theory and Tests of Convection in Stellar Structure, eds. A. Giménez, E.F. Guinan, & B. Montesinos, ASP Conf. Ser. 173 (San Francisco: ASP), 265Google Scholar
Demarque, P., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y.-C., & Yi, S.K. 2004, ApJS, 155, 667 Google Scholar
Etzel, P.B. 1981, in Photometric and Spectroscopic Binary Systems, ed. E.B. Carling & Z. Kopal (NATO ASI Ser. C., 69) (Dordrecht: Reidel), 111Google Scholar
Lacy, C.H.S., Torres, G., & Claret, A., & Vaz, L.P.R. 2005, AJ, 130, 2838 Google Scholar
Lejeune, Th., Cuisinier, F., & Buser, R. 1998, A&A, 130, 65 Google Scholar
López-Morales, M. & Ribas, I. 2005, ApJ, 631, 1120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullan, D.J., & MacDonald, J. 2001, ApJ, 559, 353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, D.M. 1996, ApJS, 106, 133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, D.M. 1997, AJ, 114, 1195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, D.M., & Etzel, P.B. 1981, AJ, 86, 102 Google Scholar
Popper, D.M., Lacy, C.H., Frueh, M.L., & Turner, A. E., 1986, AJ, 91, 383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribas, I. 2003, A&A, 398, 239 Google Scholar
Torres, G., Lacy, C.H., Marschall, L.A., Sheets, H.A., & Mader, J.A. 2006, ApJ, 640, 1018 Google Scholar
Torres, G., & Ribas, I. 2002, ApJ, 567, 1140 Google Scholar
Yi, S.K., Demarque, P., Kim, Y.-C., Lee, Y.-W., Ree, C.H., Lejeune, T., & Barnes, S. 2001, ApJS, 136, 417 Google Scholar
Zucker, S., Torres, G., & Mazeh, T. 1995, ApJ, 452, 863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar