Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T07:41:10.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vehicle, process, and hybrid theories of consciousness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2004

Gerard O'Brien  and
Jonathan Opie
Gerard O'Brien*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, School of Humanities, University of Adelaide, South Australia5005, Australiahttp://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/humanities/gobrien/http://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/humanities/jopie/
Jonathan Opie*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, School of Humanities, University of Adelaide, South Australia5005, Australiahttp://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/humanities/gobrien/http://www.arts.adelaide.edu.au/humanities/jopie/
*
gerard.obrien@adelaide.edu.au
jon.opie@adelaide.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Martínez-Manrique contends that we overlook a possible nonconnectionist vehicle theory of consciousness. We argue that the position he develops is better understood as a hybrid vehicle/process theory. We assess this theory and in doing so clarify the commitments of both vehicle and process theories of consciousness.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 303 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Haugeland, J. (1991) Representational genera. In: Philosophy and connectionist theory, ed. Ramsey, W., Stich, S. P. & Rumelhart, D. E.. Erlbaum. [FM-M]Google Scholar
Kirsh, D. (1990) When is information explicitly represented? In: Information, language and cognition, ed. Hanson, P.. University of British Columbia Press. [FM-M, rGO]Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. (1991) Leaping to conclusions: Connectionism, consciousness, and the computational mind. In: Connectionism and the philosophy of mind, ed. Horgan, T. & Tienson, J.. Kluwer. [rGO]Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. (1995) Consciousness: A connectionist manifesto. Minds and Machines 5:161-85. [rGO]Google Scholar
Lloyd, D. (1996) Consciousness, connectionism, and cognitive neuroscience: A meeting of the minds. Philosophical Psychology 9:61-79. [rGO]Google Scholar
Martínez, F. & Ezquerro, J. (1998) Explicitness with psychological ground. Minds and Machines 8:353-74. [FM-M]Google Scholar
O’Brien, G. & Opie, J. (1999) A connectionist theory of phenomenal experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1):127-96. [FM-M, rGO]Google Scholar
O’Brien, G. & Opie, J. (1999r) Putting content into a vehicle theory of consciousness. (Author's Response to Open Peer Commentary.) Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1):175-96. [rGO]Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L. & Hinton, G. E. (1986) Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Vol. 2: Psychological and Biological Models, ed. McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, E. E.. MIT Press. [rGO]Google Scholar
Smolensky, P. (1988) On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:1-23. [rGO]Google Scholar