Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T02:30:21.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Historical Inference and Event-Structure Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2010

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Event-structure analysis (ESA) is a member of a family of formal analytic procedures designed to analyze and interpret text, in particular the temporal sequences constituting the narrative of a historical event. Its basic purpose is to aid the analyst in “unpacking” an event – that is, in breaking it into constituent parts – and analytically reconstituting it as a causal interpretation of what happened and why it happened as it did. ESA focuses on and exploits an event's “narrativity” – its temporal orderliness, connectedness and unfolding – thereby helping historians and social scientists infer causal links between actions in an event, identify its contingencies and follow their consequences, and explore its myriad sequential patterns. Unlike most other formal analytical techniques, it is completely non-numeric and non-statistical: ESA's value is largely heuristic and centered on how it relentlessly probes the analyst's construction, comprehension and interpretation of the event.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1998

References

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Corsaro, William and Heise, David, “Event Structure Models from Ethnographic Data”, Sociological Methodology, 1990 (1990), pp. 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, David, “Computer Analysis of Cultural Structures”, Social Science Computer Review, 6 (1988), pp. 183196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, David, “Modeling Event Structures”, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 14 (1989), pp. 139169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heise, David, and Lewis, Elsa, Introduction to ETHNO (Raleigh, NC, 1988).Google Scholar
Griffin, Larry J., “Narrative, Event-Structure Analysis and Causal Interpretation in Historical Sociology”, American Journal of Sociology, 98 (1993), pp. 10941133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Cliff and Bruggemann, John, “Mobilizing Interracial Solidarity: A Comparison of the 1919 and 1937 Steel Industry Labor Organizing Drives”, Mobilization, 2 (1997), pp. 4770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Larry J. and Korstad, Robert R., “Class as Race and Gender: The Making and Breaking of a Union Local in the Jim Crow South”, Social Science History, 19 (1985), pp. 425454.Google Scholar
Griffin, Larry J., Clark, Paula and Sandberg, Joanne, “Narrative and Event: Historical Sociology and Lynching”, in Brundage, Fitzhugh (ed.), Under Sentence of Death: Lynching in the New South (Chapel Hill, NC, 1997).Google Scholar
Isaac, Larry Debra Street and Knapp, Stan, “Analyzing Historical Contingency with Formal Methods: The Case of the ‘Relief Explosion’ and 1968”, Sociological Methods and Research, 23 (1994), pp. 114141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiser, Edgar, “The Revival of Narrative in Historical Sociology: What Rational Choice Can Contribute”, Politics and Society, 24 (1996), pp. 249271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar