Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:24:26.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical properties of iron matrix composites reinforced by copper-coated hybrid ceramic particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

Xinjian Cao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
Jianfeng Jin*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
Yuebo Zhang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
Bernie Yaping Zong
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials, Ministry of Education, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: jinjf@atm.neu.edu.cn
Get access

Abstract

We investigated improvements to the mechanical properties of iron matrix composites for the case where the surfaces of the reinforcing particles are coated with copper and a hybrid mixture of different types of reinforcing ceramic particles (hybrid particles mixture) is used. Copper coating on the surfaces of SiC, TiC, and TiN particles can eliminate interfacial defects to significantly improve the composites' mechanical properties. The addition of uncoated hybrid particles mixture has little effect on the tensile strength improvement of composites compared with composites reinforced by monolithic particles, whereas copper-coated hybrid reinforcement has a significant effect. Any composite reinforced with copper-coated hybrid particles mixture will always have higher strength than that reinforced with monolithic particles. Our findings suggest that the load transfer between the matrix and reinforcing particles improved because of different elastic moduli, coefficients of thermal expansion and reaction heats of different types of reinforcing particles.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Mei, Z., Yan, Y., and Cui, K.: Effect of matrix composition on the microstructure of in situ synthesized TiC particulate reinforced iron-based composites. Mater. Lett. 57(21), 3175 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhtara, F. and Guo, S.J.: Microstructure, mechanical and fretting wear properties of TiC-stainless steel composites. Mater. Charact. 59(1), 84 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, L., Xu, Y., Hojamberdiev, M., Wang, J., and Wang, J.: In situ fabrication of titanium carbide particulates-reinforced iron matrix composites. Mater. Des. 32(7), 3790 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesha, C.S. and Srinivas, C.K.: Friction and wear behavior of laser-sintered iron-silicon carbide composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(14), 5429 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagounis, E. and Lindroos, V.K.: Processing and properties of particulate reinforced steel matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 246(1–2), 221 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prabhu, T.R., Varma, V.K., and Vedantam, S.: Effect of reinforcement type, size, and volume fraction on the tribological behavior of Fe matrix composites at high sliding speed conditions. Wear 309, 247 (2014).Google Scholar
Prabhu, T.R., Varma, V.K., and Vedantam, S.: Effect of SiC volume fraction and size on dry sliding wear of Fe/SiC/graphite hybrid composites for high sliding speed applications. Wear 309, 1 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cen, Q., Jiang, Y., Zhou, R., Xu, Y., and Wang, J.: Study on in situ synthesis of TiC particle reinforced iron matrix composite. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 20(8), 1447 (2011).Google Scholar
Ibrahim, I.A., Mohamed, F.A., and Lavernia, E.J.: Particulate reinforced metal matrix composites—A review. J. Mater. Sci. 26, 1137 (1991).Google Scholar
Weber, S. and Theisen, W.: Sintering of high wear resistant metal matrix composites. Adv. Eng. Mater. 9(3), 165 (2007).Google Scholar
Li, J., Zong, B.Y., Wang, Y., and Zhuang, W.: Experiment and modeling of mechanical properties on iron matrix composites reinforced by different types of ceramic particles. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 527(29–30), 7545 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhuang, W., Zong, B.Y., Wang, Y., and Yang, Y.: Processing and properties of SiCp/Fe composites by resistance sintering with a novel dynamic temperature control. J. Compos. Mater. 47(8), 1001 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, B., Dong, S., Coddeta, P., Zhou, G., Sheng, O., Liao, H., and Coddeta, C.: Microstructure and tensile behavior of hybrid nano-micro SiC reinforced iron matrix composites produced by selective laser melting. J. Alloys Compd. 579, 415 (2013).Google Scholar
Chakthin, S., Poolthong, N., and Tongsri, R.: Effect of reaction between Fe and carbide particles on mechanical properties of Fe-base composite. Adv. Mater. Res. 5557, 357 (2008).Google Scholar
Aigbodion, V.S. and Hassan, S.B.: Effects of silicon carbide reinforcement on microstructure and properties of cast Al–Si–Fe/SiC particulate composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 447(1–2), 355 (2007).Google Scholar
Pagounis, E., Talvitieb, M., and Lindroosa, V.K.: Influence of the metal/ceramic interface on the microstructure and mechanical properties of HIPed iron-based composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 56(11), 1329 (1996).Google Scholar
Pelleg, J.: Reactions in the matrix and interface of the Fe–SiC metal matrix composite system. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 269(1–2), 225 (1999).Google Scholar
Tang, W., Zheng, Z., Ding, H., and Jin, Z.: Control of the interface reaction between silicon carbide and iron. Mater. Chem. Phys. 80(1), 360 (2003).Google Scholar
Chawla, N. and Chawla, K.K.: Metal Matrix Composites (Springer-Verlag Inc., New York, 2005); pp. 113, 187.Google Scholar
Kretz, F., Gacsi, Z., Kovacs, J., and Pieczonka, T.: The electroless deposition of nickel on SiC particles for aluminum matrix composites. Surf. Coat. Technol. 180181, 575 (2004).Google Scholar
Yi, D., Yu, P., Hu, B., Liu, H., Wang, B., and Jiang, Y.: Preparation of nickel-coated titanium carbide particulates and their use in the production of reinforced iron matrix composites. Mater. Des. 52, 572 (2013).Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Zong, B.Y., Jin, J., and Cao, X.: Electroless copper plating on particulate reinforcements and the effects on mechanical properties of SiCp/Fe composite. Surf. Eng. 31, 232 (2015).Google Scholar
Hao, S. and Xie, J.: Tensile properties and strengthening mechanisms of SiCp-reinforced aluminum matrix composites as a function of relative particle size ratio. J. Mater. Res. 28(15), 2047 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razavi, M., Yaghmaee, M.S., Rahimipour, M.R., and Tousi, S.S.R.: The effect of production method on properties of Fe–TiC composite. Int. J. Miner. Process. 94(3–4), 97 (2010).Google Scholar
Zhou, D., Qiu, F., and Jiang, Q.: Simultaneously increasing the strength and ductility of nano-sized TiN particle reinforced Al–Cu matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 596, 98 (2014).Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Song, M., Sun, C., and He, Y.: Effects of particle size and distribution on the mechanical properties of SiC reinforced Al–Cu alloy composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528(3), 1131 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, K., Pedersen, A.S., Pryds, N., Thorsen, K.A., and List, J.L.: The effect of particles in different sizes on the mechanical properties of spray formed steel composites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 326(1), 40 (2002).Google Scholar
Rahimian, M., Ehsani, N., Parvin, N., and Baharvandi, H.: The effect of particle size, sintering temperature and sintering time on the properties of Al–Al2O3 composites made by powder metallurgy. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(14), 5387 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, K. and Bandyopadhyay, T.K.: Synthesis and characterization of zirconium carbide-reinforced iron-based composite. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 379(1–2), 83 (2004).Google Scholar
Ahmadi, A., Toroghinejad, M.R., and Najafizadeh, A.: Evaluation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al/Al2O3/SiC hybrid composite fabricated by accumulative roll bonding process. Mater. Des. 53, 13 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Yang, C., Guan, L., and Yan, B.: TiB2/Al2O3 ceramic particle reinforced aluminum fabricated by spray deposition. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 496(1–2), 52 (2008).Google Scholar
Zhao, D., Liu, X., Pan, Y., Bian, X., and Liu, X.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of in situ synthesized (TiB2+Al2O3)/Al–Cu composites. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 189(1–3), 237 (2007).Google Scholar
Zhuang, W., Zong, B.Y., Zhang, Y., and Cao, X.: Effects of mechanical impact metal coating on properties and microstructure of SiCp/Fe composites. J. Northeast Univ. 34(5), 663 (2013).Google Scholar
Ye, D. and Hu, J.: Practical Inorganic Thermodynamic Data Handbook, 2nd ed. (Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, 2002).Google Scholar
Zong, B.Y., Zhang, F., Wang, G., and Zuo, L.: Strengthening mechanism of load sharing of particulate reinforcements in a metal matrix composite. J. Mater. Sci. 42(12), 4215 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajabi, A., Ghazali, M.J., and Daud, A.R.: Chemical composition, microstructure and sintering temperature modifications on mechanical properties of TiC-based cermet—A review. Mater. Des. 67, 95 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J., Lee, M., Lu, H., and Lii, D.: Microstructure, fracture behavior and mechanical properties of TiN/Si3N4 composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 45(3), 203 (1996).Google Scholar