Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T09:04:46.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An overview of IPA Braille: An updated tactile representation of the International Phonetic Alphabet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2009

Robert Englebretson*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Rice Universityreng@rice.edu

Abstract

This article provides an overview of IPA Braille, revised and updated by Englebretson (2008) under the auspices of the International Council on English Braille (ICEB). After a brief introduction to braille as a writing system and a review of the disparate braille notations formerly used for phonetics, the author discusses the need for a single, up-to-date, linguistically-informed braille notation for the IPA. The author then outlines the rationale and procedures used in developing IPA Braille, and presents an appendix of the complete charts showing the braille equivalents for all symbols of the current IPA (revised to 2005). This article is relevant to phoneticians interested in applications of the IPA, linguists interested in writing systems, instructors who may have blind students enrolled in phonetics and linguistics courses, and especially to blind students and professionals needing access to a complete, updated braille IPA notation. The publication of the full braille charts in JIPA ensures that IPA Braille is available to the wider community of phoneticians and linguists, who typically do not have access to the literature from specialized braille publishing houses.

Type
The International Phonetic Alphabet
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAWB (American Association of Workers for the Blind). 1977. Code of braille textbook formats and techniques. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Esling, John H. & Dickson, B. Craig. 1995. The VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 25, 7180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BANA (Braille Authority of North America). 1994. English braille, American edition, revised 2002. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.Google Scholar
BANA. 1997a. Braille formats: Principles of print to braille transcription. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.Google Scholar
BANA. 1997b. Music braille code. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.Google Scholar
BANA. 2000. Computer braille code, revised 2000. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.Google Scholar
BAUK (Braille Authority of the United Kingdom). 1990. The International Phonetic Alphabet (revised to 1979). London: Royal National Institute of Blind People.Google Scholar
BAUK. 2004. British braille: A restatement of Standard English Braille. London: Royal National Institute of Blind People.Google Scholar
BAUK. 2005. Braille mathematics notation. London: Royal National Institute of Blind People.Google Scholar
BAUK. 2006. Braille computer notation. London: Royal National Institute of Blind People.Google Scholar
BAUK. 2008. Braille science notation. London: Royal National Institute of Blind People.Google Scholar
Bogart, Darleen, Cranmer, Tim V. & Sullivan, Joseph E.. 2000. Unifying the braille codes. In NLS, 160–181.Google Scholar
Dixon, Judith M. 2000. Refreshable braille displays: Their origins and evolution. In NLS, 348–373.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Carlton. 1979. Braille literacy: The best route to equal education. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 73, 331333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert (ed.). 2008. IPA Braille: An updated tactile representation of the International Phonetic Alphabet, 2 vols. Toronto: CNIB. http://www.iceb.org/icebipa.htm.Google Scholar
Gray, Sarah. 2006. Evaluation of the braille system used for phonetic transcription and suggestions for its improvement. BSc Honors thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric P. & Catón, Hilda. 1984. A fresh look at the sign system of the braille code. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 78, 210214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampshire, Barry. 1981. Working with braille: A study of braille as a medium of communication. Paris: UNESCO Press.Google Scholar
IPA (International Phonetic Association). 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lorimer, Pamela. 1996. A critical evaluation of the historical development of the tactile modes of reading and an analysis and evaluation of researches carried out in endeavours to make the braille code easier to read and to write. Ph.D. thesis, School of Education, University of Birmingham. http://www.braille.org/papers/lorimer/title.html.Google Scholar
Mellor, C. Michael. 2006. Louis Braille: A touch of genius. Boston, MA: National Braille Press.Google Scholar
Merrick, W. Percy & Potthoff, W.. 1934. A braille notation of the International Phonetic Alphabet (1932) with key-words and specimen texts. London: The National Institute for the Blind.Google Scholar
Millar, Susanna. 1997. Reading by touch. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nemeth, Abraham. 1972. The Nemeth Braille Code for mathematics and science notation. Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.Google Scholar
NLS (National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped). 2000. Braille into the next millennium. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped.Google Scholar
Poole, William B. L. 1982. Braille as an autonomous script. In Evensen, Richard H. (ed.), The International Conference on English Braille Grade 2, 181198. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Ladusaw, William A.. 1996. Phonetic symbol guide, 2nd edn. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quick, Edith E. 1936. Announcement of ‘W. P. Merrick & W. Potthof [sic], A braille notation of the phonetic alphabet’. Le Maître Phonétique: Organe de l'Association Phonétique de Professeurs de Langues Vivantes 51, 51.Google Scholar
Ryles, Ruby. 1996. The impact of braille reading skills on employment, income, education, and reading habits. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 90, 219226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryles, Ruby. 2000. Braille as a predictor of success. In NLS, 462–491.Google Scholar
Sadato, Norihiro. 2005. How the blind ‘see’ braille: Lessons from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Neuroscientist 11, 577582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, Fredric K. 1989. Literacy: The key to opportunity. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 83, 290293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Fredric K. 1996. Perceptions of braille usage by legally blind adults. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 90, 210218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Fredric K. 2000. Braille in the workplace. In NLS, 296–313.Google Scholar
Stephens, Otis. 1989. Braille – implications for living. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 83, 288289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenberken, Sabriye. 2003. My path leads to Tibet: The inspiring story of how one young blind woman brought hope to the blind children of Tibet. New York: Arcade.Google Scholar
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 1990. World braille usage, revised edition. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped.Google Scholar
Wells-Jensen, Sheri. 2005. The braille International Phonetic Alphabet and other options: The blind student in the phonetics classroom. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35, 221230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittenstein, Stuart Harold. 1993. Is braille a language? Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 87, 132133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar