No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The discursive use of the concept of ‘corruption’ in parliamentary debates during the Portuguese Estado Novo (1935–74)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 June 2015
Abstract
Corruption is deviant behaviour from legal and social norms, observable in both dictatorships and democracies, and salient in different periods of the history of mankind. Studying corruption in dictatorships is particularly challenging due to the fact that freedom of expression is censored and there is little (if any) reliable information about the enforcement of legal provisions. This article provides a contribution to the growing literature on the role of legislatures in dictatorships by focusing on parliamentary debates on corruption as a discourse control mechanism. The case of the Portuguese legislature during the Estado Novo is paradigmatic in that regard. The National Assembly, as it will be demonstrated in this article, was able to shift the debate on corruption from the legal to the moral dimension and, thus, deprive citizens, and in particular the opposition, of objective standards to hold regime elites accountable for their misconduct.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , July 2015 , pp. 159 - 181
- Copyright
- © Societá Italiana di Scienza Politica 2015
References
Adão, Á. (ed.) (2012), A Educação nos artigos de jornal durante o Estado Novo (1945–1969). Um repertório cronológico, temático e onomástico, Lisbon: Instituto de Educação da Universidade de Lisboa.Google Scholar
Alatas, S.H. (1990), Corruption: Its Nature, Causes and Functions, Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
Alemão, S. (2008), ‘Ballets rose: as cloacas do regime’, in Em Simões do Paço, António (eds), Os anos de Salazar. O que se contava e o que se ocultava durante o Estado Novo, Numero 23. Lisboa: Planeta DeAgostini, pp. 7–27.Google Scholar
Boix, C. and Svolik, M. (2007), ‘Non-tyrannical autocracies’, unpublished manuscript. Retrieved 7 August 2013 from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/cpworkshop/papers/Boix.pdf.Google Scholar
Braga da Cruz, M. (1999), ‘Assembleia Nacional’, in A. Barreto and M.F. Mónica (eds), Dicionário de História de Portugal, Vol. VII Porto: Figueirinhas, pp. 132–134.Google Scholar
Brownlee, J.M. (2004), ‘Ruling parties and durable authoritarianism’, Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law Working Paper No. 23, Stanford Institute on International Studies.Google Scholar
Castilho, J.M.T. (2001), ‘A Assembleia Nacional, 1934–1974: esboço de caracterização’, Penélope 24: 65–84.Google Scholar
Castilho, J.M.T. (2007), A Assembleia Nacional (1934–1974). Doctoral thesis. Lisbon: ISCTE.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, R.A. (2002), A Assembleia Nacional do Pós-Guerra (1945–1949), Lisboa: Edições Afrontamento/Assembleia da República.Google Scholar
De Sousa, L. (2002), Corruption: assessing ethical standards in political life through control policies. Doctoral thesis. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
De Sousa, L. (2008), ‘“I Don’t Bribe, I Just Pull Strings”: assessing the fluidity of social representations of corruption in Portuguese society’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society 9(1): 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Sousa, L. and João, T. (eds) (2008), A Corrupção e os Portugueses. Atitudes, Práticas, Valores, Cascais: Rui Costa Pinto Edições.Google Scholar
Domínguez, J. (2002), ‘The perfect dictatorship? Comparing authoritarian rule in South Korea and in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico’. Paper prepared for delivery at the 2002 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 29–September 1, 2002, Boston, MA, Panel 11–25. Retrieved from http://scholar.harvard.edu/jorgedominguez/files/jid_perfect.pdfGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. (1993), ‘Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm’, Journal of Communication 43(4): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, T. (2005), Nem Ditadura, Nem Revolução. A Ala Liberal e o Marcelismo (1968–1974), Lisboa: Assembleia da República e Dom Quixote.Google Scholar
Ferreira, N. (2009), A câmara Corporativa no Estado Novo: composição, funcionamento e influência. Doctoral thesis. Lisbon: ICS. Retrieved from http://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/316Google Scholar
Folch, A.E. (2003), ‘Legislatures in authoritarian regimes’. Estudio/Working Paper No. 2003/196, Center for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences, Juan March Institute, Madrid, September.Google Scholar
Gandhi, J. (2008), Political Institutions Under Dictatorships, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandhi, J. and A., Przeworski (2006), ‘Cooperation, cooptation, and rebellion under dictatorships’, Economics & Politics 18(1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M. (1996), ‘The search for definitions: the vitality of politics and the issue of corruption’, International Social Science Journal 48(3): 321–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jos, P. (1993), ‘Empirical corruption research: beside the (moral) point?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory J-Part 3(3): 359–375.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2003), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. and L.A., Way (2003), ‘Autocracy by democratic rules: The dynamics of competitive autoritarianism in the post-cold war era’, Paper prepared for the conference, ‘Mapping the great zone: Clientelism and the boundary between democratic and democratizing’, Columbia University, April 4–5, 2003.Google Scholar
Linz, J.J. (1979), ‘Legislatures in organic-statist-authoritarian regimes: the case of Spain’, in J. Smith and L.D. Musolf (eds), Legislatures in Development: Dynamics of Change in New and Old States, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 91–95.Google Scholar
Lust-Okar, E. (2006), ‘Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jor- dan’, Democratization 13(3): 456–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, B. (2006), Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, A.C. (2011), ‘Ruling elites, political institutions and decision-making in fascist-era dictatorships: comparative perspectives’, in A.C. Pinto (ed.), Rethinking the Nature of Fascism: Comparative Perspectives, Basingstoke/NY: Palgrave/Macmillan, pp. 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, A.C. (2012), ‘Corporatism and authoritarian institutions in interwar European dictatorships’. Unpublished. Retrieved 7 May 2014 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2135576/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2135576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintas, J.M. (1996), ‘Assembleia Nacional’, in F. Rosas and J.M. Brandão de Brito (eds), Dicionário de História do Estado Novo, Vol. I Lisboa: Círculo de Leitores, pp. 69–70.Google Scholar
Reese, S. (2001), ‘Prolog. Framing public life: a bridging model for media research’, in S.D. Reese, O.H. Gandy and A.E. Grant (eds), Framing Public Life. Perspective on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. (1977), ‘Portée et signification des élections dans le Portugal autoritaire (1933–1974)’, Revue Française de Science Politique 27(1): 92–122. Retrieved from http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/article/rfsp_0035-2950_1977_num_27_1_393714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semetko, H. and Valkenburg, P. (2000), ‘Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news’, Journal of Communication 50(2): 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumbler, H. and Waisbord, S. (2004), ‘Political scandals and media across democracies: introduction’, American Behavioral Scientist 47(7–8): 1031–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar