Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:23:05.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shared circuits in language and communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2008

Simon Garrod  and
Martin J. Pickering
Simon Garrod
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom
Martin J. Pickering
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, United Kingdom. simon@psy.gla.ac.ukhttp://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~simon/martin.pickering@ed.ac.ukhttp://www.psy.ed.ac.uk/people/martinp/index_html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The target article says surprisingly little about the possible role of shared circuits in language and communication. This commentary considers how they might contribute to linguistic communication, particularly during dialogue. We argue that shared circuits are used to promote alignment between linguistic representations at many levels and to support production-based emulation of linguistic input during comprehension.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 26 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J. & Cleland, A. A. (2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 75:B13–B25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. & Bargh, J. (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fadiga, L., Craighero, L., Buccino, G. & Rizzolatti, G. (2002) Speech listening specifically modulates the excitability of tongue muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 15:399–402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S. & Anderson, A. (1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27:181–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrod, S. & Pickering, M. J. (2004) Why is conversation so easy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:8–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardo, J. S. (2006) On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119:2382–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:105–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkins, K., Strafella, A. P. & Paus, T. (2003) Seeing and hearing speech excites the motor system involved in speech production. Neuropsychologia 41:989–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed