Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T17:03:46.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analogy is priming, but relations are not transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Fintan J. Costello
Fintan J. Costello
Affiliation:
School of Computer Science and Informatics, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland. fintan.costello@ucd.iehttp://www.cs.ucd.ie/Staff/AcademicStaff/fcostello/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Leech et al. make two proposals: that relational priming is central to analogy, and that relations between objects are best represented as transformations of those objects. Although their account of analogy as relational priming is a useful contribution to our understanding of analogical development, in this commentary I show that relations in general cannot be represented by transformations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 382 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Goswami, U. & Brown, A. L. (1989) Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition 35:69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U., Leevers, H., Pressley, S. & Wheelwright, S. (1998) Causal reasoning about pairs of relations and analogical reasoning in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 16:553–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar