Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:46:36.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indirect Expropriation in International Law by Sebastian López ESCARCENA. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2014. xxxix + 254 pp. Hardcover: £72.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2015

Aniruddha RAJPUT
Aniruddha RAJPUT*
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
Asian Journal of International Law , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , July 2015 , pp. 412 - 413
Copyright
© Asian Journal of International Law 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

5. The most influential writing, which sparked this debate, was by Professor Christie. See CHRISTIE, G.C., “What Constitutes a Taking of Property Under International Law” (1962) 38 BYIL 307Google Scholar.

6. Saluka Investments B.V. v. The Czech Republic, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 17 March 2006, para. 263.

7. Art. 5, US Model BIT, 2012; art. 15.5 USA-Singapore Free Trade Agreement.

8. Pope & Talbot Inc. v The Government of Canada, Interim Award, NAFTA, 26 June 2000, para. 104.

9. ALDRICH, George H., The Jurisprudence of the Iran-United States Claims Tribunal (New York: Clarendon Press Oxford, 1996), p. 178CrossRefGoogle Scholar.