Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-27T18:31:59.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence that three dimensions of psychosis have a distribution in the general population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2017

N. C. STEFANIS
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London
M. HANSSEN
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London
N. K. SMIRNIS
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London
D. A. AVRAMOPOULOS
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London
I. K. EVDOKIMIDIS
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London
C. N. STEFANIS
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London
H. VERDOUX
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London
J. VAN OS
Affiliation:
From the University Mental Health Research Institute (UMHRI), Athens, Greece; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, European Graduate School of Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, University Victor Segalen and Hôpital Charles Perrens, Bordeaux, France; and Division of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, London

Abstract

Background. The aims of the study were: first to examine, using clinical symptoms of patients as a template, whether the correlated but independent dimensions of positive, negative and depressive symptoms that have been identified in clinical psychosis, also have a distribution as non-clinical experiences in the general population; and second, to establish to what degree population variation in experience of positive and negative features of psychosis is actually independent of experience of depression.

Method. In a representative population sample of 932 young men, we measured experiences of positive, negative and depressive features of psychosis, using a 40-item self-report instrument. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare the fit of hypothesized one-, two- and three-factor solutions.

Results. A three-factor model of separate depressive, positive and negative dimensions provided a better fit to the data than either a two-factor or unidimensional model. All three dimensions were correlated with each other, but also showed good discriminant validity in relation to established scales, confirming their relative independence.

Conclusion. The data suggest that the correlated dimensions of clinical psychosis also have a distribution in the general population, and that depressive symptoms may form an integral part of psychosis-like experiences in the general population.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)