Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:20:34.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Surface Histories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2015

Mathias Grote  and
Max Stadler
Mathias Grote
Affiliation:
Institut für Geschichtswissenschaften, Humboldt-Universität zu, Berlin E-mail: mathias.grote@hu-berlin.de
Max Stadler
Affiliation:
Science Studies, ETH Zurich E-mail: max.stadler@wiss.gess.ethz.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The first section of this issue brings together four essays on “surfaces” – a subject matter which might seem conspicuous or, indeed, palpable enough. Just think of the sheets of paper, window panes, and haptic interfaces surrounding you: the world, evidently, is diffused with surfaces, membranes, and boundaries of all sorts. Some of these things have been salient, for obvious reasons in fields such as media studies, or implicit in notions such as “boundary object”: the retina, photographic plates, basilar membranes, the skin, or various forms of “displays” immediately come to mind. Not even mentioning their immense metaphoricity, surfaces are the entities that make things visible, inscribable, or knowable. But not all of them have been so salient. In fact, most surface-phenomena arguably – and, typically, for similarly obvious reasons – haven't received much scholarly notice at all: plastic wraps, lacquers, lubricants, coatings, silicon wavers, cell membranes, glass, plant leaves, the ozone layer.

Type
Topical Section: Surfaces in the History of Modern Science: Inscribing, Separating, Enclosing
Information
Science in Context , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 311 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bangham, Alec D., Hill, Martyn W., and Miller, N. G. A.. 1974. “Preparation and Use of Liposomes as Models of Biological Membranes.” In Methods in Membrane Biology, edited by Korn, E. D., 1–68. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Bryden, Charles L., and Dickey, George D.. 1923. A Text Book of Filtration: Industrial Filtration and the Various Types of Filters Used. Easton PA: Chemical Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Max to Efraim Racker, 25.1.1966, Delbrück Papers, California Institute of Technology Box 18, Folder 8.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Max 1969. “A Physicist's Renewed Look at Biology – Twenty Years Later.” Nobel Lecture. http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1969/delbruck-lecture.html (last accessed February 4, 2015).Google Scholar
Ede, Andrew. 2007. The Rise and Decline of Colloid Science in North America, 1900–1935: The Neglected Dimension. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Galloway, Alexander. 2012. The Interface Effect. Cambridge UK and Malden MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Harwood, John. 2012. The Interface: IBM and the Transformation of Corporate Design, 1945/1976. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hardy, William B. [1926] 1970. “Films,” #47. In The Royal Institution. Library of Science, Volume 9 (being the Friday Evening Discourses in Physical Sciences Held at the Royal Institution: 1851–1939), edited by Bragg, Lawrence and Porter, George, 109–13. London: Applied Science Publisher.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Christoph. 2001. “Zwei Schichten: Netzhaut und Fotografie, 1860/1890.” Fotogeschichte. Beiträge zur Geschichte und Ästhetik der Fotografie, 21–38.Google Scholar
Kremer, Richard L. 1997. “The Eye as Inscription Device in the 1870s: Optograms, Cameras, and the Photochemistry of Vision.” In Biology Integrating Scientific Fundamentals: Contributions to the History of Interrelations between Biology, Chemistry, and Physics from the 18th to the 20th Centuries, edited by Hoppe, Brigitte, 360–381. München: Institut für Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Landecker, Hannah. 2005. “Cellular Features: Microcinematography and Early Film Theory.” Critical Inquiry 31 (4):903–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landecker, Hannah. 2007. Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies. Harvard: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otis, Laura. 1999. Membranes: Metaphors of Invasion in Nineteenth-Century Literature, Science, and Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, J. Andrew. 2003. “Lives of the Cell.” Journal of the History of Biology 36 (1):1–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, Nicolas. 1999. Picture Control. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rideal, Eric K. 1926. Surface Chemistry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 2004. “Science Whose Business Is Bursting: Soap Bubbles as Commodities in Classical Physics.” In Things that Talk: Object Lessons from Science and Art, edited by Daston, Lorraine, 147–194. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
Schmeck, Harold M. Jr. 1979. “‘Guided missiles’ can aid targeting of drugs.” New York Times, April 17, p. C1.Google Scholar
Star, Susan L., and Griesemer, John. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (4):387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanford, Charles. 2004. Ben Franklin Stilled the Waves: An Informal History of Pouring Oil on Water with Reflections on the Ups and Downs of Scientific Life in General. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Arburg, Hans-Georg, ed. 2008. Mehr als Schein: Ästhetik der Oberfläche in Film, Kunst, Literatur und Theater. Zürich: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Ward, Janet. 2001. Weimar Surfaces: Urban Visual Culture in 1920s Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar