Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:28:07.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2009

Jonathan Harrington ,
Sallyanne Palethorpe  and
Catherine Watson
Jonathan Harrington
Affiliation:
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science and Speech Hearing and Language Research Centre, Macquarie University, NSW 2109 Sydney, Australiajmh@shlrc.mq.edu.au
Sallyanne Palethorpe
Affiliation:
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science and Speech Hearing and Language Research Centre, Macquarie University, NSW 2109 Sydney, Australiajmh@shlrc.mq.edu.au
Catherine Watson
Affiliation:
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science and Speech Hearing and Language Research Centre, Macquarie University, NSW 2109 Sydney, Australiajmh@shlrc.mq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we analyse the extent to which an adult's vowel space is affected by vowel changes to the community using a database of nine Christmas broadcasts made by Queen Elizabeth II spanning three time periods (the 1950's; the late 1960's/early 70's; the 1980's). An analysis of the monophthongal formant space showed that the first formant frequency was generally higher for open vowels, and lower for mid-high vowels in the 1960's and 1980's data than in the 1950's data, which we interpret as an expansion of phonetic height from earlier to later years. The second formant frequency showed a more modest compression in later, compared with earlier years: in general, front vowels had a decreased F2 in later years, while F2 of the back vowels was unchanged except for [u] which had a higher F2 in the 1960's and 1980's data. We also show that the majority of these Fl and F2 changes were in the direction of the vowel positions of 1980's Standard Southern British speakers reported in Deterding (1997). Our general conclusion is that there is evidence of accent change within the same individual over time and that the Queen's vowels in the Christmas broadcasts have shifted in the direction of a more mainstream form of Received Pronunciation.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 30 , Issue 1-2 , December 2000 , pp. 63 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauer, L. (1985). Tracing phonetic change in the received pronunciation of British English. Journal of Phonetics. 13, 61–81.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1992). The second great vowel shift revisited. English World-Wide. 13, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, M. E., Ayers Elam, G. (1994/1997). Guide to ToBI Labelling – Version 3.0. Electronic text and accompanying audio example files available at http://ling.ohiostate.edu/Phonetics/E_ToBl/etobi_homepage.html.Google Scholar
Burridge, K. (1998). English in Australia and New Zealand: an Introduction. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill, P. (1980). Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coggle, P. (1993). Do you speak Estuary? London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cox, F. (1999). Vowel change in Australian English. Phonetica, 56, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crystal, D. (1995). Estuary English. In Crystal, D., Cambridge Encyclopaedia of the English Language, 327. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Also available from the website in Wells (2000) listed below).Google Scholar
De Jong, K. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 491–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deterding, D. (1997). The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 27, 47–55.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1988). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society, 17, 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J., Beckman, M. E., & Fletcher, J. (1991). The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 369–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, C. A. & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1966, 1975, 1980). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English (1st, 2nd, and 3rd editions). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. & Cruttenden, A. (1994). Gimson's Pronunciation of English (5th edition, revised by Cruttenden, Alan). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gordon, E., Lewis, G. & Trudgill, P. (1998). New-dialect formation and Southern Hemisphere English: the New Zealand short front vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 2, 35–51.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Fletcher, J. & Beckman, M. E., (2000). Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English. In Broe, M. (editor), Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 5, 40–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. & Cassidy, S. (1999). Techniques in Speech Acoustics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson, C.I. (2000). Does the Queen speak the Queen's English? Nature, 408, 927–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henton, C. (1983). Changes in the vowels of received pronunciation. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 353–371.Google Scholar
Hunnicutt, S. (1987). Acoustic correlates of redundancy and intelligibility. Speech Transmission Laboratory, Quarterly Progress Status Report, 2–3,7–14.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. (1997). Talker Variability in Speech Processing. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2, 205–254.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1964). Acoustical Characteristics of Selected English Consonants. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Llndblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. & Marchal, A. (editors), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Maidment, J. A. (1994). Estuary English: Hybrid or hype? Paper presented at the 4th New Zealand Conference on Language & Society, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand, August, 1994. (The full text is available from the website given in Wells, 2000, below).Google Scholar
Moon, S-J., & Lindblom, B. (1994). Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed words, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G. E. (1961). Parameters of vowel quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 4, 10–29.Google Scholar
Pols, L., Tromp, H. & Plomp, R. (1973). Frequency analysis of Dutch vowels from 50 male speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 53, 1093–1101.Google Scholar
Rastatter, M., McGuire, R., Kalinowski, J. & Stuart, A. (1997). Formant frequency characteristics of elderly speakers in contextual speech. Folia Phoniatrica, 49, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roach, P. (1997) The Daniel Jones English Pronouncing Dictionary. What is new in the 15th edition? Keynote speech presented to EPTA, Japan, 1997. http://www.linguistics.reading.ac.uk/staff/Peter.Roach/PAPERS/epta97.htmGoogle Scholar
Roach, P., Knowles, G., Varadi, T. & Arnfield, S. (1994). MARSEC: A Machine-Readable Spoken English Corpus. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 23, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosewarne, D. (1984). Estuary English. Times Educational Supplement, 19. (The full text is available from the website in Wells, 2000 listed below).Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1983). On Dialect. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1988). Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. English World-Wide, 9, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, C., Mclagan, M. & Harrington, J. (in press). Acoustic evidence for vowel change in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1962). A study of the formants of the pure vowels of British English. MA Thesis. University College London.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambrisge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. (2000). Web documents relating to Estuary English. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/estuary/home.htmGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, M. (1994). Phonetic evidence for sound change in Quebec French. In Keating, P.A. (ed.) Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III., 267–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicker, E. (1961). Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 248.Google Scholar