Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T02:00:15.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trade-offs between the accuracy and integrity of autobiographical narrative in memory reconsolidation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Carlos Montemayor
Carlos Montemayor*
Affiliation:
San Francisco State University, Department of Philosophy, San Francisco, CA 94132. cmontema@sfsu.eduhttps://sites.google.com/site/carlosmontemayorphilosophysfsu/home
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lane et al. propose an integrative model for the reconsolidation of traces in their timely and impressive article. This commentary draws attention to trade-offs between accuracy and self-narrative integrity in the model. The trade-offs concern the sense of agency in memory and its role in both implicit and explicit memory reconsolidation, rather than balances concerning degrees of emotional arousal.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e17
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (2013) Evolutionary psychology: New perspectives on cognition and motivation. Annual Review of Psychology 64:201–29.Google Scholar
Gallistel, R. & King, A. (2009) Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. Blackwell/Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1991) Reality monitoring: Evidence from confabulation in organic brain disease patients. In: Awareness of deficit after brain injury: Clinical and theoretical issues, ed. Prigatano, G. & Schacter, D. L., pp. 176–97. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LeDoux, J. (1996) The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Loftus, E. (2005) Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning and Memory 12:361–66.Google Scholar
Montemayor, C. (2013) Minding time: A philosophical and theoretical approach to the psychology of time. Brill.Google Scholar
Nadel, L., Samsonovich, A., Ryan, L. & Moscovitch, M. (2000) Multiple trace theory of human memory: Computational, neuroimaging, and neuropsychological results. Hippocampus 10(4):352–68.Google Scholar
Quiroga, R. Q. (2012) Borges and memory: Encounters with the human brain, trans. Fernandez, J. P.. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rice, H. J. & Rubin, D. C. (2009) I can see it both ways: First- and third-person visual perspectives at retrieval. Consciousness and Cognition 18:877–90.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. (1986) Transactive Memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In: Theories of group behavior, ed. Mullen, B. & Goethals, G. R., pp. 105–208. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar