Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:05:38.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring participation in ecological monitoring in Nepal's community forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2015

SAM C. STADDON ,
ANDREA NIGHTINGALE  and
SHYAM K. SHRESTHA
SAM C. STADDON*
Affiliation:
Geography and the Lived Environment, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK
ANDREA NIGHTINGALE
Affiliation:
Geography and the Lived Environment, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
SHYAM K. SHRESTHA
Affiliation:
Geography and the Lived Environment, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh EH8 9XP, UK
*
*Correspondence: Dr Sam Staddon e-mail: sam.staddon@ed.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Members of the public and resource-dependent communities are increasingly participating alongside professional scientists to monitor the natural world. This study applies the contention from development studies that participatory approaches may be tyrannical to participatory monitoring of Nepal's community forests. There is a tyranny of the group because elites within the community stand to benefit at the cost of those already marginalized. In theory, tyranny is produced through the methods employed in the projects, as they promote scientific systems of monitoring at the expense of local understandings of environmental change; in practice, however, the latter aspects override official monitoring to enable effective learning from the projects. In some instances, tyranny is produced through decision-making and control, whilst, in other cases, the reverse is true and communities are empowered through their participatory monitoring efforts. Policy makers and those involved in participatory monitoring should endeavour to transform tyranny created at local and wider scales. Participatory monitoring holds huge potential in the assessment of biodiversity, natural resources and ecosystem services, but programmes and projects need to effectively deliver associated benefits of conservation and community empowerment.

Keywords

citizen sciencecommunity-based conservationdevelopment studiesecological monitoringinterdisciplinaryNepalparticipationparticipatory monitoring
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , September 2015 , pp. 268 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, J. & Guijt, I. (1998) Changing views on change: participatory approaches to monitoring the environment. SARL Discussion Paper No. 2, July 1998, IIED, London, UK.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Gibson, C.C. (1999) Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27: 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, H.L., Fernandez-Gimenez, M.E. & Sturtevant, V.E. (2008) Integration of local ecological knowledge and conventional science: a study of seven community-based forestry organizations in the USA. Ecology and Society 13 (2): 37 Google Scholar
Bell, S., Marzano, M., Cent, J., Kobierska, H., Podjed, D., Vandzinskaite, D., Reinert, H., Armaitiene, A., Grodzinska-Jurczak, M. & Muršic, R. (2008) What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 3443–3454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, F. & Folke, C. (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In: Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, ed. Berkes, F. F. & Folke, C., pp.1–26. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blaikie, P. (2006) Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34: 1942–1957.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. M. & Vainio-Mattila, A. (2003) Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology 31: 417–437.Google Scholar
Carter, J. (1995) Recent Approaches to Participatory Forest Resource Assessment. London, UK: ODI.Google Scholar
Carvalho, A. R., Williams, S., January, M. & Sowman, M. (2009) Reliability of community-based data monitoring in the Olifants River estuary (South Africa). Fisheries Research (Amsterdam) 96: 119–128.Google Scholar
Cleaver, F. (2001) Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development. In: Participation: the New Tyranny?, ed. Cooke, B. & Kothari, U., pp. 36–55. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cooke, B. & Kothari, U. (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny? London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Cornwall, A. (2002) Locating citizen participation. IDS Bulletin 33: 49–58.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F., Pirhofer-Walzl, K., Adrian, T.P., Kapijimpanga, D.R., Burgess, N.D., Jensen, P.M., Bonney, R., Funder, M., Landa, A., Levermann, N. & Madsen, J. (2013) Linking public participation in scientific research to the indicators and needs of international environmental agreements. Conservation Letters 7: 12–24.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F., Skutsch, M., Burgess, N.D., Jensen, P.M., Andrianandrasana, H., Karky, B., Lewis, R., Lovett, J.C., Massao, J., Ngaga, Y., Phartiyal, P., Poulsen, M.K., Singh, S.P., Solis, S., Sørensen, M., Tewari, A., Young, R. & Zahabu, E. (2011) At the heart of REDD+: a role for local people in monitoring forests? Conservation Letters 4: 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N.D., Funder, M., Blomley, T., Brashares, J., Akida, A., Jensen, A., Mendoza, M., Stuart-Hill, G., Poulsen, M.K., Ramadhani, H., Sam, M.K. & Topp-Jørgensen, E. (2010) Taking stock of nature in species-rich but economically poor areas: an emerging discipline of locally based monitoring. In: Taking Stock of Nature. Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice, ed. Lawrence, A., pp. 88–112. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N.D., Balmford, A., Donald, P,F., Funder, M., Jones, J.P.G., Alviola, P., Balete, D.S., Blomley, T., Brashares, J., Child, B., Enghoff, M., Fjeldså, J., Holt, S., Hübertz, H., Jensen, A.E., Jensen, P.M., Massao, J., Mendoza, M.M., Ngaga, Y., Poulsen, M.K., Rueda, R., Sam, M., Skielboe, T., Stuart-Hill, G., Topp-Jørgensen, E. & Yonten, D. (2009) Local participation in natural resource monitoring: a characterization of approaches. Conservation Biology 23: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danielsen, F., Burgess, N.D. & Balmford, A. (2005) Monitoring matters: examining the potential of locally-based approaches. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 2507–2542.Google Scholar
Diamond, N. (2002) Improving environmental governance through participatory biodiversity assessments: lessons from World Bank and USAID Work. In: Policy Implications of Participatory Biodiversity Assessment ETFRN International Seminar for Policy-Makers and Implementers, ed. Lawrence, A. E., p. 20. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. & Waterton, C. (2004) Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy. Science and Public Policy 31: 95–105.Google Scholar
Evans, K. & Guariguata, M.R. (2008) Participatory Monitoring in tropical forest management. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Funder, M., Danielsen, F., Ngaga, Y., Nielsen, M.R. & Poulsen, M.K. (2013) Reshaping conservation: the social dynamics of participatory monitoring in Tanzania's community-managed forests. Conservation and Society 11: 218–232.Google Scholar
Garcia, C. A. & Leschuyer, G. (2008) Monitoring, indicators and community based forest management in the tropics: pretexts or red herrings? Biodiversity & Conservation 17: 1303–1317.Google Scholar
Hernandez-Stefanoni, J. L., Bello Pineda, J. & Valdes Valadez, G. (2006) Comparing the use of indigenous knowledge with classification and ordination techniques for assessing the species composition and structure of vegetation in a tropical forest. Environmental Management 37: 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, S. & Mohan, G. (2004) Participation. From Tryanny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Holck, M. H. (2008) Participatory forest monitoring: an assessment of the accuracy of simple cost-effective methods. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 2023–2036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. P. G., Andriamarovololona, M.M., Hockley, N., Gibbons, J.M. & Milner-Gulland, E.J. (2008) Testing the use of interviews as a tool for monitoring trends in the harvesting of wild species. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 1205–1212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, A. (2009) The first cuckoo in winter: phenology, recording, credibility and meaning in Britain. Global Environmental Change 19: 173–179.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. (2010) Introduction: learning from experiences of participatory biodiversity assessment. In: Taking Stock of Nature: Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice, ed. Lawrence, A., pp. 1–29. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A. & Turnhout, E. (2010) Personal meaning in the public sphere: the standardisation and rationalisation of biodiversity data in the UK and the Netherlands. Journal of Rural Studies 26: 353–360.Google Scholar
Malla, Y. B., Neupane, H.R. & Branney, P.J. (2003) Why aren't poor people benefiting more from community forestry? Journal of Forest and Livelihood 3: 78–93.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M.R. & Lund, J.F. (2012) Seeing white elephants? The production and communication of information in a locally-based monitoring system in Tanzania. Conservation and Society 10 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. (2003) Nature-society and development: social, cultural and ecological change in Nepal. Geoforum 34: 525–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, A. J. (2002) Participating or just sitting in? The dynamics of gender and caste in community forestry. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 2 (1): 17–24.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. J. (2005) ‘The experts taught us all we know’ Professionalisation and knowledge in Nepalese community forestry. Antipode 37: 581–604.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. J. (2009) Methods: triangulation. In: International Encyclopaedia of Human Geography, Volume 11, ed. Kitchen, R. & Thrifts, N., pp. 489–492. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ojha, H. (2002) A critical assessment of scientific and political dimensions of the issue of community forests inventory in Nepal. A policy discussion note. ForestAction, Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Ojha, H. (2006) Techno-bureaucratic doxa and challenges for deliberative governance: the case of community forestry policy and practice in Nepal. Policy and Society 25: 151–204.Google Scholar
Ojha, H., Timsina, N.P., Chhetri, R.B. & Paudel, K.P. (2008) Knowledge Systems and Natural Resources. Management, Policy and Institutions in Nepal. New Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press India Pvt Ltd.Google Scholar
Paudel, K. P. & Ojha, H.R. (2008) Contested knowledge and reconciliation in Nepal's community forestry: a case of forest inventory policy. In: Knowledge Systems and Natural Resources. Management, Policy and Institutions in Nepal, ed. Ojha, H. R., Timsina, N.P., Chhetri, R.B. & Paudel, K.P.. New Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, L. (2005) Handling Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Songorwa, A. N. (1999) Community-based wildlife management (CWM) in Tanzania: are the communities interested? World Development 27: 2061–2079.Google Scholar
Staddon, S., Nightingale, A. & Shrestha, S. (2014) The social nature of participatory ecological monitoring. Society and Natural Resources 27: 899–914.Google Scholar
van Rijsoort, J., Jinfeng, Z., Ten Hoonte, M. & Lei, W. (2010) Participatory resources monitoring in SW China: lessons after five years. In: Taking Stock of Nature: Participatory Biodiversity Assessment for Policy, Planning and Practice, ed. Lawrence, A., pp. 142–164. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2003) Case Study Research. Design and Methods. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Staddon supplementary material

Staddon supplementary material 1

Download Staddon supplementary material(File)
File 16.1 KB