Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:50:45.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does metacognition necessarily involve metarepresentation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2004

Joëlle Proust*
Affiliation:
Institut Jean-Nicod CNRS (Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Ecole Normale Supérieure), 75007Paris, France; and Max-Planck Institut Für Psychologische Forschung, Münich, Germanyhttp://joelle.proust.free.fr

Abstract:

Against the view that metacognition is a capacity that parallels theory of mind, it is argued that metacognition need involve neither metarepresentation nor semantic forms of reflexivity, but only process-reflexivity, through which a task-specific system monitors its own internal feedback by using quantitative cues. Metacognitive activities, however, may be redescribed in metarepresentational, mentalistic terms in species endowed with a theory of mind.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)