Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:13:51.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sixth Giant? Environmental Policy and the Labour Government, 1945–51

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2015

TONY FITZPATRICK
TONY FITZPATRICK*
Affiliation:
Sociology & Social Policy, Nottingham University, NG7 2RD, UK email: Tony.Fitzpatrick@nottingham.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The connections between social and environmental policies have a longer and more fertile history than is often appreciated. Ignoring that history is not just unfortunate in its own terms but may mean that we deprive ourselves of resources that could be useful in the future. Unfortunately, social policy histories avoid discussion of the natural environment, just as environmental histories avoid discussion of welfare services. This article therefore seeks to open up new debates and a new field of research. It focuses upon one of the key periods in the development of UK state welfare, the Labour government of 1945–51. It argues that Labour displayed an ambivalence toward the natural environment. Land nationalisation had long been an aspiration, but Labour drew back from its more radical ambitions. In policy terms, this gave rise to a dualism. Town and country planning became one of its enduring legacies, but more socialistic, redistributive measures fell by the wayside.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , January 2016 , pp. 65 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addison, P. (1985), Now the War is Over, London: BBC and Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Bevir, M. (2000), ‘Socialism, Civil Society, and the State in Modern Britain’, in Trentmann, F. (ed.) Paradoxes of Civil Society, Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Beyer, J. (2010), ‘The Same or Not the Same - On the Variety of Mechanisms of Path Dependence’, International Journal of the Social Sciences, 5 (1): 1–11.Google Scholar
Blundell, V. H. (1994), ‘Flawed Land Acts, 1947–76’, in Tideman, N. (ed.) Land and Taxation, London: Shepheard Walwyn.Google Scholar
Bulkeley, H. (2013), Cities and Climate Change, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer, S. (2009), ‘Politics in Time meets the Politics of Time: Historical Institutionalism and the EU Timescape’, Journal of European Public Policy, 16 (2): 307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, P. (1997), Social Movements in Britain, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clapson, M. (2005), ‘Cities, Suburbs, Countryside’ in Addison, P. & Jones, H. (eds) A Companion to Contemporary Britain 1939–2000, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Corkindale, J. (2001), Reforming Land Use Planning, London: IEA.Google Scholar
Cullingworth, B. and Nadin, V. (2006), Town and Country Planning, 14th ed., Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, H. (1962), High Tide and After: Memoirs, 1945–60, London: Frederick Muller Ltd.Google Scholar
Daly, H. (2007), Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Davy, B. (2009), ‘The Poor and the Land: Poverty, property, planning’, Town Planning Review, 80 (3): 227–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davy, B. and Pellissery, S. (2011), ‘Review Essay: Climate Change and Global Social Policy’, Global Social Policy, 11 (1): 106–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davy, B. and Pellissery, S. (2013), ‘The Citizenship Promise (Un)fulfilled: The Right to Housing in Informal Settings’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 22: 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, D. (1970), Historians’ Fallacies, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2014), Climate Change and Poverty: A New Agenda for Developed Nations, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. (2009), The Evolution of the British Welfare State, 4th ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, C. (2007), Labour and the Countryside, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, J. (1997), William Beveridge, revised edition, Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, J. (1999), ‘The Rise and Fall of Radical Reconstruction in 1940s Britain’, Twentieth Century British History, 10 (2): 137–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessey, P. (1993), Never Again, London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Howlett, M. and Rayner, J. (2006), ‘Understanding the Historical Turn in the Policy Sciences: A Critique of Stochastic, Narrative, Path Dependency and Process-Sequencing Models of Policy-Making over Time’, Policy Sciences, 39: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J., Hwang, G-J. and Kühner, S. (2008), ‘Between Ideas, Institutions and Interests: Analysing Third Way Welfare Reform Programmes in Germany and the United Kingdom’, Journal of Social Policy, 37 (2): 207–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, A. (2005), A Critique of the Use of Path Dependency in Policy Studies’, Public Administration, 83 (3): 553–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1954), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (2009), Essays in Persuasion, New York: Classic House Books.Google Scholar
King, A. and Crewe, I. (2013), The Blunders of our Governments, London: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Koch, M. and Fritz, M. (2014), ‘Building the Eco-Social State: Do Welfare Regimes Matter?’, Journal of Social Policy, 41 (4): 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kynaston, D. (2007), Austerity Britain: 1945–51, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Linklater, A. (2014), Owning the Earth, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lockyer, J. (2010), ‘Intentional Community Carbon Reduction and Climate Change Action: From eco-villages to transition towns’, in Peters, M., Fudge, S. & Jackson, T. (eds) Low Carbon Communities, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lowe, R. (2005), The Welfare State in Britain since 1945, 3rd ed., Basingstoke: Pagrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowndes, V. and Roberts, M. (2013), Why Institutions Matter, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, J. and Pierson, P. (2001), ‘The Comparative Political Economy of Pension Reform’, in Pierson, P. (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nehring, H. (2005), ‘The Growth of Social Movements’ in Addison, P. & Jones, H. (eds) A Companion to Contemporary Britain 1939–2000, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Three Worlds of Welfare State Research’, Comparative Political Studies, 33 (6/7): 791–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001), ‘Investigating the Welfare State at Century's End’, in Pierson, P. (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004), Politics in Time, Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimlott, B. (1985), Hugh Dalton, Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Raadschelders, J. (1998), ‘Evolution, Institutional Analysis and Path Dependency: An Administrative History Perspective on Fashionable Approaches and Concepts,’ International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64: 565–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radice, G. (2008), The Tortoise and the Hares, London: Politico's.Google Scholar
Rydin, Y. (2003), Urban and Environmental Planning in the UK, 2nd ed., Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffrin, A. (2014), ‘The New Social Risks and Opportunities of Climate Change’, in Fitzpatrick, T. (ed.) International Handbook on Social Policy & the Environment, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schumacher, E. F. (1973), Small is Beautiful, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sheail, J. (2002), An Environmental History of Twentieth Century Britain, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snell, C. and Haq, G. (2014), The Short Guide to Environmental Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, J. (2003), ‘The Countryside, Planning, and Civil Society in Britain, 1926–1947’, in Harris, J. (ed.) Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. (1997), A Claim on the Countryside, Edinburgh: Keele University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (1999), ‘Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics’, Annual Review of Political Science, 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2003), ‘How Institutions Evolve: Insights from Comparative Historical Analysis’, in Mahoney, J. & Rueschemeyer, D. (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tichelar, M. (2003), ‘The Conflict over Property Rights during the Second World War: The Labour Party's Abandonment of Land Nationalisation’, Twentieth Century British History, 14 (2): 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmins, N. (1996), The Five Giants, London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Titmuss, R. (1950), Problems of Social Policy, London: HMSO & Longman's.Google Scholar
Weiler, P. (2013), ‘Labour and the Land: The Making of the Community Land Act, 1976’, Contemporary British History, 27 (4): 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar