Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T00:32:51.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFICIENCY OF LINEAR ESTIMATORS UNDER HEAVY-TAILEDNESS: CONVOLUTIONS OF α-SYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2007

Rustam Ibragimov
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Abstract

This paper focuses on the analysis of efficiency, peakedness, and majorization properties of linear estimators under heavy-tailedness assumptions. We demonstrate that peakedness and majorization properties of log-concavely distributed random samples continue to hold for convolutions of α-symmetric distributions with α > 1. However, these properties are reversed in the case of convolutions of α-symmetric distributions with α < 1.

We show that the sample mean is the best linear unbiased estimator of the population mean for not extremely heavy-tailed populations in the sense of its peakedness. In such a case, the sample mean exhibits monotone consistency, and an increase in the sample size always improves its performance. However, efficiency of the sample mean in the sense of peakedness decreases with the sample size if it is used to estimate the location parameter under extreme heavy-tailedness. We also present applications of the results in the study of concentration inequalities for linear estimators.The results in this paper constitute a part of the author's dissertation “New Majorization Theory in Economics and Martingale Convergence Results in Econometrics” presented to the faculty of the Graduate School of Yale University in candidacy for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economics in March 2005. Some of the results were originally contained in the work circulated in 2003–2005 under the titles “Shifting Paradigms: On the Robustness of Economic Models to Heavy-Tailedness Assumptions” and “On the Robustness of Economic Models to Heavy-Tailedness Assumptions.” I am indebted to my advisers, Donald Andrews, Peter Phillips, and Herbert Scarf, for all their support and guidance in all stages of the current project. I also thank the associate editor, two anonymous referees, Donald Brown, Aydin Cecen, Gary Chamberlain, Brian Dineen, Darrell Duffie, Xavier Gabaix, Tilmann Gneiting, Philip Haile, Wolfgang Härdle, Boyan Jovanovic, Samuel Karlin, Benoît Mandelbrot, Alex Maynard, Marcelo Morreira, Ingram Olkin, Ben Polak, Gustavo Soares, Kevin Song, and the participants at seminars at the Departments of Economics at Yale University, University of British Columbia, the University of California at San Diego, Harvard University, the London School of Economics and Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Université de Montréal, McGill University, and New York University, the Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences at California Institute of Technology, Nuffield College, University of Oxford, and the Department of Statistics at Columbia University, and the participants at the 18th New England Statistics Symposium at Harvard University, April 2004, the International Conference on Stochastic Finance, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2004, and the Conference “Heavy Tails and Stable Paretian Distributions in Finance and Macroeconomics” in celebration of the 80th birthday of Benoît Mandelbrot, Deutsche Bundesbank, Eltville, Germany, November 2005, for many helpful comments and discussions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

An, M.Y. (1998) Logconcavity versus logconvexity: A complete characterization. Journal of Economic Theory 80, 350369.Google Scholar
Andrews, D.W.K. (2003) Cross-Section Regression with Common Shocks. Cowles Foundation Discussion paper 1428, Yale University.
Andrews, D.W.K. & P.C.B. Phillips (1987) Best median-unbiased estimation in linear regression with bounded asymmetric loss functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, 886893.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Z.W. (1948) On random variables with comparable peakedness. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 19, 7681.Google Scholar
Bretagnolle, J., D. Dacunha-Castelle, & J.L. Krivine (1966) Lois stables et espaces Lp. Annales de l'Institute H. Poincaré. Section B. Calcul des Probabilités et Statistique 2, 231259.Google Scholar
Cambanis, S., R. Keener, & G. Simons (1983) On α-symmetric distributions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 13, 213233.Google Scholar
Dharmadhikari, S.W. & K. Joag-Dev (1988) Unimodality, Convexity and Applications. Academic Press.
Eaton, M.L. (1970) A note on symmetric Bernoulli random variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 41, 12231226.Google Scholar
Efron, B. (1969) Student's t-test under symmetry conditions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64, 12781302.Google Scholar
Fang, K.-T., S. Kotz, & K.W. Ng (1990) Symmetric Multivariate and Related Distributions. Chapman and Hall.
Gneiting, T. (1998) On α-symmetric multivariate characteristic functions. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 64, 131147.Google Scholar
Hwang, J.T. (1985) Universal domination and stochastic domination: Estimation simultaneously under a broad class of loss functions. Annals of Statistics 13, 295314.Google Scholar
Ibragimov, R. (2004a) A Tale of Two Tails: Peakedness Properties in Inheritance Models of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion paper 2092. Available at http://post.economics.harvard.edu/hier/2005papers/HIER2092.pdf.
Ibragimov, R. (2004b) Demand-Driven Innovation and Spatial Competition over Time under Heavy-Tailed Signals. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion paper 2087. Available at http://post.economics.harvard.edu/hier/2005papers/HIER2087.pdf.
Ibragimov, R. (2004c) Optimal Bundling Strategies for Complements and Substitutes with Heavy-Tailed Valuations. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion paper 2088. Available at http://post.economics.harvard.edu/hier/2005papers/HIER2088.pdf.
Ibragimov, R. (2004d) Portfolio Diversification and Value at Risk under Thick-Tailedness. Harvard Institute of Economic Research Discussion paper 2086 and International Center for Finance at Yale School of Management working paper 01-50 (2005). Available at http://post.economics.harvard.edu/hier/2005papers/HIER2086.pdf.
Ibragimov, R. (2005) New majorization theory in economics and martingale convergence results in econometrics. Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.
Jensen, D.R. (1997) Peakedness of linear forms in ensembles and mixtures. Statistics and Probability Letters 35, 277282.Google Scholar
Karlin, S. (1968) Total Positivity. Stanford University Press.
Kuritsyn, Y.G. & A.V. Shestakov (1984) On α-symmetric distributions. Theory of Probability and Its Applications 29, 804806.Google Scholar
Ma, C. (1998) On peakedness of distributions of convex combinations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 70, 5156.Google Scholar
Marshall, A.W. & I. Olkin (1979) Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications. Academic Press.
Proschan, F. (1965) Peakedness of distributions of convex combinations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 36, 17031706.Google Scholar
Shaked, M. & J.G. Shanthikumar (1994) Stochastic Orders and Their Applications. Academic Press.
Tong, Y.L. (1994) Some recent developments on majorization inequalities in probability and statistics. Linear Algebra and Its Applications 199, 6990.Google Scholar
Uchaikin, V.V. & V.M. Zolotarev (1999) Chance and Stability. Stable Distributions and Their Applications. VSP.
Zastavnyi, V.P. (1993) Positive definite functions depending on the norm. Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics 1, 511522.Google Scholar
Zolotarev, V.M. (1986) One-Dimensional Stable Distributions. American Mathematical Society.