Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T19:09:21.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gravity tests with INPOP planetary ephemerides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

A. Fienga
Affiliation:
Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France Observatoire de Besançon- CNRS UMR6213, 41bis Av. de l'Observatoire, 25000 Besançon
J. Laskar
Affiliation:
Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
P. Kuchynka
Affiliation:
Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
C. Leponcin-Lafitte
Affiliation:
SYRTE-CNRS UMR8630, Observatoire de Paris, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, France
H. Manche
Affiliation:
Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
M. Gastineau
Affiliation:
Astronomie et Systèmes Dynamiques, IMCCE-CNRS UMR8028, 77 Av. Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present here several gravity tests made with the latest INPOP08 planetary ephemerides. We first propose two methods to estimate the PPN parameter β and its correlated value, the Sun J2, and we discuss the correlation between the Sun J2 and the mass of the asteroid ring. We estimate a possible advance in the planet perihelia. We also show that no constant acceleration larger than 1/4 of the Pioneer anomaly is compatible with the observed motion of the planets in our Solar System.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Anderson, J. D., Laing, P. A., Lau, E. L., Liu, A. S., Nieto, M. M., & Turyshev, S. G., 2002, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 082004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertotti, B., Iess, L., & Tortora, P., 2003, Nature, 425, 374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fienga, A., Manche, H., Laskar, J., & Gastineau, M., 2009, JOURNEES-2008/Astrometry, Geodynamics and Astronomical Reference SystemsGoogle Scholar
Fienga, A., Manche, H., Laskar, J., & Gastineau, M., 2008, A&A, 477, 315Google Scholar
Iorio, L., 2009, AJ, 137, 3615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopeikin, S. & Makarov, V., 2008, IAU Symposium, 248, 391Google Scholar
Lambert, S. & Le Poncin-Lafitte, C., 2009, A&A, 499, 331Google Scholar
Moyer, T. D., 1981, Cel. Mech., 23, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuchynka, P., Laskar, J., Fienga, A., Manche, H., & Somenzi, L., 2009, JOURNEES-2008/Astrometry, Geodynamics and Astronomical Reference SystemsGoogle Scholar
Pitjeva, E. V., 1986, Byull. Inst. T. A., Ross. Akad. Nauk., 15, 538Google Scholar
Pitjeva, E. V., 2009, JOURNEES-2008/Astrometry, Geodynamics and Astronomical Reference SystemsGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, S. S., Davis, J. L., Lebach, D. E., & Gregory, J. S., 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 121101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Will, C. M., 2006, Living Rev. Relativity, 9, 3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Will, C. M., 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York, U.S.A.2nd editionGoogle Scholar
Will, C. M., 1971, Astrophys. J., 163, 611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. G., Turyshev, S. G., & Boggs, D. H., 2009, Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. D, arXiv, gr-qc0507083v2Google Scholar