Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:56:28.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Are the underweight more ill than those of acceptable weight or overweight?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2009

Shona Kelly
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Jo Leonardi-Bee
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Jeanette Lilley
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

A recent paper has created considerable furore by concluding that those who are underweight or obese are at greater risk of mortality than those of acceptable weight or those who are overweight(Reference Flegel, Graubard, Williamson and Gail1). Critics of the paper have claimed that individuals in the underweight category may have underlying chronic disease, be smokers or that the overweight lead a healthy active lifestyle and carry more muscle mass(Reference Willett, Hu, Colditz and Manson2). A review of the literature on the ‘underweight’ has indicated a dearth of research on the characteristics of individuals in the underweight category, although a ‘J’-shaped relationship between BMI and many factors has been noted. This uncertainty makes it difficult to determine whether to include or exclude these individuals when estimating the health and mortality impacts of BMI.

Data on 13 343 community-living residents from the 2003 version of the Health Survey for England(3) were used. BMI was categorized using the WHO recommendations(4). Logistic regression models were constructed to compare demographic information, biochemical and anthropometric measurements in the underweight (<18.5 kg/m2) with those classified as acceptable weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) or overweight (25.0–29.9 kg/m2).

Univariate analyses showed that compared with the other BMI categories, the underweight were more likely to be young, smokers, abstainers from alcohol and inactive (all P<0.001). They were also more likely to be in social class IV or V, to live in the most deprived areas and less likely to be ethnically white (all P<0.001). ‘J’- or ‘U’-shaped relationships were found between BMI and activities of daily living, respiratory disease, physical activity and mental health variables. In multivariate analysis the fewest significant differences were between the underweight and those of acceptable weight (see Table).

Table. Final model ‘underweight’ v. ‘acceptable’ weight or ‘overweight’ participants

n/a, Not applicable; Ref, reference.

Few significant differences were found between the underweight and acceptable-weight groups. No evidence of high levels of physical disease or physical activity was found in the underweight. It could not be concluded that the underweight are less healthy than the other two BMI categories and, therefore, it cannot be recommended that the underweight should be excluded from analyses that examine the effects of obesity on mortality.

References

1. Flegel, KM, Graubard, BI, Williamson, DF & Gail, MH (2005) JAMA 293, 18611867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Willett, WC, Hu, FB, Colditz, GA & Manson, JE (2005) JAMA 294, 551553.Google Scholar
3. Department of Health (2003) Health Survey for England, 2003. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
4. World Health Organization (1988) Measuring Obesity – Classification and Description of Anthropometric Data. Report no. EUR/ICP/NUT 125-0612v. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table. Final model ‘underweight’ v. ‘acceptable’ weight or ‘overweight’ participants