Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T20:09:03.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The relationship between biogenetic attributions and desire for social distance from persons with schizophrenia and major depression revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2014

M. C. Angermeyer ,
A. Daubmann ,
K. Wegscheider ,
E. Mnich ,
G. Schomerus  and
O. v. d. Knesebeck
M. C. Angermeyer*
Affiliation:
Center for Public Mental Health, Gösing am Wagram, Austria
A. Daubmann
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
K. Wegscheider
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
E. Mnich
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
G. Schomerus
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany HELIOS Hanseklinikum Stralsund, Stralsund, Germany
O. v. d. Knesebeck
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr M. C. Angermeyer, Center for Public Mental Health, Untere Zeile 13, A-3482 Gösing am Wagram, Austria. (Email: angermeyer@aon.at)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aims.

Previous population-based studies did not support the view that biological and genetic causal models help increase social acceptance of people with mental illness. However, practically all these studies used un-labelled vignettes depicting symptoms of the disorders of interest. Thus, in these studies the public's reactions to pathological behaviour had been assessed rather than reactions to psychiatric disorders that had explicitly been labelled as such. The question arises as to whether results would have been similar if respondents had been confronted with vignettes with explicit mention of the respective diagnosis.

Methods.

Analyses are based on data of a telephone survey in two German metropolises conducted in 2011. Case-vignettes with typical symptoms suggestive of depression or schizophrenia were presented to the respondents. After presentation of the vignette respondents were informed about the diagnosis.

Results.

We found a statistically significant association of the endorsement of brain disease as a cause with greater desire for social distance from persons with schizophrenia. In major depression, this relation was absent. With both disorders, there was no statistically significant association between the endorsement of hereditary factors as a cause and social distance.

Conclusions.

Irrespective of whether unlabelled or labelled vignettes are employed, the ascription to biological or genetic causes seems not to be associated with a reduction of the public's desire for social distance from people with schizophrenia or depression. Our results corroborate the notion that promulgating biological and genetic causal models may not help decrease the stigma surrounding these illnesses.

Keywords

Causal attributionsmajor depressionschizophreniasocial distance
Type
Original Articles
Information
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , August 2015 , pp. 335 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angermeyer, MC, Dietrich, S (2006). Public beliefs about and attitudes towards people with mental illness: a review of population studies. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 113, 163–179.Google Scholar
Angermeyer, MC, Matschinger, H (1996). The effect of diagnostic labelling on the lay theory regarding schizophrenic disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 31, 316–320.Google Scholar
Angermeyer, MC, Matschinger, H (2003). The stigma of mental illness: effects of labeling on public attitudes towards people with mental disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 108, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angermeyer, MC, Holzinger, A, Carta, MG, Schomerus, G (2011). Biogenetic explanations and public acceptance of mental illness. A systematic review of population studies. British Journal of Psychiatry 199, 367–372.Google Scholar
Angermeyer, MC, Mnich, E, Daubmann, A, Wegscheider, K, Kofahl, C, Knesebeck, Ovd (2013). Biogenetic explanations and public acceptance of people with eating disorders: results from population surveys in two large German cities. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 48, 1667–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bag, B, Yilmaz, S, Kirpinar, I (2006). Factors influencing social distance from people with schizophrenia. International Journal of Clinical Practice 60, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, MW, Cudeck, R (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models (ed. Bollen, KA and Long, JS), pp. 136–162. Sage Publications: New Park.Google Scholar
Clement, S, Jarrett, M, Henderson, C, Thornicroft, G (2010). Messages to use in population-level campaigns to reduce mental health-related stigma: consensus development study. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 19, 72–79.Google Scholar
Common Statistics Portal (2012). Retrieved 25 March 2014 from http://www.statistikportal.de.Google Scholar
Corrigan, PW, Watson, AC (2002). Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry 1, 6–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, S, Beck, M, Bujantugs, B, Kenzine, D, Matschinger, H, Angermeyer, MC (2004). The relationship between public causal beliefs and social distance toward mentally ill people. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 38, 348–354.Google Scholar
Dietrich, S, Matschinger, H, Angermeyer, MC (2006). The relationship between biogenetic causal explanations and social distance toward people with mental disorders: results from a population survey in Germany. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 52, 166–174.Google Scholar
Federal Statistical Office (2012). Retrieved 25 March 2014 from https://www.destatis.de.Google Scholar
Grausgruber, A, Meise, U, Katschnig, H, Schöny, W, Fleischhacker, WW (2007). Patterns of social distance towards people suffering from schizophrenia in Austria: a comparison between the general public, relatives and mental health staff. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 115, 310–319.Google Scholar
Griffiths, KM, Christensen, H (2004). Commentary on ‘The relationship between public causal beliefs and social distance toward mentally ill people’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 38, 355–357.Google Scholar
Hengartner, MP, Loch, AA, Lawson, FL, Guarniero, FB, Wang, Y-P, Rössler, W, Gattau, WF (2013). Public stigmatization of different mental disorders: a comprehensive attitude survey. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 22, 269–274.Google Scholar
Holborn, AT, Reavley, NJ, Jorm, AF (2012). Differences between landline and mobile-only respondents in a dual-frame mental health literacy survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 36, 192–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorm, AF, Griffiths, KM (2008). The public's stigmatizing attitudes towards people with mental disorders: how important are biomedical conceptualizations? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 118, 315–321.Google Scholar
Kermode, M, Bowen, K, Arole, S, Pathare, S, Jorm, AF (2009). Attitudes to people with mental disorders: a mental health literacy survey in a rural area of Maharashtra, India. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 44, 1087–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knesebeck, Ovd, Mnich, E, Kofahl, C, Makowski, AC, Lambert, M, Karow, A, Bock, T, Härter, M, Angermeyer, MC (2013). Estimated prevalence of mental disorders and the desire for social distance: results from population surveys in two large German cities. Psychiatry Research 209, 670–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasalvia, A, Tansella, M (2013). What is in a name? Renaming schizophrenia as a starting point for moving ahead with its re-conceptualization. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 22, 285–287.Google Scholar
Link, BG, Cullen, FT, Frank, J, Wozniak, JF (1987). The social rejection of former mental patients: understanding why labels matter. American Journal of Sociology 92, 1461–1500.Google Scholar
Muthén, LK, Muthén, BO (1998–2011). Mplus User's Guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Phelan, JC (2005). Geneticization of deviant behavior and consequences for stigma: the case of mental illness. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour 46, 307–322.Google Scholar
Rüsch, N, Evans-Lacko, S, Thornicroft, G (2012). What is a mental illness? Public views and their effects on attitudes and disclosure. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 46, 641–650.Google Scholar
Schnittker, J (2008). An uncertain revolution: why the rise of a genetic model of mental illness has not increased tolerance. Social Science and Medicine 67, 1370–1381.Google Scholar
Schomerus, G, Matschinger, H, Angermeyer, MC (2013). Continuum beliefs and stigmatizing attitudes towards persons with schizophrenia, depression and alcohol dependence. Psychiatry Research 209, 665–669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schomerus, G, Matschinger, H, Angermeyer, MC (2014). Causal beliefs of the public and social acceptance of persons with mental illness: a comparative analysis of schizophrenia, depression and alcohol dependence. Psychological Medicine 44, 303–314.Google Scholar