Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:56:26.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiatively inefficient accretion disks in low-luminosity AGN†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Ferdinando D. Macchetto
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD 21218 email: macchetto@stsci.edu
Marco Chiaberge
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr., Baltimore, MD 21218 email: macchetto@stsci.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We study a complete and distance-limited sample of 25 LINERs, 21 of which have been imaged with the Hubble Space Telescope to study their physical properties and to compare their radio and optical properties with those of other samples of local AGNs, namely Seyfert galaxies and low-luminosity radio galaxies (LLRG). Our results show that the LINERs population is not homogeneous, as there are two subclasses: i) the first class is similar to LLRG, as it extends the population of radio-loud nuclei to lower luminosities; ii) the second is similar to Seyferts, and extends the properties of radio-quiet nuclei towards the lowest luminosities. The different nature of the various classes of local AGN are best understood when the fraction of the Eddington luminosity they irradiate, Lo/LEdd, is plotted against the nuclear radio-loudness parameter: Seyferts are associated with relatively high radiative efficiencies Lo/LEdd ≳ 104 (and high accretion rates onto low mass black holes); LLRG are associated with low radiative efficiencies (and low accretion rates onto high black hole masses); all LINERs have low radiative efficiency (and accretion rates), and can be radio-loud or radio quiet depending on their black hole mass.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

Chiaberge, M., Capetti, A. & Celotti, A. 1999, A&A, 349, 77Google Scholar
Chiaberge, M., Capetti, A. & Macchetto, F. D. 2005, ApJ, 625, 716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvis, M. et al. 1994, ApJ Suppl., 95, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcke, H., Körding, E. & Markoff, S. 2004, A&A, 414, 895Google Scholar
Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V. & Sargent, W. L. W. 1997a, ApJ Suppl., 112, 315Google Scholar
Ho, L. C. 2004, in Multiwavelength AGN Surveys, 153Google Scholar
Merloni, A., Heinz, S. & diMatteo, T. Matteo, T. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar