Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:21:45.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observational learning, group selection, and societal evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2008

ULRICH WITT
ULRICH WITT*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Unit, Germany
*
*Correspondence to: Max Planck Institute of Economics, Evolutionary Economics Group, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745 Jena, Germany. Email: Ulrich.Witt@econ.mpg.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The core problem of any group selection hypothesis is the possibility that pro-social individual behavior contributing to a selection advantage for the group as a whole is potentially subject to free-riding. If group behavior and, hence, the conditions for group selection change through imitation and migration between groups, as argued in Hayek's theory of societal evolution, the explanation of group selection needs to account for the individuals' cognitively reflected motivation to adopt pro-social behavior in the face of free-riding. To do so a game-theoretic model is suggested that incorporates observational learning as a mechanism of acquiring, and choosing between, strategies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , April 2008 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. (2001), ‘The Colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation’, American Economics Review, 91: 1369–1401.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2000), Cognitive Psychology and its Implications, 5th edn, New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action – A Social Cognitive Theory, Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bianchi, M. (1994), ‘Hayek's spontaneous order: the “correct” vs. the “corrigible” society’, in Birner, J. and van Zijp, R. (eds), Hayek, Co-ordination and Evolution, London: Routledge, pp. 232–251.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. (1985), Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, R. and Orléan, A. (1993), ‘How do conventions evolve?’, in Witt, U. (ed.), Evolution in Markets and Institutions, Wuerzburg: Physica, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B. (2000), ‘The emergence of Hayek's ideas on cultural evolution’, Review of Austrian Economics, 13: 5–22.Google Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A. M. (1922), The Population Problem: A Study in Human Evolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Congleton, R. D. and Vanberg, V. (2001), ‘Help, harm or avoid? On the personal advantage of dispositions to cooperate and punish in multilateral PD games with exit’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44: 145–167.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1997), Guns, Germs, and Steel – The Fates of Human Societies, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Eshel, I., Sansone, E., and Shaked, A. (1999), ‘The emergence of kinship behavior in strucutred populations of unrelated individuals’, International Journal of Game Theory, 28: 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2001), Altruistically Inclined? The Behavioral Sciences, Evolutionary Theory, and the Origins of Reciprocity, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Galor, O. and Moav, O. (2002), ‘Natural selection and the origin of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 1133–1191.Google Scholar
Gray, J. (1984), Hayek on Liberty, New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. (1964), ‘The genetical evolution of social behavior I’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7: 1–16.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1948), ‘Individualism: true and false’, in Hayek, F. A., Individualism and Economic Order, London: Routledge & Sons, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1967a), ‘Notes on the evolution of systems of rules of conduct’, in Hayek, F. A., Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, London: Routledge & Keagan Paul, pp. 66–81.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1967b), ‘Rules, perception and intelligibility’, in Hayek, F. A., Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, London: Routledge & Keagan Paul, pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1967c), ‘Dr. Bernhard Mandeville’, Proceedings of the British Academy, Vol. 12, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1971), ‘Nature vs. nurture once again’, Encounter, 36: 81–83.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1979), Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 3, The Political Order of a Free People, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1988), The Fatal Conceit, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004), ‘Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53: 3–35.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. and Boyd, R. (1998), ‘The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 19: 215–242.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G.M. (1991), ‘Hayek's theory of cultural evolution: an evaluation in the light of Vanberg's critique’, Economics and Philosophy, 7: 67–82.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1982), Evolution and the Theory of Games, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Menger, C. (1963), Problems of Economics and Sociology, Urbana: University of Illinois Press 1963 (first published in German 1883).Google Scholar
Rizzello, S. (2000), ‘Economic change, subjective perception and institutional evolution’, Metroeconomica, 51: 127–150.Google Scholar
Sober, E. and Wilson, D.S. (1998), Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. (1986), ‘Spontaneous market order and social rules: a critical examination of F. A.von Hayek's theory of cultural evolution’, Economics and Philosophy, 2: 75–100.Google Scholar
Vanberg, V. (1997), ‘Institutional evolution through purposeful selection: the constitutional economics of John R. Commons’, Constitutional Political Economy, 8: 105–122.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1899), The Theory of the Leisure Class – An Economic Study of Institutions, New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. (1914), The Instinct of Worksmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts, New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Witt, U. (1994), ‘The theory of societal evolution – Hayek's unfinished legacy’, in Birner, J. and Van Zijp, R. (eds), Hayek, Coordination and Evolution, London: Routledge, pp. 178–189.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V.C. (1962), Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behavior, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Young, H. P. (1993), ‘The Evolution of Conventions’, Econometrica, 61: 57–84.Google Scholar