Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T11:06:59.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SEEING DEMONS: AUTOPSY IN MAXIMUS OF TYRE'S ORATION 9 AND ITS ABSENCE IN APULEIUS’ ON THE GOD OF SOCRATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2016

Geoffrey C. Benson
Geoffrey C. Benson*
Affiliation:
Colgate Universitygeoffrey.benson@gmail.com
Get access

Extract

Apuleius’ On the God of Socrates (De Deo Socratis), a lecture on Platonic demonology and Socrates’ daimonion that dates to the second half of the second century CE, is a critical work in the assessment of Apuleius’ Platonism, but it also should play a larger role in our reconstruction of his public image than it has. This popular philosophical lecture focuses on the same theme as two Greek works from roughly the same time period: Plutarch's dialogue On the Daimonion of Socrates (περὶ τοῦ Σωϰράτους δαιμονίου) and Maximus of Tyre's Orations 8-9 (Διαλέξεις). Discussion of On the God of Socrates has centered on its relationship with these other texts, with the aim of comparing Apuleius’ argument about daimones with Plutarch's and Maximus’. The consensus view is that Plutarch's treatment of demonology has little in common with Apuleius’ (I present further evidence supporting the consensus near the end of this essay). On the other hand, many scholars assert Apuleius’ closest Greek model is Maximus of Tyre, a sophist with a Platonic orientation who wrote forty-one brief lectures on ethics and other philosophical subjects in the second century CE.

Type
Research Article
Information
Ramus , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , June 2016 , pp. 102 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © Aureal Publications 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babbitt, F.C. (tr.) (1927), Plutarch: Moralia Vol. 1 (London/Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Baltes, M., et al. (eds.) (2004), Apuleius: Über den Gott des Sokrates (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
Barra, G. (1960-1), ‘Il valore e il significato del “De Deo Socratis” di Apuleio’, AFLN 9, 67-119.Google Scholar
Beaujeu, J. (ed.) (1973), Apulée: opuscules philosophiques et fragments (Paris).Google Scholar
Bingenheimer, M. (tr.) (1993), Lucius Apuleius von Madaura: De deo Socratis (Frankfurt).Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (2012), ‘Apuleius and Carthage’, in Apuleius and Antonine Rome: Historical Essays (Toronto), 126-46.Google Scholar
Branham, R.B. (1989), Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Brunt, P.A. (1977), ‘From Epictetus to Arrian’, Athenaeum 55, 19-48.Google Scholar
Caracusi, E. (1978), ‘Gli hapax legomena nei Florida di Apuleio’, AAPal 19, 527-59.Google Scholar
De Romilly, J. (1975), Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Dickie, M.W. (2001), Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World (London).Google Scholar
Di Giovine, C. (1981), ‘Sulla presenza di Lucrezio nel De deo Socratis di Apuleio’, Orpheus n.s. 2, 114-23.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1977), The Middle Platonists: A Study of Platonism 80 B.C. to A.D. 220 (Ithaca NY).Google Scholar
Dodds, E.R. (1965), Pagan and Christian in an Age of Anxiety: Some Aspects of Religious Experience from Marcus Aurelius to Constantine (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Ebner, M., Gzella, H., Nesselrath, H.-G. and Ribbat, E. (eds.) (2001), Lukian: Die Lügenfreunde (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
Elsom, H. (1984), Apuleius and the Writing of Philosophy and Fiction in the 2nd Century AD (Diss. Cambridge).Google Scholar
Faraone, C. (1999), Ancient Greek Love Magic (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. (2009), ‘No Success like Failure: The Task of the Translator in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses’, in Paschalis, M., Panayotakis, S. and Schmeling, G. (eds.), Readers and Writers in the Ancient Novel (Groningen), 184-96.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. (2014), Apuleius’ Platonism: The Impersonation of Philosophy (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gaisser, J.H. (2008), The Fortunes of Apuleius and the Golden Ass: A Study in Transmission and Reception (Princeton).Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995), Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome (Princeton).Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (2002), Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Griffiths, J.G. (1975), Apuleius of Madauros: The Isis-Book (Metamorphoses, Book XI) (Leiden).Google Scholar
Habermehl, P. (1996), ‘Quaedam divinae mediae potestates: Demonology in Apuleius’ De Deo Socratis’, Groningen Colloquia on the Novel 7, 117-42.Google Scholar
Hall, J. (1981), Lucian's Satire (New York).Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J. (2000), Apuleius: A Latin Sophist (Oxford).Google Scholar
Harrison, S.J., Hilton, J.L. and Hunink, V.J.C. (eds. and trs.) (2001), Apuleius Rhetorical Works (Oxford).Google Scholar
Hijmans, B.L. (1987), ‘Apuleius Philosophus Platonicus’, ANRW 2.34.2, 395-475.Google Scholar
Hunink, V.J.C. (2004), ‘Plutarch and Apuleius’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D.M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch's Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Vol. I: Plutarch's Statesman and his Aftermath: Political, Philosophical and Literary Aspects (Leiden/Boston), 251-60.Google Scholar
Jones, C.P. (1986), Culture and Society in Lucian (Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Kenney, E.J. (ed. and tr.) (1990), Apuleius: Cupid and Psyche (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Keulen, W. (2004), ‘Gellius, Apuleius, and Satire on the Intellectual’, in Holford-Strevens, L. and Vardi, A. (eds.), The Worlds of Aulus Gellius (Oxford), 223-45.Google Scholar
Kim, L. (2010), Homer between Fiction and History in Imperial Greek Literature (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2010), A Comedy of Storytelling: Theatricality and Narrative in Apuleius’ Golden Ass (Heidelberg).Google Scholar
Koniaris, G.L. (1982), ‘On Maximus of Tyre: Zetemata (I)’, ClAnt 1, 87-121.Google Scholar
Koniaris, G.L. (1983), ‘On Maximus of Tyre: Zetemata (II)’, ClAnt 2, 212-50.Google Scholar
Koniaris, G.L. (ed.) (1995), Maximus Tyrius Philosophumena—ΔΙΑΛΕΞΕΙΣ (Berlin/New York).Google Scholar
Lamb, W.R.M. (tr.) (1925), Plato: Lysis, Symposium, Gorgias (London/New York).Google Scholar
Lane Fox, R. (1986), Pagans and Christians (San Francisco).Google Scholar
Lauwers, J. (2015), Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Sophistry in the High Roman Empire: Maximus of Tyre and Twelve Other Intellectuals (Leiden/Boston).Google Scholar
Lee, B.T. (2005), Apuleius’ Florida: A Commentary (Berlin/New York)Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (2002), Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life (Oxford).Google Scholar
López Cruces, J.L., and Daroca, J. Campos (eds.) (2005), Máximo de Tiro: Disertaciones Filosóficas (Madrid).Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997), Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Mattiaci, S. (2014), ‘Apuleius and Africitas’, in Lee, B.T., Finkelpearl, E. and Graverini, L. (eds.), Apuleius and Africa (London/New York), 87-111.Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (1978), Apuleio e il Platonismo (Florence).Google Scholar
Moreschini, C. (ed.) (1991), Apuleius De Philosophia Libri (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Müller, L. (1932), In Luciani Philopseuden Commentarius (Leopoli).Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (ed.) (2010), Plutarch, On the Daimonion of Socrates: Human Liberation, Divine Guidance, and Philosophy (Darmstadt).Google Scholar
ní Mheallaigh, K. (2014), Reading Fiction with Lucian: Fakes, Freaks and Hyperreality (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Ogden, D. (2007), In Search of the Sorcerer's Apprentice: The Traditional Tales of Lucian's Lover of Lies (Swansea).Google Scholar
Penwill, J.L. (1990), ‘Ambages Reciprocae: Reviewing Apuleius’ Metamorphoses’, Ramus 19, 1-25.Google Scholar
Perelman, C. (1982), The Realm of Rhetoric, tr. Kluback, W. (Notre Dame IN).Google Scholar
Pérez-Jean, B., and Fauquier, F. (eds.) (2014), Choix de conferences: religion et philosophie/Maxime de Tyr (Paris).Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2011), Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Graeco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion (Cambridge).Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2010), ‘Socrates’ δαιμόνιον in Maximus of Tyre, Apuleius, and Plutarch’, in Frazier, F. and Leão, D.F. (eds.), Tychè et Pronoia: La marche du monde selon Plutarque (Coimbra), 93-108.Google Scholar
Sage, E.T., and Gilleland, B.B. (eds.) (1969), Petronius: The Satiricon (New York).Google Scholar
Sandy, G. (1997), The Greek World of Apuleius: Apuleius and the Second Sophistic (Leiden).Google Scholar
Selden, D.L. (2014), ‘Apuleius and Afroasiatic Poetics’, in Lee, B.T., Finkelpearl, E. and Graverini, L. (eds.), Apuleius and Africa (London/New York), 205-70.Google Scholar
Slater, N. (1997), ‘Vision, Perception, and Phantasia in the Roman Novel’, in Picone, M. and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Der antike Roman und seine mittelalterliche Rezeption (Berlin), 89-105.Google Scholar
Timotin, A. (2012), La démonologie platonicienne: histoire de la notion de daimoōn de Platon aux derniers néoplatoniciens (Leiden/Boston).Google Scholar
Trapp, M.B. (ed.) (1994), Maximus Tyrius Dissertationes (Stuttgart).Google Scholar
Trapp, M.B. (tr.) (1997a), The Philosophical Orations of Maximus of Tyre (Oxford).Google Scholar
Trapp, M.B. (1997b), ‘Philosophical Sermons: The “Dialexeis” of Maximus of Tyre’, in ANRW 2.34.3, 1945-76.Google Scholar
Trzaskoma, S.M. (2003), ‘Apuleian Mediocrity in the De Deo Socratis’ (Unpublished Presentation, APA annual meeting).Google Scholar
Vallette, P. (1908), L'Apologie d'Apulée (Paris).Google Scholar
Van der Paardt, R.Th. (1981), ‘The Unmasked “I”: Apuleius Met. XI. 27’, Mnemosyne 34, 96-106.Google Scholar
Wälchli, P. (2003), Studien zu den literarischen Beziehungen zwischen Plutarch und Lukian (Munich/Leipzig).Google Scholar
Walsh, P.G. (1981), ‘Apuleius and Plutarch’, in Blumenthal, H.J. and Markus, R.A. (eds.), Neoplatonism and Early Christian Thought: Essays in Honour of A.H. Armstrong (London), 20-32.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2001), Greek Literature and the Roman Empire (Oxford).Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. and Bartsch, S. (2008), ‘Narrative’, in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Greek and Roman Novel (Cambridge), 237-57.Google Scholar
Winkler, J. (1991), ‘The Constraints of Eros’, in Faraone, C. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion (Oxford), 214-43.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (2006), ‘Awe and Opposition: The Ambivalent Presence of Lucretius in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses’, in Byrne, S.N., Cueva, E.P. and Alvares, J. (eds.), Authors, Authority and Interpreters in the Ancient Novel: Essays in Honor of Gareth L. Schmeling (Groningen), 317-39.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, M. (ed.) (2012), Apulei Metamorphoseon Libri XI (Oxford).Google Scholar