Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:23:25.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synaptic plasticity is complex; neurobiologists are not

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

Richard M. Vickery
Affiliation:
School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australiarichard.vickery@unsw.edu.au www.med.unsw.edu.au/Physiology/school/staff/vickery/welcome.html

Abstract

The complexity of modern neurobiology in even a comparatively restricted area such as use-dependent synaptic plasticity is underestimated by the authors. This leads them to reject a neurobiological model of learning as conceptually parasitic on the psychology of conditioning, on the basis of objections that are shown to be unsustainable. An argument is also advanced that neurobiologists hold an intermediate version of the neuron doctrine rather than a conflated one. In this version, neurobiologists believe that psychology will eventually be underpinned by neurobiology but are agnostic about the extent of upheaval that this will produce in psychology.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)