Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T07:37:52.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Market experience with modeling for defined-benefit pension funds: evidence from four countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2005

FRANK J. FABOZZI
Affiliation:
Yale University School of Management (e-mail: fabozzi321@aol.com)
SERGIO M. FOCARDI
Affiliation:
The Intertek Group (e-mail: interteksf@aol.com)
CAROLINE L. JONAS
Affiliation:
The Intertek Group (e-mail: intertekcj@aol.com)

Abstract

This paper takes a look at the modeling side of pension fund management. It is based on interviews with pension fund managers, regulators, consultants, and academics in four countries – the Netherlands, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The objective was to understand, through the experience of market participants, the role of modeling in managing defined-benefit pension funds. The 28 defined-benefit pension funds participating in the study have a total of €334 billion ($436 billion) assets under management. The findings of our study show that modeling is now considered an indispensable tool by many market participants. The need to manage the risk inherent in defined-benefit pension plans is the key motivation behind the growing use of modeling. In the Netherlands, for example, where private-sector plans did not experience serious underfunding problems after the 2000 market crash, the use of modeling is widespread and well-integrated in the decision-making process. Dutch regulators have recently mandated a risk-based approach and specified broad principles of sound modeling, including the marking to market of assets and liabilities.

Type
Issues and Policy
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)