Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:38:08.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time and Change: A Review of the Qualitative Longitudinal Research Literature for Social Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2007

Anne Corden  and
Jane Millar
Anne Corden
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow, Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York E-mail: pac2@york.ac.uk
Jane Millar
Affiliation:
Professor of Social Policy, Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy, University of Bath, Bath E-mail: j.i.millar@bath.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The four earlier articles in this themed section are based on presentations at a workshop convened to explore challenges in using qualitative longitudinal methods for policy-related research, with particular focus on data analysis and interpretation. Together, they provide useful pointers to the scope of qualitative longitudinal approaches, and extensive discussion of management and analysis of the particular and complex data produced. Readers who are interested in pursuing themselves a qualitative longitudinal approach to policy-related social research will want also to look to a wider literature to enhance their understanding of issues to be taken into consideration, and to explore the range of methods and options. The aim of this review article is to provide some ideas about the kind of literature likely to prove helpful. The bibliographic references for this review article are supplemented by the guide to sources which completes this themed section.

Type
Qualitative Longitudinal Research for Social Policy
Information
Social Policy and Society , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 583 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, B. (2000), ‘The temporal gaze: the challenge for social theory in context of GM food’, British Journal of Sociology, 51, 1, 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, P. (2004), ‘The influence of dynamic perspectives on poverty analysis and anti-poverty policy in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 3, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M., Bechhofer, F., McCrone, D., Jamieson, L., Li, Y. and Stewart, R. (2005), ‘Timespans and plans among young adults’, Sociology, 39, 1, 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H., Hudson, M., Parry, J., Sahin-Dikmen, M., Taylor, R. and Wilkinson, D. (2005), Ethnic Minority Outreach: An Evaluation, DWP Research Report No. 229, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Becker, S. and Bryman, A.(eds) (2004), Understanding Research for Social Policy and Practice, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Brannen, J. and Neilson, A. (2007), ‘Young people, time horizons and planning: a response to Anderson et al., Sociology (2007), 41, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brannen, J. (2002), Life and Time: A Sociological Journey, London: Institute of Education, Professorial Lecture.Google Scholar
Bryman, A. (2004), Social Research Methods, second edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crow, G., Wiles, R., Heath, S. and Charles, V. (2006), ‘Research ethics and data quality: the implications of informed consent’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 2, 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewilde, C. (2003), ‘A life course perspective on social exclusion and poverty’, British Journal of Sociology, 54, 1, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrall, S. (2006), ‘What is qualitative longitudinal research?’, LSE Methodology Institute, Papers in Social Research Methods, Qualitative Series, Paper 11, available at: www.lse.ac.uk/collections/methodologyInstitute/.Google Scholar
France, A., Bendelow, G. and Williams, S. (2000), ‘A “risky” business: researching the health beliefs of children and young people’, in Lewis, A. and Lindsay, G. (eds), Researching Children's Perspectives, Buckingham: Open University Press, pp. 151–162.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Tennant, R., Huxley, M. and O'Connor, W. (2005), The Role of Work in Low-income Families with Children – A Longitudinal Qualitative Study, Department of Work and Pensions Research Report No. 245, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Grewal, I. and Lewis, J. (2006), ‘Ethics in social research: the views of research participants’, prepared for the Government Social Research Unit by National Centre for Social Research: London.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. (1992), ‘Deconstructing the qualitative–quantitative divide’, in Hammersley, M. (ed.), What's Wrong with Ethnography?, London: Routledge, pp. 159–173.Google Scholar
Heinz, W.R. and Kruger, H. (2001), ‘Life course: innovations and challenges for social research’, Current Sociology, 49, 2, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoggart, L., Campbell-Barr, V., Ray, K. and Vegeris, S. (2006), Staying in Work and Moving Up: Evidence from the UK Employment Retention and Advancement Demonstration Project, DWP Research Report No. 381, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.Google Scholar
Holland, J., Thomson, R. and Henderson, S. (2006), Qualitative Longitudinal Research: A Discussion Paper, Families and Social Capital ESRC Research Group, London: South Bank University, www.lsbu.ac.uk/families/workingpapers/familieswp21.pdf.Google Scholar
Leisering, L. and Walker, R. (1998), ‘New realities: the dynamics of modernity’, in Leisering, L. and Walker, R. (eds), The Dynamics of Modern Society, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
MacDonald, R., Shildrick, T., Webster, C. and Simpson, D. (2005), Growing up in poor neighbourhoods: the significance of class and place in the extended transitions of “socially excluded” young adults’, Sociology, 39, 5, 873–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKie, L., Gregory, S. and Bowlby, S. (2002), ‘Shadow times: the temporal and spatial experiences of caring and working’, Sociology, 36, 4, 897–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millar, J. (2006), ‘Better-off in work? Work, security and welfare for lone mothers’, in Glendinning, C. and Kemp, P.A. (eds), Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 171–186.Google Scholar
Molloy, D. and Woodfield, K. with Bacon, J. (2002) Longitudinal Qualitative Research Approaches in Evaluation Studies, Department for Work and Pensions Working Paper No. 7, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A.M. (1995), ‘Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice’, in Huber, G.P. and Van de Ven, A. H.. (eds), Longitudinal Field Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 91–125.Google Scholar
Ridge, T. (2006), ‘Helping out at home: children's contributions to sustaining work and care in lone-mother families’, in Glendinning, C. and Kemp, P.A. (eds), Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State, Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 203–218.Google Scholar
Ridge, T. (2007), ‘It's a family affair: low-income children's perspectives on parental work’, Journal of Social Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruspini, E. (1999), ‘Longitudinal research and the analysis of social change’, Quality and Quantity, 33, 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldana, J. (2003), Longitudinal Qualitative Research: Analyzing Change Through Time, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (2003), ‘Cross-sectional profiling and longitudinal analysis: research notes on analysis in the longitudinal qualitative study, “Negotiating Transitions to Citizenship”‘, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 3, 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., Lister, R., Middleton, S. and Cox, L. (2005), ‘Young people as real citizens: towards an inclusionary understanding of citizenship’, Journal of Youth Studies, 8, 4, 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snape, D. and Spencer, L. (2003), ‘The foundations of qualitative research’, in Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice, London: Sage, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J. and Dillon, L. (2003), Quality in Qualitative Research: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence, London: Government Chief Social Researcher's Office, www.policyhub.gov.uk/evaluating_policy/qual_eval.asp.Google Scholar
Thomson, R. and Holland, J. (2003), ‘Hindsight, foresight and insight: the challenges of longitudinal qualitative research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 3, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, R., Plumridge, L. and Holland, J. (2003), ‘Longitudinal qualitative research: a developing methodology’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 3, 185–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallance, R. J. (2005), ‘Working with longitudinal qualitative data: using NVivo as an analytic tool’, Paper Presented at the 6th International Strategies in Qualitative Research Conference, Durham, 21–23 September 2005, www.qual-strategies.org/previous/2005/papers/Vallance/files/Vallance1.pdf (accessed 30 March 2007).Google Scholar
Walker, R. and Leisering, L. (1998), ‘New tools: towards a dynamic science of modern society’, in Leisering, L. and Walker, R. (eds), The Dynamics of Modern Society, Bristol: The Policy Press, pp. 17–33.Google Scholar
White, R. T. and Arzi, H. J. (2005), ‘Longitudinal studies: designs, validity, practicality, and value’, Research in Science Education, 35, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar