Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Flynn, D.J.
Nyhan, Brendan
and
Reifler, Jason
2017.
The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics.
Political Psychology,
Vol. 38,
Issue. S1,
p.
127.
Hynes, Mike
2018.
Shining a brighter light into the digital ‘black box’: A call for stronger sociological (re)engagement with digital technology design, development and adoption debates.
Irish Journal of Sociology,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 1,
p.
94.
Baum, Seth
2018.
Countering Superintelligence Misinformation.
Information,
Vol. 9,
Issue. 10,
p.
244.
Kane, Aimee A.
Kiesler, Sara
and
Kang, Ruogu
2018.
Inaccuracy Blindness in Collaboration Persists, even with an Evaluation Prompt.
p.
1.
Van Bavel, Jay J.
and
Pereira, Andrea
2018.
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 3,
p.
213.
Fernandez, Miriam
and
Alani, Harith
2018.
Online Misinformation.
p.
595.
Tucker, Joshua
Guess, Andrew
Barbera, Pablo
Vaccari, Cristian
Siegel, Alexandra
Sanovich, Sergey
Stukal, Denis
and
Nyhan, Brendan
2018.
Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Meinert, Judith
Mirbabaie, Milad
Dungs, Sebastian
and
Aker, Ahmet
2018.
Social Computing and Social Media. User Experience and Behavior.
Vol. 10913,
Issue. ,
p.
484.
Hjorth, Frederik
and
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca
2019.
Ideological Asymmetry in the Reach of Pro-Russian Digital Disinformation to United States Audiences.
Journal of Communication,
Vol. 69,
Issue. 2,
p.
168.
Rachavelias, Michail G.
2019.
Online financial crimes and fraud committed with electronic means of payment—a general approach and case studies in Greece.
ERA Forum,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 3,
p.
339.
Korsunska, Ania
2019.
Information in Contemporary Society.
Vol. 11420,
Issue. ,
p.
162.
Carpenter, Christopher J.
2019.
Cognitive dissonance, ego-involvement, and motivated reasoning.
Annals of the International Communication Association,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Ji, Jiaojiao
Chao, Naipeng
and
Ding, Jieyu
2019.
Rumormongering of genetically modified (GM) food on Chinese social network.
Telematics and Informatics,
Vol. 37,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Wittenberg, Chloe
and
Berinsky, Adam J.
2020.
Social Media and Democracy.
p.
163.
Van Bavel, Jay
Baicker, Katherine
Boggio, Paulo
Capraro, Valerio
Cichocka, Aleksandra
Cikara, Mina
Crockett, Molly
Crum, Alia
Douglas, Karen
Druckman, James N.
Drury, John
Dube, Oeindrila
Ellemers, Naomi
Finkel, Eli
Fowler, James H.
Gelfand, Michele Joy
Han, Shihui
Haslam, S. Alexander
Jetten, Jolanda
Kitayama, Shinobu
Mobbs, Dean
Napper, Lucy
Packer, Dominic
Pennycook, Gordon
Peters, Ellen
Petty, Richard
Rand, David G.
Reicher, Steve
Schnall, Simone
Shariff, Azim
Skitka, Linda J.
Smith, Sandra Susan
Sunstein, Cass R.
Tabri, Nassim
Tucker, Joshua Aaron
van der Linden, Sander
van Lange, Paul A. M.
Weeden, Kim
Wohl, Michael
Zaki, Jamil
Zion, Sean
and
Willer, Robb
2020.
Using Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic Response.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Rodríguez Rodríguez, Jorge Miguel
and
López Pan, Fernando
2020.
El Fact Checking en España. Plataformas, prácticas y rasgos distintivos.
Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
1045.
Walter, Nathan
and
Tukachinsky, Riva
2020.
A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Continued Influence of Misinformation in the Face of Correction: How Powerful Is It, Why Does It Happen, and How to Stop It?.
Communication Research,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 2,
p.
155.
Koch, Thomas
and
Denner, Nora
2020.
Traditionen und Transformationen des Öffentlichen.
p.
73.
Carey, John M.
Chi, Victoria
Flynn, D. J.
Nyhan, Brendan
and
Zeitzoff, Thomas
2020.
The effects of corrective information about disease epidemics and outbreaks: Evidence from Zika and yellow fever in Brazil.
Science Advances,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 5,
Ecker, Ullrich K. H.
O'Reilly, Ziggy
Reid, Jesse S.
and
Chang, Ee Pin
2020.
The effectiveness of short‐format refutational fact‐checks.
British Journal of Psychology,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 1,
p.
36.