Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:50:30.869Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-traditional investments: key considerations for insurers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2015

Abstract

Life insurers have historically relied upon investment markets as a key source of profit and crucially have been able to do this while embarking on relatively “vanilla” investment strategies. In the current low-yield environment, broadening their investment horizons is critical to maintaining profitability. This paper summarises some relevant external literature and the working party’s own research in understanding the potential benefits and pitfalls for insurers seeking to invest in non-traditional assets. The objective of this paper is to help educate and promote understanding by all (the many) relevant parties. In doing so, we hope to help organisations to achieve some further economic success for the ultimate benefit of society. Although this paper has primarily been written from the perspective of a life insurer, we hope it will be of interest to a much wider audience. Many of the asset classes considered here are relevant to general insurers, pension funds and the wider capital markets. It is very important to note that this paper does not contain investment advice and the analysis represents the views of the individuals and the working party and not the companies which they represent or the Profession. This paper does not make any comment as to the suitability (or otherwise) of specific investments for particular investors.

Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Copyright
© Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Members of the Non-Traditional Investments Working Party: Niall Clifford (Mercer), Eamon Comerford (Milliman), Edward Conway (Bank of America Merrill Lynch), Eugene Dimitriou (PIMCO), Ross Evans (Hyman Robertson), Thomas Gormley (Assured Guaranty), Justin Grainger (Alpha Real Capital), Eliza Gu (Rogge Global Partners), Andrew Hammacott (Independent consultant), Belinda Hue (Independent consultant), Gareth Jones (MGM Advantage), Irina Kendix (Aviva Plc), Brian McCormack (Aviva UK Life), Gareth Mee (Chair, EY), Stephen Metcalfe (Prudential Plc), Lucian Rautu (Independent consultant), Nick Sinclair (Standard Life Plc), Grisha Spivak (Vice Chair, BlackRock), Jelena Strelets (Nomura International Plc), Russell Ward (Milliman), Keli Zhang (Towers Watson).

References

Bank of England (2014a). Solvency II – matching adjustment asset eligibility, Bank of England, London, available at http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Documents/solvency2/matchingadjustmentasseteligibilityjune2014.pdf (accessed 21 May 2015).Google Scholar
Bank of England (2014b). Solvency II – matching adjustment, Bank of England, London, available at http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Documents/solvency2/matchingadjustmentletteroct2014.pdf (accessed 21 May 2015).Google Scholar
Insurance Europe (2014). European insurance in figures, Insurance Europe, Brussels, available at http://www.insuranceeurope.eu/uploads/Modules/Publications/european-insurance-in-figures-2.pdf (accessed 21 May 2015).Google Scholar