Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-26T21:38:26.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesizing life history theory with sexual selection: Toward a comprehensive model of alternative reproductive strategies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2009

Jenée James Jackson
Affiliation:
Division of Family Studies and Human Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0078. jeneej@email.arizona.edubjellis@email.arizona.edu
Bruce J. Ellis
Affiliation:
Division of Family Studies and Human Development, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0078. jeneej@email.arizona.edubjellis@email.arizona.edu

Abstract

Del Giudice's model of sex-specific attachment patterns demonstrates the usefulness of infusing life history theory with principles of sexual selection. We believe a full synthesis between the two theories provides a foundation for a comprehensive model of alternative reproductive strategies. We extend Del Giudice's ideas based on our own program of research, focusing specifically on the importance of intrasexual competition and the individual phenotype during development.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. & Draper, P. (1991) Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development 62:647–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J. (2004) Timing of pubertal maturation in girls: An integrated life history approach. Psychological Bulletin 130:920–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, B. J. & Garber, J. (2000) Psychosocial antecedents of variation in girls' pubertal timing: Maternal depression, stepfather presence, and marital and family stress. Child Development 71:485501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figueredo, A. J. & Jacobs, W. J. (2000) Strategic pluralism through a Brunswikian lens. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:603604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangestad, S. W. & Simpson, J. A. (2000) The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:573–87; discussion 597–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, M. R. (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:9298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, J. J. & Ellis, B. J. (submitted) The development of human reproductive strategies: toward a comprehensive model.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. J., Ellis, B. J. & Garber, J. (submitted) Sex differences in the developmental antecedents of life history strategies: Tests of an integrated theory.Google Scholar
Thiessen, D. (1994) Environmental tracking by females: Sexual lability. Human Nature 5:167202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed