Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:00:45.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Keplerian consequences of an impact on an asteroid and their relevance for a deflection demonstration mission

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2006

Andreas Rathke
Affiliation:
Astrium GmbH, Dept. AED41, 88039 Friedrichshafen, Germany e-mail: andreas.rathke@astrium.eads.net
Dario Izzo
Affiliation:
European Space Agency, Advanced Concepts Team, EUI-ACT, ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The Netherlands e-mail: dario.izzo@esa.int
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We investigate upon the change of an asteroid orbit caused by an impact. We find that, given the assumption of two dimensional motion, the asteroid displacement may be described by an analytic and explicit expression that is the vectorial sum of a radial component and a component along the asteroid velocity. The new formulation bridges the gap between the study of short-term effects, using numerical methods and the analytic study of secular changes of the asteroid orbit. The relation of the method to the established formulations is described and the known results are derived as limiting cases.

The application of the new method for the performance evaluation of an asteroid deflection demonstration mission is illustrated. In such a mission the measurement of the change of the asteroid orbit by an impact will be conducted by radio-ranging to a spacecraft orbiting the deflected asteroid. Hence the measurement will primarily be sensitive to the deflection projected onto the Earth-asteroid line of sight. We discuss how the new formulation of the deflection can conveniently be employed for the estimation of the measurement accuracy and the optimal planning of a deflection demonstration mission.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2007

References

A'Hearn, M.F. et al. , 2005, Science 310, 258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battin, R.H. 1994, An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics AIAA Education Series (AIAA, Washington, DC)Google Scholar
Carnelli, I., Galvez, A. & Izzo, D. 2006 “Don Quijote: A NEO deflection precursor mission” submitted to NASA Workshop: Near-Earth Object Detection, Characterization, and Threat Mitigation, http://www.esa.int/gsp/ACT/doc/ACT-RPR-4200-IC-NASANEOWS-DonQuijote.pdfGoogle Scholar
Carusi, A., Valsecchi, G.B., D'Abramo, G. & Boattini, A. 2002, Icarus 159, 417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clohessy, W.H. & Wiltshire, R.S. 1960, “Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous,” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences 27, 653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, B.A. 2001, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 24, 1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izzo, D. 2005, “On the deflection of Potentially Hazardous Objects” in: Proceedings of the 2005 AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Conference (Univelt Inc.), Paper AAS 05-150, Vol. 121, p. 611Google Scholar
Izzo, D., Bourdoux, A., Walker, R. & Ongaro, F. 2006, Acta Astronautica 59, 294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izzo, D., “Optimisation of interplanetary trajectories for impulsive and continuous asteroid deflection,” 2006, to appear in Journal of Guidance Control and DynamicsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahle, R., Hahn, G. & Kührt, E. 2006, Icarus 182, 482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, C.L. & Border, J.S. 2000, Radiometric tracking techniques for deep-space navigation Deep-space communications and navigation series 00-11, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, http://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/Monograph/series1/Descanso1_all.pdfGoogle Scholar
Tschauner, J. & Hempel, P. 1965, “Rendezvous zu einem in elliptischer Bahn umlaufenden Ziel,” Astronautica Acta 11, 104Google Scholar
Valsecchi, G.B., Milani, A., Gronchi, G.F. & Chesley, S.R. 2003, Astron Astrophys., 408, 1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar