Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T16:52:18.931Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Designing studies to investigate the relationships between genes, environments, and developmental language disorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2005

HELEN TAGER–FLUSBERG
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine

Abstract

This paper focuses on designing studies that will compare children with developmental language disorders (DLD) drawn from several syndromes in which there are primary impairments in the acquisition of language. This kind of research can be used to address four key questions: (a) What are the developing language phenotypes that characterize specific disorders? (b) What factors are key precursors and predictors of language acquisition in DLD? (c) What are the genes that contribute to DLD in different syndromes? (d) What environmental factors influence the trajectories of language development in DLD? Several design issues are discussed including an overall study design, subject selection and recruitment, matching and comparisons across groups, and methodologies. A number of important challenges to the design and implementation of these kinds of studies are presented in the final section of the paper.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbeduto L., & Hagerman R. 1997. Language and communication in fragile X syndrome. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3, 313322.Google Scholar
Bates E. 2004. Explaining and interpreting deficits in language development across clinical groups: Where do we go from here? Brain and Language, 88, 248253.Google Scholar
Bauer D., Goldfield B., & Reznick S. 2002. Alternative approaches to analyzing individual differences in the rate of early vocabulary development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 313336.Google Scholar
Benasich A., & Tallal P. 2002. Infant discrimination of rapid auditory cues predicts later language impairment. Behavioral and Brain Research, 136, 3149.Google Scholar
Bishop D. V. M. 2000. Pragmatic language impairment: A correlate of SLI, a distinct subgroup, or part of the autistic continuum? In D. V. M. Bishop & L. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 99113). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Chapman R., & Hesketh L. 2001. Language, cognition, and short-term memory in individuals with Down syndrome. Down Syndrome: Research and Practice, 7, 17.Google Scholar
Dollaghan C. A., Campbell T., Paradise J., Feldman H., Janosky J., Pitcairn D., & Kurs–Lasky M. 1999. Maternal education and measures of early speech and language. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 14321443.Google Scholar
Fisher S. E. 2005. Dissection of molecular mechanisms underlying speech and language disorders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 111128.Google Scholar
Gleason J. B. 2000. The development of language (5th ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Gleason J. B., & Ely R. 2002. Gender differences in language development. In A. de Lisi–McGillicuddy & R. de Lisi (Eds.), Biology, society, and behavior: The development of sex differences in cognition (pp. 127154). Westport, CT: Ablex.
Hart B., & Risley T. 1995. Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
Hoff–Ginsberg E. 2000. Language development. New York: Wadsworth.
Jarrold C., & Baddeley A. 2001. Short-term memory in Down syndrome: Applying the working memory model. Down Syndrome: Research and Practice, 7, 1723.Google Scholar
Jin P., Zarnescu D., Ceman S., Nakamoto M., Mowrey J., Jongens T., Nelson D., Moses K., & Warren S. 2004. Biochemical and genetic interaction between the fragile X mental retardation protein and the microRNA pathway. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 113117.Google Scholar
Leonard L. 1998. Children with specific language impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Leonard L. 2000. Specific language impairment across languages. In D. V. M. Bishop & L. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 115129). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Lord C., & Paul R. 1997. Language and communication in autism. In D. J. Cohen & F. R. Volkmar (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive development disorders (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
Lord C., Risi S., Lambrecht L., Cook E. H., Lenventhal B. L., DiLavore P. S., Pickles A., & Rutter M. 2000. The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule—Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 205223.Google Scholar
Lord C., Rutter M., & LeCouteur A. 1994. Autism Diagnostic Interview—Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 659685.Google Scholar
Massey A. 1996. Cultural influences on language: Implications for assessing African American children. In A. Kamhi & K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication development and disorders in African American children: Research, assessment, and intervention (pp. 285306). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
McCardle P., Cooper J., & Freund L. 2005. Language and genetics: Needs and opportunities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 129135.Google Scholar
Mervis C. 2004. Cross-etiology comparisons of cognitive and language development. In M. L. Rice & S. Warren (Eds.), Development language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies (pp. 153185). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mervis C., & Klein–Tasman B. 2004. Methodological issues in group matching designs: Alpha levels for control variable comparisons and measurement characteristics of control and target variables. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 717.Google Scholar
Mervis C., & Robinson B. 1999. Methodological issues in cross-syndrome comparisons: Matching procedures, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64 (Serial No. 256), 115130.Google Scholar
Mervis C. B., & Robinson B. F. 2005. Designing measures for profiling and genotype/phenotype studies of individuals with genetic syndromes or developmental language disorders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 4164.Google Scholar
Müller R.-A. 2005. Neurocognitive studies of language impairments: The bottom-up approach. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 6578.Google Scholar
Ninio A., & Snow C. 1996. Pragmatic development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Phillips C. 2005. Electrophysiology in the study of developmental language impairments: Prospects and challenges for a top-down approach. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 7996.Google Scholar
Piven J. 1999. Genetic liability for autism: The behavioral expression in relatives. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 299308.Google Scholar
Plomin R., & Dale P. 2000. Genetics and early language development: A UK study of twins. In D. V. M. Bishop & L. Leonard (Eds.), Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome (pp. 3552). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Rice M. 2003, November. Language growth of children with SLI and unaffected children: Timing mechanisms and linguistic distinctions. Keynote address presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.
Rice M. 2004. Growth models of developmental language disorders. In M. L. Rice & S. Warren (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rice M., Tomblin J. B., Hoffman L., Richman W. A., & Marquis J. (in press). Grammatical tense deficits in children with SLI and nonspecific language impairment: Relationships with nonverbal IQ over time. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
Rice M. L. 1999. Specific grammatical limitations in children with specific language impairment. In H. Tager–Flusberg (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders (pp. 331359). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Spinath F., Price T., Dale P., & Plomin R. 2004. The genetic and environmental origins of language disability and ability. Child Development, 75, 445454.Google Scholar
Tager–Flusberg H. 2000. Language and understanding minds: Connections in autism. In S. Baron–Cohen, H. Tager–Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 124149). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tager–Flusberg H. 2004. Do autism and specific language impairment represent overlapping language disorders? In M. L. Rice & S. Warren (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tager–Flusberg H., & Cooper J. 1999. Present and future possibilities for defining a phenotype for specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42, 12751278.Google Scholar
Thorpe K., Rutter M., & Greenwood R. 2003. Twins as a natural experiment to study the causes of mild language delay. II: Family interaction risk factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 342355.Google Scholar
Tomasello M., & Bates E. 2001. Language development: The essential readings. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Warren S. 2004. Intervention as experiment. In M. L. Rice & S. Warren (Eds.), Developmental language disorders: From phenotypes to etiologies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zwaigenbaum L. 2004, March. Behavioral markers of autism in the first year of life. Paper presented at the Workshop on Current Directions in Autism Research, Jerusalem, Israel.