Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-qmf6w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T07:15:01.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does the British State's Categorisation of ‘Mixed Race’ Meet Public Policy Needs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2009

Peter J. Aspinall
Peter J. Aspinall*
Affiliation:
Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent E-mail: P.J.Aspinall@kent.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The England and Wales 2001 Census was the first to include ‘Mixed’ categories which have now been adopted across government. The four ‘cultural background’ options were highly prescriptive, specifying combinations of groups. This paper assesses how satisfactorily these analytical categories captured self-ascribed cultural affiliation based on the criteria of validity, reliability and utility of the data for public services. Finally, the paper asks whether we now need a census question on ethnic origin/ancestry in addition to – or instead of – ethnic group or whether multi-ticking or a focus on family origins might give more useful public policy data and better measure the population's ethnic diversity.

Type
Articles
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , January 2010 , pp. 55 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B. (1991), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. A. (2005), The Ethics of Identity, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aspinall, P. J. (1995), The Development of an Ethnic Group Question for the 2001 Census: The Findings of a Consultation Exercise with Members of the OPCS 2001 Census Working Subgroup, London: SE Institute of Public Health, United Medical and Dental Schools.Google Scholar
Aspinall, P. J. (2003)a, ‘The conceptualisation and categorisation of mixed race/ethnicity in Britain and North America: identity options and the role of the state’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 269–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, P. J. (2003)b, Analytical Report on the Feasibility of Using Ethnic Questions for Risk Status Ascertainment in Antenatal Selective Screening for Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia: The Findings of a Formal Trial of Candidate Questions, Canterbury: University of Kent.Google Scholar
Aspinall, P. J., Song, M. and Hashem, F. (2006), ‘Mixed race in Britain: a survey of the preferences of mixed race people for terminology and classifications’, Canterbury, CHSS, http://www.pih.org.uk/features/mixedraceinbritain_report2.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bentley, M., Mattingly, T., Hough, C. and Bennett, C. (2003), Census Quality Survey to Evaluate Responses to the Census 2000 Question on Race: An Introduction to the Data, Census 2000 Evaluation B.3, Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google Scholar
Berrington, A. (1996), ‘Marriage patterns and inter-ethnic unions’, in Coleman, D. and Salt, J. (eds.), Ethnicity in the 1991 Census: Vol. 1 Demographic Characteristics of Ethnic Minority Populations, London: HMSO, pp. 178–212.Google Scholar
Berthoud, R. (1998), ‘Defining ethnic groups: origin or identity?’, Patterns of Prejudice, 32, 2, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, R., Loveman, M. and Stamatov, P. (2004), ‘Ethnicity as cognition’, Theory and Society, 33, 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, M. (2000), Multiracial Identity: An International Perspective, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, D. (1985), ‘Inter-ethnic marriage in Great Britain’, Population Trends, 30, 1–10.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1970), The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. Gordon, C., Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1982), ‘The subject and power’, Afterword to Herbert L. Dreyfus and Paul Rabinow, Michael Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, Brighton: Harvester Press, pp. 208–26.Google Scholar
Funderberg, L. (1994), Black, White, Other: Biracial Americans Talk About Race and Identity, New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Georghiou, T. and Thorlby, R. (2007), Quality of ethnicity coding in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES): Beyond Completeness, London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. T. (1997), ‘Taking stock: counting by race’, Racial Subjects: Writing on Race in America, New York: Routledge, pp. 27–58.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1986), ‘Making up people’, in Heller, T. C., Sosna, M. and Wellbery, D. E. (eds.), Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 222–36.Google Scholar
Harris, M., Consorte, J. G., Lang, J. and Byrne, B. (1993), ‘Who are the Whites? Imposed Census categories and the racial demography of Brazil’, Social Forces, 72, 2, 451–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, B., Fitzpatrick, J. and Aspinall, P. J. (2005), Indications of Public Health in the English Regions: Vol. 4, Ethnicity and Health, London: Association of Public Health Observatories.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. (1996), Social Identity, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. (2006), Somewhere to go? Something to do? London Borough of Newham Young Peoples Survey, Final Report, Northampton: Mattersoffact.Google Scholar
Jones, N. A. and Smith, A. S. (2001), The Two or More Races Population: 2000, Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.Google ScholarPubMed
Lumpkin, J. R. (2001), Letter from Chair of the US National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, Subcommittee on Populations to Katherine K. Wallman, Chief Statistician, Office of Management and Budget.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, M. (2005), ‘Inter-ethnic unions’, Data Management and Analysis Group Update 2005–12, Greater London Authority, London.Google Scholar
McKenney, N. R. and Bennett, C. E. (1994), ‘Issues regarding data on race and ethnicity: the Census Bureau experience’, Public Health Reports, 109, 1, 16–25.Google ScholarPubMed
Model, S. and Fisher, G. (2002), ‘Unions between Blacks and Whites: England and the US compared’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 728–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nazroo, J. Y. (1997), The Health of Britain's Ethnic Minorities: Findings from a National Survey, London: Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Parker, D. and Song, M. (eds.) (2001), Rethinking ‘Mixed Race’, London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, W. (1987), ‘Politics and the measurement of ethnicity’, in Alonso, W. and Starr, P. (eds.), The Politics of Numbers, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Platt, L., Akinwale, B. and Simpson, L. (2005), ‘Stability and change in ethnic group in England and Wales’, Population Trends, 121, 35–45.Google Scholar
Rockquemore, K. A. and Brunsma, D. (2002), Beyond Black: Biracial Identity in America, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sillitoe, K. and White, P. H. (1992), ‘Ethnic group and the British census: the search for a question’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 155, 1, 141–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, S. (2001), ‘Colour, culture and class: interrogating interracial marriage and people of mixed racial descent in the USA’, in Parker, D. and Song, M., Rethinking ‘Mixed Race’, London: Pluto Press, pp. 117–33.Google Scholar
Smith, K. (2002), ‘Some critical observations on the use of the concept of “ethnicity” in Modood et al., “Ethnic Minorities in Britain”’, Sociology, 36, 2, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, P. W. F., McDonald, J. W., Forster, J. J. and Berrington, A. (1996), ‘Monte Carlo exact methods used for analysing interethnic unions in Great Britain’, Applied Statistics, 45, 2, 191–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, M. (2003), Choosing Ethnic Identity, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. (2002), Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Race and the Intimate in Colonial Rule, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada (2004), 2001 Census Ethnic Origin User Guide, Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1994), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (ed. Gutmann, Amy), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, C., McKay, R., Kojetin, B., Harrison, R., de la Puente, M., Stinson, L. and Robison, E. (1996), BLS Statistical Notes No. 40: Testing Methods of Collecting Racial and Ethnic Information, Results of the Current Population Survey Supplement on Race and Ethnicity, Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.Google Scholar
Werbner, P. (1990), The Migration Process: Capital, Gifts and Offerings among British Pakistanis, London: Berg.Google Scholar
Yanow, D. (2002), Constructing ‘Race’ and ‘Ethnicity’ in America. Category-Making in Public Policy and Administration, Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (2000), Inclusion and Democracy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Young, R. J. C. (1995), Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race, London: Routledge.Google Scholar