Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T09:56:00.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dealing with UK Museum Collections: Law, Ethics and the Public/Private Divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2015

Janet Ulph
Janet Ulph*
Affiliation:
AHRC Fellow, School of Law, University of Leicester. Email: ju13@le.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In the UK, there is a public perception that, if a cultural object is given to a museum, it will remain in its collections forever. But does UK law reflect this? This article analyses UK law and discusses whether a commercial approach is not always well suited to serve the needs of the museum sector and whether there should be more thought given to the public nature of museums. It calls for law reform in order to ensure that UK law and ethical guidance relating to deaccessioning and disposals from collections is sufficient to maintain public trust, so that people continue to visit museums and to offer objects for their collections.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 22 , Issue 2-3 , August 2015 , pp. 177 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Audit Commission. 1991. The Road to Wigan Pier – Managing Local Authority Museums and Art Galleries. Local Government Report No. 3. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Babbidge, Adrian, Ewles, Rosemary, and Smith, Julian. 2006. Moving to Museum Trusts: Learning from Experience. Egeria and Farrer & Co.: Museums Libraries and Archives Council, www.egeria.org.uk/index.php/download_file/view/12/73/ (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Bailey, Stephen and Mark, Elliott. 2009. “Taking Local Government Seriously: Democracy, Autonomy and the Constitution.” Cambridge Law Journal 68, no. 2: 436–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britain Thinks, . Public Perceptions of —and Attitudes to—the Purposes of Museums in Society. 2013. Museums Association Report, http://www.museumsassociation.org/download?id=954916 (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Charity Commission. 2002. “Museums and Art Galleries Report” R10 (Version 08/02), http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/media/95113/rr10text.pdf (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Charity Commission. 2013. “Risk Framework.” Policy Paper. Gov.UK, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/risk-framework-charity-commission, direct link available at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/313453/risk-framework-our-regulatory-approach-to-protecting-the-public_s-interest-in-charity.pdf (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Cottesloe, Lord. 1964. The Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Sale of Works of Public Bodies. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Fincham, Derek. 2011. “Deacccession of Art from the Public Trust.” Art, Antiquity and Law 16, no. 2: 1–37.Google Scholar
Heal, Sharon. 2006. “The Great Giveaway.” Museums Journal 106, no. 10: 32–35.Google Scholar
Holborow, Will. 2008. The Disposal of Heritage Assets. London: DCMS.Google Scholar
House of Commons, Culture Media and Sport Committee. 2007. Caring for our Collections: Sixth Report of Session 2006–07, Vol. 1. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
James, TGH. 1963. “The Northampton Statue of Sekhemka.” The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 49: 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, Tiffany. 2011. “Just Say No: You Cannot Be Too Careful in Embracing Disposal.” In Museums and the Disposal Debate, edited by Davies, Peter, 72–82. Edinburgh: Museums Etc. Publishing.Google Scholar
Kawashima, Nobuko. 1997. Museum Management in a Time of Change: impacts of cultural policy on museums in Britain 1979–1997. Working Paper. Centre for the Study of Cultural Policy, University of Warwick.Google Scholar
Law Commission. 2013. Fiduciary Duties of Investment Intermediaries. Consultation Paper, No 215. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
Law Commission. 2014. Social Investment by Charities. Consultation Paper, No. 216. London: The Stationery Office Limited.Google Scholar
Lawley, Ian. 2003. “Local Authority Museums and the Modernizing Government Agenda in England.” Museum and Society 1, no. 2: 75–86.Google Scholar
Mahon, Denis. 1988. “Disposing of Disposal.” The Burlington Magazine 130, no. 1027: 731–34.Google Scholar
Museums Association. 2008. Code of Ethics. London: Museum Association, http://www.museumsassociation.org/download?id=944515 (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Museums Association. 2014a. “Disposal Toolkit: Guidelines for Museums,” http://www.museumsassociation.org/collections/disposal-toolkit, direct link at http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/pdf/Disposal_Toolkit.pdf (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Museums Association. 2014b. “Disposal Toolkit, Appendix 4: Additional Guidance on Financially Motivated Disposal,” http://www.museumsassociation.org/collections/disposal-toolkit, direct link at http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/media/uploads/pdf/Disposal_Toolkit_Appendix_4.pdf (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
National Museums Directors’ Council (NMDC). 2003. “Too much stuff? Disposal from Museums,” http://www.nationalmuseums.org.uk/media/documents/publications/too_much_stuff.pdf (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar
Robertson Ian, . 1995. “Infamous Deaccessions.” In Collections Management, edited by Fahy, Anne, 168–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saumarez Smith, Charles. 1989. “Museums, Artefacts and Meanings.” In New Museology, edited by Vergo, Peter, 6–21. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
“The Sale of Works Out of Museums.” 1960. The Burlington Magazine 102, no. 682: 3–4.Google Scholar
Ulph, Janet. 1996. “The Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act, Co-ownership and the Rogue Seller.” Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly 1996, no. 1: 93–107.Google Scholar
Ulph, Janet. 2001. “Sale and Leaseback Agreements in a World of Title Relativity.” Modern Law Review 64, no. 3: 481–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulph, Janet, and Smith, Ian. 2012. The Illicit Trade in Art and Antiquities: International Recovery and Criminal and Civil Liability. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Vize, R. 1999. “Good, Better, Best.” Museums Journal 99, no. 8: 39–43.Google Scholar
Warren, Jeremy, ed. 1996. The Legal Status of Museum Collections in the United Kingdom. London: Museums and Galleries Commission.Google Scholar