Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T04:20:15.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Strong modularity and circular reasoning pervade the planning–control model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Verónica C. Ramenzoni  and
Michael A. Riley
Verónica C. Ramenzoni*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221-0376www.oz.uc.edu/~rileym/pmdl/RileyLab
Michael A. Riley*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH45221-0376www.oz.uc.edu/~rileym/pmdl/RileyLab
*
ramenzvc@email.uc.edu
michael.riley@uc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We believe the dichotomy of processes introduced in the target article is highly speculative, because the dichotomy is shaped by the questionable assumption of modularity and the complementary assumption of locality. As a result, the author falls into a line of circular reasoning that biases his analysis of the experimental and neuropsychological data, and weakens the proposed model.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 48 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)