Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:31:49.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review of doctoral research in English language education in the Philippines, Singapore and Malaysia (2007–2010)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2011

Rani Rubdy
Affiliation:
rani.rubdy@nie.edu.sg
T. Ruanni F. Tupas
Affiliation:
elcttr@nus.edu.sg
Corazon D. Villareal
Affiliation:
cdvillareal@yahoo.com
Maya Khemlani David
Affiliation:
mayadavid@yahoo.com
Francisco Perlas Dumanig
Affiliation:
fdumanig@yahoo.com

Abstract

This review highlights recent doctoral research in English language education and related areas completed between 2007 and 2010 in three countries in Southeast Asia: Singapore, Malaysia and the Philippines. Out of sixty dissertations initially chosen from major universities in these countries, five from the Philippines, four from Malaysia and three from Singapore were selected for review, the selection being based mainly on their quality of work and representation of key areas of intellectual work in the field in these countries. This review shows how the shared postcolonial identities of these countries and their unique sociohistorical locations help explain the coalescing and diverging agendas and trajectories in English language education doctoral research in the region. Much of the work affirms the dominant intellectual position of the West as the producer of knowledge, so there is a need to reposition the intellectual stance of research in English language education in the region within and emerging from its multilingual but unequally globalizing landscapes. Thus, there is an urgent need for more nuanced attention to socio-cultural factors that impact on English language education in the three countries under review, which, in turn, can help scholars produce new knowledge that can contribute to academic conversations in the field.

Type
Surveys of Ph.D. Theses
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bautista, M. L. (2004). Tagalog-English code switching as a mode of discourse. Asia-Pacific Education Review 5.2, 226233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baynham, M. (2004). Ethnographies of literacy: Introduction. Language and Education 18, 285290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. M. & Giles, H. (1984). Speech accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 46, 532.Google Scholar
Bolanos, E. A. (2010). Reading in print and hypertext environments: A comparative study of good L2 reading comprehension strategies. Ph.D. dissertation, De La Salle University, Manila.Google Scholar
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56289.Google Scholar
Canieso-Doronila, M. L. (1996). Landscapes of literacy: An ethnographic study of functional literacy in marginal Philippine communities. Hamburg & London: UNESCO & Luzac Oriental.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z. & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics 6, 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coiro, J. & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online comprehension strategies used by 6th grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the internet. Reading Research Quarterly 42, 214257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, M. K. (2007). Use of authentic data in the speaking classroom. In Ratwatte, H. & Herath, S. (eds.), English in the multilingual environment. Colombo: SLELTA, 111124.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning 47, 173210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. (1965). Who speaks what language to whom and when? In Li, W. (ed.) (2000), The bilingualism reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. The Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 221233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flores, E. R. (2010). Manipulative prototypes in leading online English newspapers in the Philippines: A critical discourse analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, De La Salle University, Manila.Google Scholar
Foltz, W. P. (1996). Comprehension, coherence and strategies in hypertext and linear text. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fontanini, I. (2004). Reading theories and some implications for the processing of linear texts and hypertexts. Linguagem and Ensino 7, 165184.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. & Lambert, W. (1972). Attitudes and motivations in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd edn). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Giles, H. & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J. & Coupland, N. (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. (1992). Basis of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1955). On facework: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Journal of the Study of Interpersonal Processes 18.3, 213231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonong, G. O. (2007). Image construction of a developing nation in a presidential rhetoric: A critical discourse analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Philippine Normal University.Google Scholar
Gustilo, L. (2006). Self-presentation in Filipino personal home pages: An analysis of contextual dimensions and expressive resources of computer-mediated communication. Ph.D. dissertation, De La Salle University.Google Scholar
Hong, H. Q. (2009). A corpus-based study of educational discourse: The score approach. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Ismail, R. (2008). Factors affecting less proficient ESL learners’ use of strategies for language and content area learning. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia.Google Scholar
Jawid, M. J. G. (2009). A descriptive analysis of the socio-cultural patterns of selected legal decisions of Philippine Regional Trial Courts. Ph.D. dissertation, De La Salle University, Manila.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (1995). Variation in phonological error in interlanguage talk. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1982). The other tongue. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning 16, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, P. (2009). Phonological intelligibility: A study of Malay and Chinese learners of English in Malaysia. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Koh, G. H. (2010). Preparing for school: An ethnographic study of young Chinese children's literacy learning. Ph.D. dissertation, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Kow, K. Y. C. (2009). Code-switching in the language classroom: A pedagogical tool? In David, M. K., McLellan, J., Rafik-Gaela, S. & Abdullah, A. N. (eds.), Code switching in Malaysia. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 121134.Google Scholar
Kramer-Dahl, A. (2001). Importing critical literacy pedagogy: Does it have to fail? Language and Education 15.1, 1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. In Giglioli, P. (ed.) (1972). Language in its social context. New York: Penguin Books, 203208.Google Scholar
Lee, M. H. S. (1999). Communication and advocacy strategies: Adolescent reproductive and sexual health. Bangkok: UNESCO PROAP.Google Scholar
Leki, I. (1991). Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies. TESOL Quarterly 25, 123143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. (1998). The why and how questions in the analysis of conversational code switching. In Auer, P. (ed.), Code switching in conversation. New York: Routledge, 156175.Google Scholar
Lorente, B. P. (2007). Mapping English linguistic capital: The case of Filipino domestic workers in Singapore. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Luke, A. (2004). On the material consequences of literacy. Language and Education 18, 331335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macknish, C. J. (2009). Evidence of critical reading expressed in Chinese students’ group discussions of texts. Ed.D. dissertation, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Mante, M. J. S. (2009). Dimensions of motivation to read and metacognitive reading strategies as predictors of reading comprehension among Filipino bilinguals. Ph.D. dissertation, De La Salle University, Manila.Google Scholar
Mascuñana, E. (2007). Politeness and Cebuano directives: A linguistic and socio-cultural study, University of the Philippines Diliman.Google Scholar
Miike, Y. (2010). Culture as text and culture as theory: Asiacentricity and its raison d'être in intercultural communication research. In Nakayama, T. K. & Halualani, R. T. (eds.), The handbook of critical intercultural communication. Chichester, UK: Blackwell, 190215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. E., Lloyd, R. & McPherson, P. (2006). Teacher and learner use of the new technologies in AMEP. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Nair, P. (2008). The effects of scaffolding training on literary text comprehension among adult ESL learners. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia.Google Scholar
Nayan, S. & Jusoff, K. (2009). A study of subject-verb agreement: From novice writers to expert writers. International Education Studies 3.3, 190194.Google Scholar
Noor, N. F. M. (2008). Communication strategies of ESL speakers in interaction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Malaya.Google Scholar
Norton Pierce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29.1, 929.Google Scholar
Ong, J. (2010). The effects of planning and revising on Chinese ESL learners’ text quality. Ph.D. dissertation, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Palma, J. P. (2008). The rhetoric of self- and other-presentation in computer-mediated communication (CMC) context: a discourse analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Philippine Normal University.Google Scholar
Pascasio, E. (ed.) (1977). The Filipino bilingual: Studies on Philippine bilingualism and bilingual education. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. & Blackledge, A. (eds.) (2004). Negotiation of identities in multilingual contexts. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Png, J. L. H. (2007). The use of scaffolding through think-alouds and reciprocal teaching in the teaching of reading comprehension to lower secondary students in two Singaporean schools. Ed.D. dissertation, Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources and syllabus design: A triadic framework for investigating task influences on SLA. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 287318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2003). The Cognition Hypothesis, task design and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies 21, 45105.Google Scholar
Salonga, A. (2010). Language and situated agency: An exploration of the dominant linguistic and communication practices in the Philippine offshore call centers. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1965). What is a speech act? In Giglioli, P. (ed.) (1972), Language and social context. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books, 136154.Google Scholar
Serquina, G. P. (2010). Attributes of effective reading programs among high-performing, high-poverty public elementary schools in the Philippines. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Sharbawi, S. b. H. (2009). An acoustic investigation of the segmental features of educated Brunei English speech. Ph.D. dissertation, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Sibayan, B. (1999). The intellectualization of Filipino and other essays in sociolinguistics and education. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). Psycholinguistic processes in language use and language learning. A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Soe, M. L. (2007). Specifying narrativity in an institutionalized live oral storytelling performance: An interactive approach. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Songcuan, E. J. (2009). Psycholinguistic extracts and socio-cultural imprints in job application discourses: A genre analysis of moves and strategies. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stubbs, M. (1996). Text and corpus analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tan, P. S. J. (2007). An ethnography of the literary practices of children in Malaysian residential care. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Tan, S. K. (2010). An acoustic investigation of the segmental and suprasegmentals of Malaysia English. Ph.D. dissertation, Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Teng, S. M. (2007). Power and identity in a community of academic literary practice: An ethnographic study of undergraduates in Singapore. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Teo, L. N. (2009). Lexis in compositions of ESL students in a selected University College in Nilai, Malaysia. Ph.D. dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia.Google Scholar
Termulo, M. G. (2005). High poverty, high performing public secondary schools: A model for educational management. Ph.D. dissertation, University of the Philippines, Diliman.Google Scholar
Ting, S. H. & Lau, L. Y. (2008). Lexical and discourse-based communication strategies of Malaysian ESL learners. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research 4, 1831.Google Scholar
Tupas, T. R. F. (ed.) (2007). (Re)making society: The politics of language, discourse, and identity in the Philippines. Quezon City: University of the Philippines Press.Google Scholar
Valdez, P. (2008). The Filipino bilingual's cultural competence: A model based on Filipino–English code switching. Ph.D. dissertation, Philippine Normal University.Google Scholar
Villegas, S. G. (2010). Authorial voices in journal articles: A contrastive rhetoric study. Ph.D. dissertation, De La Salle University.Google Scholar
Wee, S. H. (2009). A systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis (SF–MDA) approach to Sars newspaper advertisements in Singapore. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Wengao, G. (2009). Linguistic variation and identity representation in personal blogs: A corpus-linguistic approach. Ph.D. dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Williams, M. & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar