Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T20:36:57.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Raising the profile of the anterior thalamus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1999

John C. Dalrymple-Alford
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealandj.dalrymple-alford@psyc.canterbury.ac.nz{psyc002; amg55}@psych2.psyc.canterbury.ac.nz www.psyc.canterbury.ac.nz/staff/jda/jda.htm
Anna M. Gifkins
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealandj.dalrymple-alford@psyc.canterbury.ac.nz{psyc002; amg55}@psych2.psyc.canterbury.ac.nz www.psyc.canterbury.ac.nz/staff/jda/jda.htm
Michael A. Christie
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealandj.dalrymple-alford@psyc.canterbury.ac.nz{psyc002; amg55}@psych2.psyc.canterbury.ac.nz www.psyc.canterbury.ac.nz/staff/jda/jda.htm

Abstract

Three questions arising from Aggleton & Brown's target article are addressed. (1) Is there any benefit to considering the effects of partial lesions of the anterior thalamic nuclei (AT)? (2) Do the AT have a separate role in the proposed extended hippocampal system? (3) Should perirhinal cortex function be restricted to familiarity judgements?

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)