Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T07:48:07.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the armyworm Spodoptera mauritia acronyctoides Gn. (Lep., Noctuidae) in Sarawak (Malaysian Borneo)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

G. H. L. Rothschild
G. H. L. Rothschild
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Observations were made on the bionomics of Spodoptera mauritia acronyctoides Gn. in Malaysian Borneo (Sarawak) during an outbreak in 1967. The outbreak was discontinuous over about 6 000 sq. miles, affecting 25 000 acres of lowland and upland rice. In the insectary the durations of the various stages were: egg 2·9 days, first- to seventh-instar larvae respectively 3·1, 1·8, 2·2, 2·1, 2·2, 2·3 and 4·9 days, and pupa 8·4 days. Larval instars could usually be distinguished on head width and the width of the faecal pellets. Food consumption of the larvae was greatest during the final instar. During the outbreak the larvae were found mainly on young rice, and also on young maize; wild host-plants included grasses and sedges, but dicotyledonous plants were not attacked.

Females generally mated on the night following emergence, and the pre-oviposition period averaged 2·9 days. Fertilised females laid an average of 1 749 eggs, 80% of the potential total. Virgin females laid only 22% of the potential, and resorbed some of their oocytes. The mean longevity of fertilised females was 5·5 days. Fecundity was directly correlated with pupal weight or length, and the weights of pupae produced in wet-rice fields were significantly heavier than those from dry hill-rice sites. There was a significant correlation between the weight of frass produced (hence food consumed) by the seventh-instar larva and the weight of the pupal stage. Pupae from larvae in crowded cultures were significantly lighter than those reared singly.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , July 1969 , pp. 143 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anantanarayanan, K. P. & Ramakrishna Ayyar, T. V. (1937). Bionomics of the swarming caterpillar of paddy in South India.—Agriculture Live-Stk India 7, 725–734.Google Scholar
Bean, J. L. (1959). Frass size as an indicator of spruce budworm larval instars.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52, 605–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. S. (1962). The African army worm Spodoptera exempta (Walker) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae): a review of the literature.—57 pp., multigraph. London, Commonw. Inst. Ent.Google Scholar
Brown, E. S., Betts, E. & Rainey, R. C. (1969). Seasonal changes in distribution of the African armyworm Spodoptera exempta (Wlk.) (Lep., Noctuidae), with special reference to eastern Africa.—Bull. ent. Res. 58, 661–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. S. & Odiyo, P. (1968). The rate of feeding of the African army worm Spodoptera exempta (Walk.) and its significance for control operations.—E. Afr. agric. For. J. 33, 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, E. S. & Swaine, G. (1966). New evidence on the migration of moths of the African armyworm, Spodoptera exempta (Wlk.) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae).—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherian, M. C. & Anantanarayanan, K. P. (1937). Notes on the incidence of the swarming caterpillar of paddy.—Madras agric. J. 25, 45–49.Google Scholar
Commun, R. (1932). Un parasite des ma en Indochine: Spodoptera mauritia Boisd. (Noctuidae).—Bull. écon. Indochine 35, 154B–160B.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. A. (1964). The bionomics of swift moths. I. The ghost swift moth, Hepialus humuli (L).—Bull. ent. Res. 55, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, J. C. (1943). Phase variation in the armyworm, Laphygma exempta (Walk.).—Sci. Bull. Dep. Agric. For. Un. S. Afr. no. 234, 17 pp.Google Scholar
Heron, R. J. (1966). The reproductive capacity of the larch sawfly and some factors of concern in its measurement.—Can. Ent. 98, 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, J. C. (1920). The paddy swarming caterpillar (Spodoptera mauritia, Boisd.).—Trop. Agric. Ceylon 55, pp. 133–140.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. G. (1966). A functional system of adaptive dispersal by flight.—A. Rev. Ent. 11, 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalshoven, L. G. E. (1951). De plagen van de cultuurgewassen in Indonesië. Deel II.—pp. 513–1065. s'Gravenhage, W. van Hoeve.Google Scholar
Kasting, R. & McGinnis, A. J. (1962). Quantitative relationship between consumption and excretion of dry matter by larvae of the pale western cutworm, Agrotis orthogonia Morr. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).—Can. Ent. 94, 441–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, D. B. (1953). Effects of population density on larvae of Lepidoptera.—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 104, 543–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozina-Lozinskii, L. K. (1939). An expedition for the study of the ecology of the cotton noctuid. [In Russian]—Izv. azerb. Fil. Akad. Nauk SSSR 3, 137–138. (Original not seen. Rev. appl. Ent. (A) 29, 235–236.Google Scholar
Marcovitch, S. (1957). Forecasting armyworm outbreaks—a possibility.—J. econ. Ent. 50, 112–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthee, J. J. (1947). Phase variation in the lawn caterpillar (Spodoptera abyssinia Guen.)—J. ent. Soc. sth Afr. 10, 16–23.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F.Ed. (1963). The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations.—Mem. ent. Soc. Can. no. 31, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Nixon, G. E. J. (1937). Some Asiatic Telenominae (Hym. Proctotrupoidea).—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. (10) 20, 444–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otanes, F. Q. & Sison, P. L. (1952). Pests of rice.—Pop. Bull. Dep. Agr. nat. Res. Philippines.Google Scholar
Pond, D. D. (1961). Frass studies of the armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishna Ayyar, T. V. & Anantanarayanan, K. P. (1935). Agricultural meteorology in its relation to insect pests.—Madras agric. J. 23, 328–335.Google Scholar
Rivnay, E. & Meisner, J. (1966). The effects of rearing conditions on the immature stages and adults of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.).—Bull. ent. Res. 56, 623–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. H. (1933). Caterpillar plagues in grasslands and cultivation paddocks.—Qd agric. J. 39, 155–160.Google Scholar
Steinhaus, E. A. (1949). Principles of insect pathology.—757 pp. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Tanada, Y. (1966). Field observation of the biotic factors regulating the population of the armyworm, Pseudaletia unipuncta (Haworth).—Proc. Hawaii, ent. Soc. 19, 302–308.Google Scholar
Tanada, Y. & Beardsley, J. W. jr. (1958). A biological study of the lawn armyworm, Spodoptera mauritia (Boisduval), in Hawaii (Lepidoptera, Phalaenidae).—Proc. Hawaii. ent. Soc. 16, 411–436.Google Scholar
Waloff, N., Norris, M. J. & Broadhead, E. C. (1948). Fecundity and longevity of Ephestia elutella Hübner (Lep. Phycitidae).—Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 99, 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1965). The principles of insect physiology.—6th edn, 741 pp. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Williams, J. R. (1963). The reproduction and fecundity of the sugarcane stalk borer, Proceras sacchariphagus Bojer (Lep., Crambidae).—Proc. 11th Congr. int. Soc. Sug. Cane Technol., 611–625.Google Scholar