Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-8mjnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T12:16:04.954Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tunicate feeding filters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2003

Q. Bone*
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, UK
C. Carré
Affiliation:
Observatoire Océanologique, LOBEPM–ESA 7076, BP28, 06234 Villefranche-sur-Mer, Cedex, France
P. Chang
Affiliation:
Observatoire Océanologique, LOBEPM–ESA 7076, BP28, 06234 Villefranche-sur-Mer, Cedex, France
*
Corresponding author: e-mail: q.bone@mba.ac.uk

Abstract

This review discusses the structure and operation of the fine mesh ‘mucous’ feeding filters of tunicates. The function of the endostyle in producing the feeding filter and the different ways in which the filter is deployed are also described.

The fine structure of the filter includes new data, and the ultrastructural dimensions of the filter mesh and filament thickness are tabulated for the different tunicate groups. Histochemical data suggest that a peptide core is surrounded by a mucopolysaccharide sheath, and endostyle gland cell histochemistry and ultrastructure indicates protein synthesis. The construction of the filter by the endostyle was first considered in ascidians, and has been updated by observations on the simpler endostyle in salps, where there is evidence that secretions of gland cells pass to the bases of a fence of cilia, there to fuse and pass off the ciliary tips as fine filaments composing the filter net. Although all filters that have been examined when deployed have a rectangular mesh, reasons are given for supposing that when formed in the endostyle they have a square mesh in which both longitudinal and transverse filaments are of similar thickness and that the transverse filaments are stretched as the filter is deployed, so becoming thinner.

Finally, some ecological consequences of the filter parameters in the different tunicate groups are considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acuila, J.-L., 1994. Summer vertical distribution of appendicularians in the central Cantabrian Sea (Bay of Biscay). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 74, 585–601.Google Scholar
Acufia, J.-L., 2001. Pelagic tunicates: why gelatinous? American Naturalist, 158, 100–107.Google Scholar
Acufia, J.-L., Deibel, D. & Morris, C.C., 1996. Particle capture mechanism of the pelagic tunicate Oikopleura vanhoeffeni. Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 1800–1814.Google Scholar
Alldredge, A., 1976. Discarded appendicularian houses as sources of food, surface habitats, and particulate organic matter in planktonic environments. Limnology and Oceanography, 21, 14–23.Google Scholar
Andersen, V., 1998. Salp and pyrosomid blooms and their importance in biogeochemical cycles. In The biology of pelagic tunicates (ed. Q. Bone), pp. 125–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armsworthy, S.L., MacDonald, B.A. & Ward, J.E., 2001. Feeding activity absorption efficiency and suspension feeding processes in the ascidian Halocynthia pyriformis (Stolidobranchia: Ascidiacea); responses to variations in diet quantity and quality. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 260, 41–69.Google Scholar
Barrington, E.J.W., 1957. The distribution and significance of organically bound iodine in the endostyle of Ciona intestinalis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 36, 1–16.Google Scholar
Bedo, A.W., Acuna, J.-L., Robins, D. & Harris, R.P., 1993. Grazing in the micronic and sub-micronic particle size range: the case of Oikopleura dioica (Appendicularia). Bulletin of Marine Science, 53, 2–14.Google Scholar
Bone, Q., Braconnot, J.-C. & Carre, C., 1997. On the filter feeding of Doliolum (Tunicata: Thaliacea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 214, 179–193.Google Scholar
Bone, Q., Braconnot, J.-C. & Ryan, K.P., 1991. On the pharyngeal feeding filter of the salp Pegea confoederata (Tunicata: Thaliacea). Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), 72, 55–60.Google Scholar
Bone, Q., Carre, C. & Ryan, K.P., 2000. The endostyle and feeding filter in salps (Tunicata). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80, 523–534.Google Scholar
Briand, F., ed., 2002. Gelatinous plankton out breaks: theory and practice. CIESM Workshop Series, Monaco, 14, 1–112.Google Scholar
Caron, D.A., Madin, L.P. & Cole, J.J., 1989. Composition and degradation of salp fecal pellets: implications for vertical flux in oceanic environments. Journal of Marine Research, 47, 829–850.Google Scholar
Chisholm, S.W., 1992. Phytoplankton size. In Primary production and biogeochemical cycles in the sea (ed. P. Falkowski and A. Woodhead), pp. 213–237. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Deibel, D., 1985. Blooms of the pelagic tunicate, Dolioletta gegenbauri: are they associated with Gulf Stream frontal eddies? Journal of Marine Research, 43, 211–236.Google Scholar
Deibel, D., Dickson, M.L. & Powell, C.V.L., 1985. Ultrastructure of the mucous feeding filter of the house of the appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffem. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 27, 79–86.Google Scholar
Deibel, D. & Jefferson, J.T., 1985. Zooplankton feeding ecology: contents of fecal pellets of the appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffeni. Marine Biology Progress Series, 27, 67–78.Google Scholar
Deibel, D. & Lee, S.H., 1992. Retention efficiency of sub-micrometer particles by the pharyngeal filter of the pelagic tunicate Oikopleura vanhoeffeni. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 81, 25–30.Google Scholar
Deibel, D. & Powell, C.V.L., 1987. Ultrastructure of the pharyngeal filter of the appendicularian Oikopleura vanhoeffeni: implications for particle size selection and fluid mechanics. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 35, 243–250.Google Scholar
Fenaux, R., 1986. The house of Oikopleura dioica (Tunicata, Appendicularia): structure and functions. Zoomorphology, 106, 224–231.Google Scholar
Fenaux, R., 1998. Anatomy and functional anatomy of the Appendicularia. In The biology of pelagic tunicates (ed. Q. Bone), pp. 25–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fiala-Medioni, A., 1978. Filter-feeding ethology of benthic invertebrates (Ascidians). III. Recording of water current in situ-rate and rhythm of pumping. Marine Biology, 45, 185–190.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F., 1978. Filter characteristics of appendicularian food catching nets. Experientia, 34, 173–175.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F., 1981. On the ultrastructure of mucus. Biomedical Research, 2, 49–53.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F., 1991. Architecture of, and water circulation and flow rate in, the house of the planktonic tunicate Oikopleura labradoriensis. Marine Biology, 111, 95–111.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F. & Deibel, D., 1998. The appendicularian house. In The biology of pelagic tunicates (ed. Q. Bone), pp. 105–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F., Deibel, D., & Morris, C.C., 1990. Visualisation of the transparent gelatinous house of the pelagic tunicate Oikopleura vanhoeffeni using Sepia ink. Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory Woods Hole, 178, 118–125.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F., Deibel, D. & Morris, C.C., 1992. Filtration of colloidal melanin from sea water by planktonic tunicates. Nature, London, 355, 630–632.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F. & Fiala-Medioni, A., 1979. Filter characteristics of ascidian food trapping mucous films. Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), 60, 271–272.Google Scholar
Flood, P.F. & Fiala-Medioni, A., 1981. Ultrastructure and histochemistry of the food trapping mucous film in benthic filter feeders (Ascidians). Acta Zoologica (Stockholm), 62, 53–65.Google Scholar
Fol, H., 1876. Ueber der Schleimdrüse oder den Endostyl der Tunicaten. Morphologisches Jahrbuch, 1, 222–242.Google Scholar
Fortier, L., Le Fe'vre, J. & Legendre, L., 1994. Export of biogenic carbon to fish and to the deep ocean: the role of large planktonic macrophages. Journal of Plankton Research, 16, 809–839.Google Scholar
Fredriksson, G., Fenaux, R. & Ericson, L.E., 1989. Distribution of peroxidase and iodination activity in the endostyles of Oikopleura albicans and Oikopleura longicauda (Appendicularia, Chordata). Cell and Tissue Research, 255, 505–510.Google Scholar
Gibson, D.M. & Paffenhöfer, G.A., 2002. Asexual reproduction of the doliolid Dolioletta gegenbauri Uljanin (Tunicata: Thaliacea). Journal of Plankton Research, 24, 703–712.Google Scholar
Godeaux, J.E.A., 1989. Functions of the endostyle in the tunicates. Bulletin of Marine Science, 45, 228–242.Google Scholar
Gorsky, G. & Fenaux, R., 1998. The role of Appendicularia in marine food webs. In The biology of pelagic tunicates (ed. Q. Bone), pp. 25–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harbison, G.R., 1998. The parasites and predators of Thaliacea. In The biology of pelagic tunicates (ed. Q. Bone), pp. 187–214. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harbison, G.R. & McAlister, V.L., 1979. The filter feeding rates and particle retention efficiencies of three species of Cyclosalpa (Tunicata, Thaliacea). Limnology and Oceanography, 24, 875–892.Google Scholar
Harbison, G.R. & McAlister, V.L., 1980. Fact and artefact in copepod feeding experiments. Limnology and Oceanography, 25, 971–981.Google Scholar
Harbison, G.R. & Gilmer, R.W., 1976. The feeding rates of the pelagic tunicate Pegea confoederata and two other salps. Limnology and Oceanography, 21, 517–528.Google Scholar
Haskell, A.G.E., Hofmann, E.E., Paffenhöfer, G.-A. & Verity, P.G., 1999. Modeling the effects of doliolids on the plankton community structure of the southeastern U.S. continental shelf. Journal of Plankton Research, 21, 1725–1752.Google Scholar
Hopcroft, R.R. & Roff, J.C., 1995. Zooplankton growth rates: extraordinary production by the larvacean Oikopleura dioica in tropical waters. Journal of Plankton Research, 17, 205–220.Google Scholar
Huxley, T.H., 1851. Observations upon the anatomy and physiology of Salpa and Pyrosoma together with remarks on Doliolum and Appendicularia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 251, 567–605.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, C.B. & Goldberg, E.D., 1953. Particle filtration in some ascidians and Lamellibranchs. Biological Bulletin, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 105, 477–489.Google Scholar
Kremer, P. & Madin, L.P., 1992. Particle retention efficiency of salps. Journal of Plankton Research, 14, 1009–1015.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M., 1984. Feeding currents and particle capture mechanisms in suspension feeding animals. American Zoologist, 24, 71–84.Google Scholar
Li, W.K.W., 2002. Macroecological patterns of phytoplankton in the northwestern North Atlantic Ocean. Nature, London, 419, 154–156.Google Scholar
Loudon, C., 1990. Empirical test of filtering theory: particle capture by rectangular mesh nets. Limnology and Oceanography, 35, 143–148.Google Scholar
Loudon, C. & Alstad, D.N., 1990. Theoretical mechanics of particle capture: Predictions for hydropsychid caddisfly distributional ecology. American Naturalist, 135, 360–381.Google Scholar
Madin, L.P., 1974. Field observations on the feeding behaviour of salps (Tunicata: Thaliacea). Marine Biology, 25, 143–147.Google Scholar
Madin, L.P., 1982. Production, composition and sedimentation of salp fecal pellets in oceanic waters. Marine Biology, 67, 39–45.Google Scholar
Madin, L.R. & Deibel, D., 1998. Feeding and energetics of Thaliacea. In The biology of pelagic tunicates (ed. Q. Bone), pp. 81–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madin, L.R. & Purcell, J.E., 1992. Feeding metabolism and growth of Cyclosalpa bakeri in the subarctic Pacific. Limnology and Oceanography, 37, 1236–1251.Google Scholar
Matsueda, H., Handa, N., Inoue, I. & Takano, H., 1986. Ecological significance of salp fecal pellets collected by sediment traps in the eastern North Pacific. Marine Biology, 91, 421–431.Google Scholar
Monniot, C. & Monniot, F., 1991. Dicouverte d'une nouvelle lignee evolutive chez les ascidies de grande profondeur: une Ascidiidae carnivore. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences Paris, Series III, 312, 383–388.Google Scholar
Monniot, F., 1979. Microfiltres et ciliatures branchiales des ascidies littorales en microscopie electronique. Bulletin du Museum Nationale d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 4me Serie, 1, 843–859.Google Scholar
Olsson, R., 1963. Endostyles and endostylar secretions: a comparative histochemical study. Acta Zoologica, 44, 299–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J.K. & Riisgärd, H.U., 1992. Filtration capacity of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis and its grazing impact in a shallow fjord. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 88, 9–17.Google Scholar
Randlov, A. & Riisgärd, H.U., 1979. Efficiency of particle reten-tion and filtration rate in four species of ascidians. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 1, 55–59.Google Scholar
Robards, A.W. & Sleytr, U.B., 1985. Low temperature methods in biological electron microscopy. In Practical methods in electron microscopy, vol. 10 (ed. A. Glauert), pp. 1–551. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, D.I. & Koehl, M.A.R., 1977. The mechanisms of filter feeding: some theoretical considerations. American Naturalist, 111, 981–994.Google Scholar
Savigny, J.-C., 1816. Recherches anatomiques sur les Ascidies coniposees et sur les Ascidies simples. Syste'me de la classe des Ascidies. Me'moires sur les Animaux sans Verte'bres, Paris, 2, fasc.1., 1–240.Google Scholar
Shu, D.-G., Chen, L., Han, J. & Zhang, X.-L., 2001. An early Cambrian tunicate from China. Nature, London, 411, 472–473.Google Scholar
Silver, M.W. & Bruland, K.W., 1981. Differential feeding and fecal pellet composition of salps and pteropods, and the possible origin of the deep-sea flora and olive green ‘cells’. Marine Biology, 62, 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, M.W. & Gowing, M.M., 1991. The ‘particle’ flux: origins and biological components. Progress in Oceanography, 26, 75–113.Google Scholar
Silvester, N.R., 1983. Some hydrodynamic aspects of filter feeding with rectangular mesh nets. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 103, 265–286.Google Scholar
Sommer, U. & Stibor, H., 2002. Copepoda—Cladocera— Tunicata: the role of three major mesozooplankton groups in pelagic food webs. Ecological Research, 17, 161–174.Google Scholar
Stach, T. & Turberville, J.M., 2002. Phylogeny of Tunicata inferred from molecular and morphological characters. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 25, 408–428.Google Scholar
Swalla, B.J., Cameron, C.B., Corley L.S. & Garey J.R., 2000. Urochordates are monophyletic within the deuterostomes. Systematic Biology, 49, 52–64.Google Scholar
Tebeau, C.M. & Madin, L.P., 1994. Grazing rates for three life history stages of the doliolid Dolioletta gegenbauri Uljanin (Tunicata, Thaliacea). Journal of Plankton Research, 16, 1075–1081.Google Scholar
Wada, H., 1998. Evolutionary history of free-swimming and sessile lifestyles in urochordates as deduced from 18s rDNA molecular phylogeny. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 15, 1189–1194.Google Scholar
Wallengren, H., 1905. Zur Biologie der Muscheln. I. Die Wasserströmungen. Acta Universitatis Landwirts, N.S., 1, 1–64.Google Scholar
Werner, B., 1959. Das Prinzip des endlosen Schleimfilters beim Nahrungserwerb wirbelloser Meerestiere. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie, 44, 181–216.Google Scholar
Zeldis, J.R., Davis, C.S., James, M.R., Ballara, S.L., Booth, W.E. & Chang, F.H., 1995. Salp grazing: effects on phytoplankton abundance, vertical distribution and taxonomic composition in a coastal habitat. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 126, 267–283.Google Scholar