Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:49:27.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archbishop Charles Riley, Theological Education and the Foundation of the University of Western Australia, 1903–c.1929

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Rowan Strong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper critically examines the role of Charles Riley, Bishop of Perth, in the foundation of the University of Western Australia in 1913. Riley advocated a modern university devoted to applied science, which would also include a humanities/arts component that would be able to deliver a liberal education. It goes on to explore what a ‘liberal education’ meant to Riley in connection with a theological education for clergy. It argues that Riley, and his successor Archbishop Le Fanu, desired a theological education for clergy connected with the university as productive of such a liberal education. Such an education would enable clergy to be leaders in society, capable of understanding modern issues in the context of faith, and able, by virtue of their education, to engage sympathetically with people of diverse backgrounds and views.

Keywords

theological educationclergyuniversityUniversity of Western AustraliaWestern AustraliaArchbishop Charles Rileyliberal education
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Anglican Studies , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , May 2015 , pp. 50 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Journal of Anglican Studies Trust 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

Rowan Strong is Professor of Church History at Murdoch University, Perth, Australia.

References

2. Alexander, Fred, Campus at Crawley: A Narrative and Critical Appreciation of the First Fifty Years of the University of Western Australia (Melbourne: The University of Western Australia Press, 1963), pp. 11–12.Google Scholar

3. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, p. 24 n. 97, pp. 36–37.Google Scholar

4. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, pp. 12–13, p. 24.Google Scholar

5. Charles Riley, Charge to Synod (1909), p. 26, Diocese of Perth Archives.Google Scholar

6. Report of the Royal Commission on the Establishment of a University (8 September 1910) Western Australia. Minutes and Votes and Proceedings of the Parliament, 1910–1911, Vol. II (Perth, 1911), pp. 42–44.Google Scholar

7. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, pp. 28–29, p. 40.Google Scholar

8. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, pp. 48–49.Google Scholar

9. Gregory, Jenny, Seeking Wisdom: A Centenary History of the University of Western Australia (Crawley, WA: UWA Publishing, 2013), p. 8.Google Scholar

10. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, pp. 48–49, p. 488.Google Scholar

11. The West Australian, 5 March 1913, p. 4.Google Scholar

12. The West Australian, 6 December 1913, p. 4.Google Scholar

13. Snape, Michael, The Royal Army Chaplains’ Department: Clergy under Fire (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2008), pp. 103–111; Hugh MacLeod, Religion and Society in England 1850–1915 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996), pp. 151–56.Google Scholar

14. Boyce, P.J., ‘The First Archbishop: Charles Owen Leaver Riley’, in Fred Alexander (ed.), Four Bishops and their See: Perth, Western Australia 1857–1957 (Nedlands, WA: University of Western Australia Press, 1957), pp. 48–52.Google Scholar

15. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, pp. 52–57.Google Scholar

16. Breward, Ian, A History of the Churches in Australasia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Breward, Churches in Australasia, pp. 138–39; Dickey, Brian, ‘Secular Advance and Diocesan Response 1861–1900’, in Bruce Kaye et al. (eds.), Anglicanism in Australia: A History (Carlton, Vic: Melbourne University Press, 2002), p. 59.Google Scholar

18. Dickey, ‘Secular Advance and Diocesan Response’, p. 60.Google Scholar

19. Judd, Stephen and Cable, Kenneth, Sydney Anglicans (Sydney: Anglican Information Office, 1987), pp. 57–61, 132–35.Google Scholar

20. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, p. 65.Google Scholar

21. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, p. 74.Google Scholar

22. Hawtrey, C.L.M., The Availing Struggle: A Record of the Planting and Development of the Church of England in Western Australia 1829–1947 (Perth, 1949), chs. 12, 13.Google Scholar

23. Riley, Charge to Synod (1912), p. 18, Diocese of Perth Archives.Google Scholar

24. Riley, Charge to Synod (1909), p. 26, Diocese of Perth Archives.Google Scholar

25. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar

26. Riley, Charge to Synod (1909), p. 26.Google Scholar

27. Newsome, David, The Victorian World Picture: Perceptions and Introspections in an Age of Change (London: John Murray, 1997), pp. 157–158.Google Scholar

28. Riley, Charge to Synod (1910), p. 20, Diocese of Perth Archives.Google Scholar

29. Riley, Charge to Synod (1911), pp. 5–16, Diocese of Perth Archives.Google Scholar

30. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, p. 102.Google Scholar

31. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, p. 48, p. 97.Google Scholar

32. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, p. 49.Google Scholar

33. Peter Boyce, ‘Riley, Charles Owen Leaver (1854–1929)’, Australian Dictionary of Biography, National Centre of Biography, Australian National University, http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/riley-charles-owen-leaver-8213/text14371, accessed 12 September 2013.Google Scholar

34. Mott, John R., The Future Leadership of the Church (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1909), p. 75.Google Scholar

35. Howard Hopkins, C., John R. Mott 1865–1955: A Biography (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1979), pp. 325–326.Google Scholar

36. Mott, Future Leadership, p. 65.Google Scholar

37. Mott, Future Leadership, p. 38, p. 112.Google Scholar

38. Patrick, Graham A., The Miners’ Bishop: Brooke Foss Westcott (Peterborough: Epworth Press, 2nd edn, 2004), p. 75.Google Scholar

39. Quoted in Patrick, The Miners’ Bishop, p. 205.Google Scholar

40. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, pp. 96–97; Alexander, Campus at Crawley, p. 512.Google Scholar

41. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, pp. 506–507.Google Scholar

42. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, pp. 513–15.Google Scholar

43. Boyce, ‘First Archbishop’, p. 104, pp. 184–85.Google Scholar

44. Alexander, Campus at Crawley, p. 520.Google Scholar

45. See the following email to me from the editor of the history of St George's: ‘Riley and Le Fanu did not intend that St George's would become a theological college, taking up where St John's had left off many years before. They would have been well aware of the requirement in the University Colleges Act 1926 that the College had to provide for University students only (though there was always a possibility of approaching the Senate for approval for “other classes of students” … Warden Law states clearly [in the 1932 college magazine]: “It is not a theological college, though we have, and it is to be hoped often will have, ordinands among our members, nor is there any special theological instruction given.” The reasons for not offering theological instruction remain a puzzle. Storrs, by this time installed as Sub-Warden, had been hand-picked by Le Fanu as “a priest qualified to teach the first year of theology.” It would seem Le Fanu had intended, in 1930, for this to happen at St George's, but if it were a full-time course it could well have been abandoned as contrary to the University Colleges Act’ (quoted with sender's permission; Brian Wills-Johnson to Rowan Strong, email of 25 September 2103, in author's possession).Google Scholar

46. Hedges, Paul M., ‘Architecture, Inculturation and Christian Mission: The Buildings of the Cambridge Mission to Delhi and their Meaning for the Church Today’, International Review of Missions, 89 (2000), pp. 180–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar