Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:14:08.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

When the State is Untrustworthy: Public Finance and Private Banking in Porfirian Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2005

NOEL MAURER
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in the Business, Government, and the International Economy (BGIE) unit at the Harvard Business School, Soldiers Field, Boston, MA 02163. E-mail: nmaurer@hbs.edu.
ANDREI GOMBERG
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), Camino a Santa Teresa 930, 10700 México, DF, MEXICO. E-mail: gomberg@itam.mx.

Abstract

All sovereign governments face a commitment problem: how can they promise to honor their own agreements? The standard solutions involve reputation or political institutions capable of tying the government's hands. Mexico's government in the 1880s used neither solution. It compensated its creditors by enabling them to extract rents from the rest of the economy. These rents came through special privileges over banking services and the right to administer federal taxes. Returns were extremely high: as long as the government refrained from confiscating all their assets (let alone repaying their debts) less than twice a decade, they would break even.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
© 2004 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Archivo Histórico del Banco Nacional de México (AHBNM). México, DF.
Bordo Michael. 1998. “What If Alexander Hamilton Had Been Argentinean? A Comparison of the Early Monetary Experiences of Argentina and the United States.NBER Working Paper No. w6862, Cambridge, MA, December
Bulow, Jeremy, and Kenneth Rogoff. 1989: “A Constant Recontracting Model of Sovereign Debt.Journal of Political Economy 97, no. 1 15578.Google Scholar
Carmagnani Marcello. 1989: “El liberalismo, los impuesto internos y el estado federal mexicano, 1857–1911.Historia Mexicana 38, no. 3 47196.Google Scholar
Carmagnani Marcello. 1994. Estado y mercado: La economía pública del liberalismo mexicano, 1850–1911. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica,
Castillo, Juan, ed. 1903. Colección de leyes, decretos, reglamentos, contratos, supremas resoluciones y noticias referentes al crédito público y correspondientes a los años de 1883 a 1903, época del arreglo definitivo de la deuda nacional. México, DF:
Coatsworth John. 1981. Growth Against Development: The Economic Impact of Railroads in Porfirian Mexico. Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University Press,
Coatsworth John. 1978Obstacles to Economic Growth in Nineteenth Century Mexico.American Historical Review 83, no. 1 80100Google Scholar
DeLong, Bradford, and Andrei Shleifer. 1993Princes and Merchants: European City Growth before the Industrial Revolution.Journal of Law and Economics 36, no. 2 671702Google Scholar
Eaton, Jonathan, Mark Gersovitz, and Joseph Stiglitz.The Pure Theory of Country Risk,European Economic Review 30, no. 3: 481513.
Economista Mexicano [México, DF], various dates. Hermeroteca Nacional, México, DF.
Fernández, Susan. 2002. Encumbered Cuba: Capital Markets and Revolt, 1878–1895. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press,
Johnson Noel. 2003. “Banking on the King: The Evolution of the Royal Revenue Farms in Old Regime France”. Mimeo, Washington University at Saint Louis, Saint Louis, MO,
Haber, Stephen, 1991: “Industrial Concentration and the Capital Markets,This JOURNAL 51, no. 3 55980.Google Scholar
Haber, Stephen, Armando Razo, and Noel Maurer. 2003. The Politics of Property Rights: Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico, 1876–1929. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,
Labastida Luis. 1889. Estudio histórico y filosófico sobre la legislación de los bancos. México, DF:
Ludlow Leonor. 1985. “La construcción de un banco: el Banco Nacional de México (1881–1884).” In Banca y poder en México (1800–1925), edited by Leonor Ludlow and Carlos Marichal, 299346. México, DF: Grijalbo,
Ludlow Leonor. 1990El Banco Nacional Mexicano y el Banco Mercantil Mexicano: radiografía social de sus primeros accionistas, 1881–1882.Historia Mexicana 39, no. 4 9791028Google Scholar
Marichal, Carlos, coordinator. 1996. Cuadros de Información Hacendaria, 1825–1970. Mimeo, Colegio de México, México, DF,
Marichal Carlos. 1995. “Foreign Loans, Banks and Capital Markets in Mexico, 1880–1910.” In La deuda pública en América Latina en perspectiva histórica, edited by Reinhard Liehr. Madrid: Vervuert/Iberoamericana,
Marichal Carlos. 1999. La bancarrota del virreinato: Nueva España y las finanzas del Imperio español, 1780–1810. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica,
Marichal Carlos. 2002. “Financial Market Reform and External Debt.” In The Mexican Economy, 1870–1930, edited by Jeffrey Bortz and Stephen Haber, 93119. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press,
Martínez Sobral, Enrique. 1911. Estudios elementales de legislación bancaria. México, DF:
Maurer Noel. 1999: “Banks and Entrepreneurs in Porfirian Mexico: Inside Exploitation or Sound Business Strategy?Journal of Latin American Studies 31, no. 2 33161Google Scholar
Maurer Noel. 2002. “The Internal Consequences of External Credibility: Banking Regulation and Banking Performance in Porfirian Mexico.” In The Mexican Economy, 1870–1930, edited by Jeffrey Bortz and Stephen Haber, 5092. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press,
Maurer, Noel, and Stephen Haber, 2002. “Institutional Change and Economic Growth: Banks, Financial Markets, and Mexican Industrialization, 1878–1913,” In The Mexican Economy, 1870–1930, edited by Jeffrey Bortz and Stephen Haber, 2349. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press,
Maurer, Noel, and Tridib Sharma. 2001: “Enforcing Property Rights Through Reputation: Groups in Mexico's Early Industrialization, 1878–1913,This Journal 61, no. 4 95073.Google Scholar
North, Douglass, and Barry Weingast. 1989: “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England.This Journal 49, no. 4 80332.Google Scholar
Olson Mancur. 1993Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development.American Political Science Review 87, no. 3 56776Google Scholar
Romero, Matías. 1879. Report of the Secretary of Finance of the United States of Mexico of the 15th of January 1879 on the actual condition of Mexico and the increase of commerce with the United States, rectifying the report of the Hon. John W. Foster, Minister Plenipotenciary in Mexico. New York, NY:
Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público. Memoria 1877–1878. México, DF.
Weingast Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Limited Government.” In The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics, edited by John Drobak and John Nye, 21346. San Diego, CA: Academic Press,
White Eugene. 2001. “France's Slow Transition from Privatized to Government-Administered Tax Collection: Tax Farming in the Eighteenth Century.Departmental Working Paper 2001–16, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ,