Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T15:27:04.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New features for old: Creation or derivation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

Cyril R. Latimer
Cyril R. Latimer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australiacyril@psych.usyd.edu.au www.psych.usyd.edu.au/staff/cyril
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Schyns, Goldstone & Thibaut oppose the notion of fixed feature analysis, suggesting the possibility of flexible feature creation in object recognition and categorisation. Such proposals cannot be assessed until clear definitions of the objects in question and their decompositions are formulated. Flexibility may come from the decompositions of objects rather than from feature creation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 31 - 32
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)