Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:42:51.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuity and Change in Attitudes Toward Abortion: Poland and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2005

Ted G. Jelen  and
Clyde Wilcox
Ted G. Jelen
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas and DePauw University
Clyde Wilcox
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, we seek to describe and explain changes in mass abortion attitudes in Poland and the United States. Both countries exhibit modest, but significant, declines in support for legal abortion during the 1990s and early years of the twenty-first century. When compositional, structural, and period effects are estimated separately, both countries exhibit strong pro-life period effects beginning in the late 1990s. In Poland, compositional effects exert pro-choice pressure but are counteracted by strong pro-life structural effects. By contrast, compositional effects in the United States are rather weak, but strong pro-choice structural effects are offset by pro-life period effects. The latter result is attributed to strategic framing of the abortion issue by pro-life elites.A version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 2004. Thanks are due David Damore, Kenneth Fernandez, Sheila Lambert, Jonathan Strand, Matthew Wetstein, and Melanie Young for valuable comments and assistance.

Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 297 - 317
Copyright
© 2005 The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan. 1995. “It's Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.” Journal of Politics 57 (February): 176–86.Google Scholar
Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (July): 718–37.Google Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and John Brehm. 1995. “American Ambivalence Toward Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroskedastic Probit Model.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (October): 1055–92.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy A. 2002. “The Challenge of Pluralism: The Catholic Church in Democratic Poland.” In Religion and Politics in Comparative Perspective: The One, the Few, and the Many, ed. Ted G. Jelen and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Cambridge University Press, 26–44.
Chandler, Marthe A., Elizabeth Adell Cook, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1994. “Abortion in the United States and Canada: A Comparative Study of Public Opinion.” In Abortion Politics in the United Stated and Canada: Studies in Public Opinion, ed. Ted G. Jelen and Marthe A. Chandler. Westport, CT: Praeger, 131–44.
Cohen, Jacob, and Patricia Cohen. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlational Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
Converse, Philip E., and Gregory Markus. 1979. “Plus Ça Change … : The New CPS Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 73 (March): 32–49.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1994a. “Issue Voting in U.S. Senate Elections: The Abortion Issue in 1990.” Congress and the Presidency 21 (Fall): 99–112.Google Scholar
Cook, Elizabeth Adell, Ted G. Jelen, and Clyde Wilcox. 1994b. “Issue Voting in Gubernatorial Elections: Abortion and Post-Webster Politics.” Journal of Politics 56 (February): 187–99.Google Scholar
Davies, Norman. 1982. God's Playground: A History of Poland. 2 vols. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dillon, Michele. 1996. “Cultural Differences in the Abortion Discourse of the Catholic Church: Evidence From Four Countries.” Sociology of Religion 57 (Spring): 25–36.Google Scholar
Eberts, Mirella W. 1998. “The Roman Catholic Church and Democracy in Poland.” Europe-Asia Studies 50 (July):817–42.Google Scholar
Ferree, Myra Marx, William Anthony Gamson, Jurgen Gerhards, and Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping Abortion Discourse: Democracy and the Public Sphere in Germany and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Franceschet, Susan. 2004. “Explaining Social Movement Outcomes: Collective Action Frames and Strategic Choices in First and Second-Wave Feminism in Chile.” Comparative Political Studies 37 (June): 499–530.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Lianne C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: The U.S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83 (September): 751–71.Google Scholar
Freedman, Paul. 2004. The Manipulation of Ambivalence: Public Opinion and the Framing of the Abortion Debate. Unpublished manuscript, Georgetown University.
Girard, Francoise, and Wanda Nowicka. 2002. “Clear and Compelling Evidence: The Polish Tribunal on Abortion Rights.” Reproductive Health Matters 10 (May): 22–30.Google Scholar
Harris v. McRae. 1980. 448 U.S. 297.
Jelen, Ted G., and Clyde Wilcox. 1997. “Attitudes Toward Abortion in Poland and the United States.” Social Science Quarterly 78 (September): 907–21.Google Scholar
Kaiser Daily Reproductive Health Report. 2003. “Polish Voters Approve Entry Into European Union, Despite Fears Over ‘Relaxed Stance’ on Abortion.” http://kaisernetwork.org (June 10, 2005).
Kelley, Jonathan, M. D. R. Evans, and Bruce Headey. 1993. “Moral Reasoning and Political Conflict: The Abortion Conflict.” British Journal of Sociology 44 (September): 589–612.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1985. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Maher v. Roe. 1977. 432 U.S. 464.
Maxwell, Carol. 2002. Pro-Life Activists in America: Meaning, Motivation, and Direct Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Norrander, Barbara, and Clyde Wilcox. 1999. “Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (August): 701–22.Google Scholar
Nowicka, Wanda. 1997. “Reproductive Health: Women in Poland.” http://www.fedora.org.pl/english/report97/index97.htm (December 11, 2004).
Penn, Shana. 2001. “Breaking the Silence: How Poland Jeopardizes Women's Health and Rights.” http://www.fedora.org.pl/english/news/tribunal/shana_penn.htm (March 3, 2005).
Saletan, William. 2003. Bearing Right: How Conservatives Won the Abortion War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sharpe, Elaine B. 1999. The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Public Policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Snow, David A., and Robert D. Benford. 1992. “Master Frames and Cycles of Protest.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Aldon Morris and Carol McClurg Mueller. New Haven: Yale University Press, 133–45.
Sullins, D. Paul. 1999. “Catholic/Protestant Trends on Abortion: Convergence and Polarity.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 38 (September): 354–69.Google Scholar
Taras, Ray, 2003. “Poland's Transition to a Democratic Republic: The Taming of the Sacred?” In The Secular and the Sacred: Nation, Religion, and Politics, ed. William Safran. London: Frank Cass, 137–54.
Tribe, Laurence H. 1992. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: Norton.
Wetstein, Matthew. 1996. Abortion Rates in the United States: The Influence of Opinion and Policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Ted G. Jelen. 2002. “Religion, Religiosity, and Partisanship: Changing Correlates of Attitudes Toward Abortion.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 31–September 3.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Barbara Norrander. 2002. “Of Mood and Morals: The Dynamics of Opinion on Abortion and Gay Rights.” In Understanding Public Opinion, ed. Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 121–47.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Julia Riches. 2002. “Pills in the Public's Mind: RU-486 and the Framing of the Abortion Issue.” Women and Politics 24: 61–80.Google Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher, and Malcolm L. Goggin. 1993. “The Courts, Interest Groups, and Public Opinion About Abortion.” Political Behavior 15 (December): 381–405.Google Scholar