Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T21:47:26.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hypnosis and will

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2005

Irving Kirsch  and
Steven Jay Lynn
Irving Kirsch*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health and Social Work, University of Plymouth, PlymouthPL4 8AA, Devon, United Kingdomhttp://www.plymouth.ac.uk/pages/dynamic.asp?page=staffdetails&id=ikirsch
Steven Jay Lynn*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY13902-6000
*
ikirsch@plymouth.ac.uk
slynn@binghamton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Although we are sympathetic to his central thesis about the illusion of will, having previously advanced a similar proposal, Wegner's account of hypnosis is flawed. Hypnotic behavior derives from specific suggestions that are given, rather than from the induction, of trance, and it can be observed in 90% of the population. Thus, it is very pertinent to the illusion of will. However, Wegner exaggerates the loss of subjective will in hypnosis.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , October 2004 , pp. 667 - 668
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. The mistaken idea that social cognitive theories of hypnosis are based on faking may be related to Sarbin's (1950) use of social psychological role theory to explain hypnotic behavior. It is important to note, however, that Sarbin referred to “role-taking” rather than “role-playing” to describe the determinants of hypnotic behavior and experience. People engage in multiple social roles (e.g., researcher, writer, teacher, parent, and spouse), and their behavior is altered as a function of which role they are in. These role-induced alterations in behavior occur automatically (i.e., without volitional planning) and are accompanied by corresponding alterations in experience. Thus, the effect of taking on a social role is not an indication that the person is faking. Wegner has taken on the role of a writer and we are in the role of reviewers, but we are not faking and we presume that Wegner is not faking either.