Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T17:41:47.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

IMPERIAL, ANGLOPHONE, GEOPOLITICAL, WORLDLY: EVALUATING THE “GLOBAL” IN VICTORIAN STUDIES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2015

Tanya Agathocleous*
Affiliation:
Hunter College and the Graduate Center, The City University of New York

Extract

In the last decade or so, Victorian studies – the only major literary field identified with a British ruler – has begun a slow but inexorable shift away from its traditional nation-based parameters. A cursory glance through the book review section of prominent Victorianist journals reveals that approximately half of new books reviewed treat subjects that extend beyond Britain and British literature: Ireland, India, slavery, settler literature, Continental literature, and global technological and media networks are all examples. While this development reflects broader trends in the discipline, in the humanities, and in public discourse as a whole, arguments about the desirability of expanding the scope of Victorian studies have turned largely on the particular inaptness of the national frame for the Victorian period. Since the 1980s, postcolonial critics such as Edward Said, Gayatri Spivak, and Gauri Viswanathan have argued for the significance of Britain's vast empire to its literature and the very existence of a British literary canon, as well as to literature produced in the colonies. More recently, Victorianists such as Margaret Cohen and Carolyn Dever, Amanda Claybaugh, Caroline Levine, Sharon Marcus, and Julia Sun-Joo Lee have stressed other transnational contexts for Victorian literature, noting that Victorian writers themselves were polylingual and comparative in their understanding of both literature and culture and that “even in its heyday, print culture was international and the nation was a relative, hybrid, comparative category” (Marcus 682).

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

WORKS CONSIDERED

Agathocleous, Tanya, and Rudy, Jason, eds. “Victorian Cosmopolitanisms” [Special Issue]. Victorian Literature and Culture 38.2 (2010): 319616. Web. 30 Oct. 2014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Antoinette. Empire in Question: Reading, Writing, and Teaching British Imperialism. Durham: Duke UP, 2011.Google Scholar
Gibson, Mary Ellis. Indian Angles: English Verse in Colonial India from Jones to Tagore. Athens: Ohio UP, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Mary Ellis, ed. Anglophone Poetry in Colonial India, 1780–1913: A Critical Anthology. Athens: Ohio UP, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren. The Victorian Geopolitical Aesthetic: Realism, Sovereignty, and Transnational Experience. New York: Oxford UP, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodlad, Lauren, and Julia, M. Wright, eds. “Victorian Internationalisms” [Special Issue]. Romanticism and Victorianism on the Net 48. (2007). Web. 30 Oct. 2014Google Scholar
Hewitt, Martin, ed. The Victorian World. London: Routledge, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Sharon. “Same Difference? Transnationalism, Comparative Literature, and Victorian Studies.” Victorian Studies 45.4 (2003): 677–86. Web. 30 Oct. 2014.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, Pablo, ed. “Victorian World Literatures” [Special Issue]. The Yearbook of English Studies 41.2 (2011): 1–139. Web. 30 Oct 2014.Google Scholar