Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T19:00:29.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of maintaining and redirecting infant attention on the production of referential communication in infants with and without Down syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2002

MARIA LEGERSTEE
Affiliation:
York University, Canada
JEAN VARGHESE
Affiliation:
York University, Canada
YOLANDA VAN BEEK
Affiliation:
University of Utrecht, Holland

Abstract

The effects of maternal interactive styles on the production of referential communication were assessed in four groups of infants whose chronological ages ranged between 0;6 and 1;8. Two groups of infants with Down syndrome (DS), one (n = 11) with a mean mental age (MA) of 0;8.6, and the other (n = 11) of 1;4.5, were matched on MA with two groups (n = 10 each) of typically developing infants. Infants were seen bi-monthly, for 8 months, with mothers, same-aged peers, and mothers of the peers. Results showed that High MA non-Down syndrome (ND) infants produced more words, and High MA DS infants produced more gestures when playing with mothers than peers. Mothers exhibited more attentional maintaining behaviours than peers, in particular to High MA infants, but they redirected the attentional focus of Low MA infants more. Sequential loglinear analyses revealed interesting contingencies between the interactive strategies of mothers and the referential communicative behaviours of their infants. Whereas maintaining attention increased, redirecting attention decreased the likelihood of the production of gestures and words in children. However, redirecting attention was followed by maintaining attention. Thus, mothers redirect the attentional focus in order to promote joint attention and referential communication. Furthermore, words and gestures of the children also promote joint attention in mothers. This highlights the reciprocal nature of these dynamic communicative interactions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was funded by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Scottish Rite Charitable Foundation to Maria Legerstee. We would like to thank the mothers and infants who participated in the study, the research team for help in data collection and coding, and Mirka Ondrack for statistical guidance.