Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:45:09.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisionism Reconsidered: Exports and American Intervention in World War I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2007

Benjamin O. Fordham
Benjamin O. Fordham
Affiliation:
Binghamton University (SUNY), E-mail: bfordham@binghamton.edu
Get access

Abstract

Why did the United States intervene in World War I, breaking with its long tradition of noninvolvement in European political and military conflicts? During the 1920s and 1930s, many “revisionist” historians argued that American efforts to protect its trade with the Allies ultimately led to intervention. The logic of the revisionist position closely parallels the contemporary liberal case that interdependence promotes peace but arrives at different conclusions about the relationship between trade and conflict. Historians have largely abandoned this economic interpretation of American intervention, but data on the impact of the wartime export boom on the United States suggest that it should be reconsidered. The export boom was so large that it would have been difficult to ignore, and its progress corresponds to the timing of important decisions leading to American belligerency. An analysis of congressional voting on war-related measures also suggests that export income helped shape politicians' views of the war.I would like to thank Katherine Barbieri, John Coogan, David Clark, Jeffry Frieden, Jack Levy, Brian Lai, Timothy McKeown, David Painter, Strom Thacker, and participants in the world politics workshop at Binghamton University, the political economy workshop at Harvard University, and the Department of Political Science at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, for their many comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this article. Lisa Martin and several anonymous reviewers at International Organization also made many valuable suggestions. I am especially grateful to Thomas Walker, whose good-natured skepticism prompted me to write this paper. An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Any remaining errors and misinterpretations are my responsibility.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 277 - 310
Copyright
© 2007 The IO Foundation and Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ambrosius, Lloyd E. 1991. Wilsonian Statecraft: Theory and Practice of Liberal Internationalism During World War I. Wilmington, Del.: SR Books.
Bailey, Michael, Judith Goldstein, and Barry R. Weingast. 1997. The Institutional Roots of American Trade Policy: Politics, Coalitions, and International Trade. World Politics 49 (3):309–38.Google Scholar
Balke, Nathan S., and Robert J. Gordon. 1989. The Estimation of Prewar Gross National Product: Methodology and New Evidence. Journal of Political Economy 97 (1):38–92.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Katherine. 2002. The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Barnes, Harry Elmer. 1926. The Genesis of the World War: An Introduction to the Problem of War Guilt. New York: Knopf.
Bearce, David H. 2003. Grasping the Commercial Institutional Peace. International Studies Quarterly 47 (3):347–70.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles Austin. 1936. The Devil Theory of War. New York: Vanguard Press.
Bemis, Samuel Flagg. 1947. The First Gun of a Revisionist Historiography for the Second World War. Journal of Modern History 19 (1):55–59.Google Scholar
Bensel, Richard F. 1984. Sectionalism and American Political Development, 1880–1980. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Birdsall, Paul. 1939. Neutrality and Economic Pressures, 1914–1917. Science & Society 3 (2):217–28.Google Scholar
Borchard, Edwin, and William Potter Lage. 1940. Neutrality for the United States. 2d ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Buehrig, Edward H. 1955. Woodrow Wilson and the Balance of Power. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Burk, Kathleen. 1985. Britain, America, and the Sinews of War, 1914–1918. Boston: George Allen & Unwin.
Calhoun, Frederick S. 1986. Power and Principle: Armed Intervention in Wilsonian Foreign Policy. Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press.
Cohen, Warren I. 1967. The American Revisionists: The Lessons of Intervention in World War I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Coogan, John W. 1981. The End of Neutrality: The United States, Britain, and Maritime Rights, 1899–1915. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Coogan, John W. 1994. Wilsonian Diplomacy in War and Peace. In American Foreign Relations Reconsidered, 1890–1993, edited by Gordon Martel, 71–89. New York: Routledge.
Cooper, John Milton, Jr. 1969. The Vanity of Power: American Isolationism and the First World War, 1914–1917. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood.
Devlin, Patrick. 1975. Too Proud to Fight: Woodrow Wilson's Neutrality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Engelbrecht, Helmut Carol, and Frank Cleary Hanighen. 1935. Merchants of Death: A Study of the International Armament Industry. New York: Dodd, Mead.
Fowler, Alan. 2000. Impact of the First World War on the Lancashire Cotton Industry and Its Workers. In The First World War and the International Economy, edited by Chris Wrigely, 76–98. Northhampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar.
Freud, Sigmund, and William C. Bullitt. 1967. Thomas Woodrow Wilson, Twenty-Eighth President of the United States: A Psychological Study. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gallagher, John, and Ronald Robinson. 1953. The Imperialism of Free Trade. Economic History Review, 2d series 6 (1):1–15.Google Scholar
Gartzke, Erik, Quan Li, and Charles Boehmer. 2001. Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict. International Organization 55 (2):391–438.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Juliette L. George. 1964. Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A Personality Study. New York: Dover.
Goemans, Hein Erich. 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination in the First World War. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Grattan, Clinton Hartley. 1929. Why We Fought. New York: Vanguard Press.
Hannigan, Robert E. 2002. The New World Power: American Foreign Policy, 1898–1917. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Hardach, Gerd. 1977. The First World War, 1914–1918. London: Penguin.
Kennan, George F. 1951. American Diplomacy, 1900–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kennedy, David M. 1980. Over Here: The First World War and American Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kennedy, Ross A. 2001. Woodrow Wilson, World War I, and an American Conception of National Security. Diplomatic History 25 (1):1–31.Google Scholar
Knock, Thomas J. 1992. To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. New York: Oxford University Press.
Levy, Jack S. 2003. Economic Interdependence, Opportunity Costs, and Peace. In Economic Interdependence and International Conflict, edited by Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins, 127–47. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Link, Arthur Stanley. 1960. Wilson. Vol. 3, The Struggle for Neutrality, 1914–1915. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Link, Arthur Stanley. 1964. Wilson. Vol. 4, Confusions and Crisis, 1915–1916. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Link, Arthur Stanley. 1965. Wilson. Vol. 5, Campaigns for Progressivism and Peace, 1916–1917. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Lipsey, Robert E. 1963. Price and Quantity Trends in the Foreign Trade of the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Jon C. Pevehouse. 2000. Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict. International Organization 54 (4):775–808.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Brian M. Pollins. 2003. Interdependence and Conflict: An Introduction. In Economic Interdependence and International Conflict, edited by Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins, 1–28. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
May, Ernest R. 1959. The World War and American Isolation, 1914–1917. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Millis, Walter. 1935. Road to War: America, 1914–1917. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Morrow, James D. 1999. How Could Trade Affect Conflict? Journal of Peace Research 36 (4):481–89.Google Scholar
National Bureau of Economic Research. 2001. NBER Macrohistory Database. Available at 〈http://www.nber.org/databases/macrohistory/contents/〉. Accessed 16 January 2007.
National Bureau of Economic Research. 2006. Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions. Available at 〈http://www.nber.org/cycles.html/〉. Accessed 1 December 2006.
Oneal, John R., and Bruce M. Russett. 1997. The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly 41 (2):267–93.Google Scholar
Polachek, Solomon William. 1980. Conflict and Trade. Journal of Conflict Resolution 24 (1):55–78.Google Scholar
Ripsman, Norrin M., and Jean-Marc F. Blanchard. 1996. Commercial Liberalism Under Fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936. Security Studies 6 (2):4–50.Google Scholar
Seymour, Charles. 1964. American Diplomacy During the World War. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.
Simmons, Beth. 2003. Pax Mercatoria and the Theory of the State. In Economic Interdependence and International Conflict, edited by Edward D. Mansfield and Brian M. Pollins, 31–43. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Smith, Daniel Malloy. 1965. The Great Departure: The United States and World War I, 1914–1920. New York: Wiley.
Smith, Tony. 1994. America's Mission. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Steigerwald, David. 2000. The Reclamation of Woodrow Wilson? In Paths to Power, edited by Michael J. Hogan, 148–75. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stromberg, Roland. 1977. On Cherchez Le Financier: Comments on the Economic Interpretation of World War I. History Teacher 10 (3):435–43.Google Scholar
Tansill, Charles Callan. 1938. America Goes to War. Boston: Little, Brown.
Tarrant, V. E. 1989. The U-Boat Offensive, 1914–1945. Annapolis, Md.: Naval Institute Press.
Tilly, Charles. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the State Back In, edited by Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, 169–91. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trubowitz, Peter. 1998. Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1917. Abstract of the Census of Manufactures, 1914. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1923. Census of the United States, 1920. Vol. XI, Mines and Quarries, 1919. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1921. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1920. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1923. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1922. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 2007. U.S. Economic Accounts. Available at 〈http://www.bea.gov〉. Accessed 16 March 2007.