Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:28:43.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Collision of Noble Goals: Protecting Human Subjects, Improving Health Care, and a Research Agenda for Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2008

Sue Tolleson-Rinehart
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Extract

Atul Gawande is a surgeon who began creating vivid word paintings of the performance of the American health care system in The New Yorker's pages while he was still a resident. Those of us who are immersed in, and charged with measuring, that system—as I have been for the last decade—find his “Annals of Medicine” column's evocations of heroic system successes and frightening system failures true to the processes we more prosaically try to analyze and evaluate. In December 2007 Gawande published a New Yorker essay called “The Checklist,” followed just days later by an op-ed piece in the New York Times (Gawande 2007a; 2007b).

Type
Symposium—Protecting Human Research Participants, IRBs, and Political Science Redux
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAHRPP. 2008. Accreditation Standards. http://www.aahrpp.org/www.aspx?PageID=24 (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Aspden, Philip, Corrigan, Janet, Wolcott, Julie, and Erickson, Shari M., eds. 2004. Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care. Washington D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Berwick, Donald M. 1989. “Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Health Care.” New England Journal of Medicine 320 (1): 53–6.Google Scholar
Chassin, Mark R., Galvin, Robert W., and Quality, the National Rountable on Health Care. 1998. “The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care.” Journal of the American Medical Association 280 (11): 1,000–5.Google Scholar
Clancy, Carolyn M., and Eisenberg, John M.. 1998. “Outcomes Research: Measuring the End Results of Health Care.” Science 282 (October): 245–6.Google Scholar
Davidoff, F., and Batalden, P.. 2005. “Toward Stronger Evidence on Quality Improvement. Draft Publication Guidelines: The Beginning of a Consensus Project.” Quality and Safety in Health Care 14 (5): 319–25.Google Scholar
Davis, F. Daniel. 2008. “Human Dignity and Respect for Persons: A Historical Perspective on Public Bioethics.” In Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. U.S. Independent Agencies and Commissions, chapter 2. http://www.bioethics.gov/reports/human_dignity/chapter2.html (May 5, 2008).Google Scholar
Doezema, David, and Hauswald, Mark. 2002. “Quality Improvement or Research: A Distinction Without a Difference?IRB: Ethics and Human Subjects Research 24 (4): 912.Google Scholar
Gawande, Atul. 2007a. “Annals of Medicine: The Checklist.” The New Yorker, December 10. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/12/10/071210fa_fact_gawande (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Gawande, Atul. 2007b. “A Livesaving Checklist.” The New York Times, December 30. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/30/opinion/30gawande.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Gawande&st=nyt&oref=slogin (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
HHS. 2005a. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46): Subpart A (Common Rule). Code of Federal Regulations. Office for Human Research Protections. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/45cfr46.html (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
HHS. 2005b. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46): Subpart A (Common Rule). Code of Federal Regulations. Office for Human Research Protections. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/documents/OHRPRegulations.pdf (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
HHS. 2008. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46): Subpart A (Common Rule). Code of Federal Regulations. Office for Human Research Protections. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/#common (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Lohr, Kathleen N., ed. 1990. Medicare: A Strategy for Quality Assurance. Vol 2. Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Lohr, Kathleen N., and Schroeder, Stephen A.. 1990. “A Strategy for Quality Assurance in Medicare.” New England Journal of Medicine 322 (10): 707–12.Google Scholar
McNeil, Barbara J. 2001. “Hidden Barriers to Improvement in the Quality of Care.” New England Journal of Medicine 345 (22): 1,612–20.Google Scholar
Miller, Franklin G., and Emanuel, Ezekiel J.. 2008. “Quality-Improvement Research and Informed Consent.” New England Journal of Medicine 358 (8): 765–7.Google Scholar
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical, and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
OHRP. 2008. “OHRP Concludes Case Regarding Johns Hopkins University Research on Hospital Infections; Encourages Continuance of Work to Reduce Incidence of Catheter-Related Infections; Offers New Guidance for Future Research.” Department of Health and Human Services, February 15. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/news/recentnews.html#20080215 (May 1, 2008).Google Scholar
Pearson, Steven D., Miller, Franklin G., and Emanuel, Ezekiel J.. 2006. “Medicare's Requirement for Research Participation as a Condition of Coverage: Is it ethical?JAMA 296 (8): 988–91.Google Scholar
Sieber, Joan E. 1989. “On Studying the Powerful (or Fearing to Do So): A Vital Role for IRBs.” IRB: Ethics and Human Research 11 (5): 16.Google Scholar
Wennberg, John E., Fisher, Elliott S., Goodman, David C., and Skinner, Jonathan S.. 2008. Tracking Patients with Severe Chronic Illness: The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 2008. New Hanover, NH: The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice.Google Scholar