Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:59:23.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Confounding explanations. . . .

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

R. I. M Dunbar
R. I. M Dunbar
Affiliation:
Evolutionary Psychology Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, Nicholson Building, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GS, Englandrimd@liv.ac.uk www.liv.ac.uk/www/evolpsyc/main.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I argue that, while Finlay et al, are correct to suggest that there are developmental regularities (or constraints) acting on brain component evolution, they are incorrect to infer from this that a developmental explanation necessarily implies that structural changes preceded functional use. Developmental and functional (adaptationist) explanations are complementary, not alternatives.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 283
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)